Quote:
Originally Posted by The Budaj Bugatti
Oh, shut up. Stewart is not yet proven, but he's had more time to demonstrate his skills than Bernier. Maybe he would've gone onto score 20 goals, maybe not, but he probably would have scored some more points over the stretch of 82 games given his comfort level on the ice. Maybe if Bernier had played at least a dozen games or so you could defend posting this melodramatic paragraph. Bernier is very young and talented, and I'm not sure if Stewart for him is fair or not, but it's hard to defend the stance that Stewart is not more proven given that he has had more time in the NHL (compared to Bernier's four games) and has been noticed very positively even off the scoreboard.
|
Clearly, you misunderstood the entire point of my quote "melodramatic paragraph" (talk about reading into things too much). I'm not arguing that Stewart has more NHL experience. That's retardedly obvious. I simply made a general statement about the overuse and misuse of terminology that has to do with the potential of players. I sensed bias and called shenanigans. You may not see it the same way and that's fine. Just don't ***** about it please.
