Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > NHL Draft - Prospects
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2

NHL Draft - Prospects Discuss hockey prospects from all over the world and the NHL Draft.

USA Today's top ten draft winners

Thread Tools
06-29-2009, 03:35 PM
slovakfan*'s Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Kosice
Country: Slovakia
Posts: 1,677
vCash: 500
Tomas Tarter, who reminds them of Marty Straka

- Theater?
o NO... Treater ! ! !
- ah... it's Tarter
o OK, who cares...

slovakfan* is offline   Reply With Quote
06-29-2009, 03:49 PM
madman's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Steamboat Springs
Country: United States
Posts: 2,456
vCash: 500
Ooof, I wish I hadn't opened that link...

madman is offline   Reply With Quote
06-29-2009, 04:29 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 15,477
vCash: 500
The annual futile exercise of assigning "winners" and "losers" a day after the draft.

A few months ago, I stumbled on an article declaring winners/losers from the 2004 Draft. Like most of us, the writer thought the Kings got a steal with Lauri Tukonen.

On the flipside, the author noted that the Red Wings had a poor draft since they didn't have a first or second rounder. Although they did walk out of that draft with Johan Franzen. The author also panned the Bruins selecting two small forwards, namely David Krejci and Kris Versteeg.

Brodeur is online now   Reply With Quote
06-29-2009, 04:30 PM
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: LA BABY!!
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,391
vCash: 500
this isn't even draft related.

ugotmybeef* is offline   Reply With Quote
06-29-2009, 04:33 PM
6th Overall Blows
LickTheEnvelope's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 29,365
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by The Leafinator View Post
Acquiring J-Bo's rights gets you second place as winners of the draft?

What happens if the Flames can't sign him? lol
4th rated?

This list is terrible.

Anahiem had a decent draft... but #1? No Ottawa or Edmonton?

LickTheEnvelope is offline   Reply With Quote
06-29-2009, 04:33 PM
FLYLine27's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NY
Country: United States
Posts: 39,147
vCash: 500
Would have been nice if the article focused on who drafted the best...not talking about the trades for JayBos rights, or how many 1st round picks the Ducks got.

FLYLine27 is offline   Reply With Quote
06-29-2009, 04:58 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,528
vCash: 500
All these draft grades by journalists and fans is a joke.

Every NHL teams spends millions of dollars on scouting, yet fans and journalists think some how have superior knowledge to grade what the scouts/GM did.

It's a crapshoot. It's not the NFL, where kids are older, and have all come from the same league. It's hockey, and they come from numerous leagues all over the world, playing against a variety competition, and the are 17/18 years old. It's a crapshoot, and teams pay millions of dollars to get the "best opinions", which still have small odds. Yet every year, fans and journalists feel they have the "knowledge" to evaluate them, like a teacher grading a spelling test.

dulzhok is offline   Reply With Quote
06-29-2009, 07:34 PM
Everyone! PANIC!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 20,048
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by CircularTheory View Post
I think the Wild did pretty well.

We got Leddy in the first round, giving us a bluechip D prospect.
We got Hackett in the 3rd, giving us a bluechip G prospect.
We got Haula in the 7th, projected earlier this season (or was it before) to be an early 2nd rounder.
You throw blue chip out there too much. Leddy and Hackett aren't blue chippers. They are quality prospects but not blue chipper.

thestonedkoala is offline   Reply With Quote
06-29-2009, 10:07 PM
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,158
vCash: 500
Brutal article.

Based on their simplistic pick and chose logic, you could put just about any of NHL teams out there in the top 10.

TheBudsForever is offline   Reply With Quote
06-30-2009, 07:20 AM
Heffalump Country
GoRatsGo's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: 100 Aker Wood
Country: United States
Posts: 1,550
vCash: 50
That list is horrible...

GoRatsGo is offline   Reply With Quote
06-30-2009, 02:41 PM
Haute Couturier
Registered User
Haute Couturier's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 6,046
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by flamesfever View Post
Crazy that they list three of the top ten winners as trades. Not sure Philly should be on that list, with their four first rounders (players and picks). Mind you a cup final appearance and it won't look so bad.

Agreed that the Flames move was bold, not sure if they should be considered winners until they can sign j-bo.
The Flyers got the best player at the draft. I would say they should be ranked higher if they are going to rank transactions in along with it. They did overpay IMO, but they gave up Lupul, Sbisa, and a bunch of maybes for a Hall of Famer.

That being said, I would have preferred to read a list judging the actual drafting by each team and not transactions.

Haute Couturier is offline   Reply With Quote

Forum Jump


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2016 All Rights Reserved.