HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > San Jose Sharks
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Is Doug Wilson too attached?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
08-16-2009, 09:36 AM
  #1
Le Rosbeef
Registered User
 
Le Rosbeef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,491
vCash: 500
Is Doug Wilson too attached?

http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Eklun...ve-Now/1/22542

Forgive me, I've been listening to Hockeybuzz (as I was bored!) and Ryan Garner was on the show talking Sharks (if you're interested, it's at #29:08 to 38:10 if you don't want to listen to the non-Sharks stuff!)

Normally I'm not Garner's biggest fan as I'm sure you'll know, but he did explain in depth about his views on Marleau and the Sharks so I listened in.

He raised a point that kind of struck a chord worth discussing:

There's been speculation by some media types that our GM might overvalue his players in trades. Garner suggested it might be because Doug Wilson is getting too attached to his players - it's an interesting question. The key question was, Does he believe his own propaganda? (hence his overvaluing of his own assets in trades). Is he just too loyal? Too nice a guy?

Garner backed it by stating that most often the guys he (Wilson) had traded were guys who'd been Sharks for less than 3 years.

What do people think? I'm not sure one way or another but it made me ponder it from another angle this summer! From a speculative point of view Wilson did seem very angry after the playoffs but without action to back it up, is it just hollow words designed to placate the fanbase without taking action against those he's too attached to?

I'm intrigued!

...As an aside, Eklund said during the same show that he's been hearing this week that Marleau would waive his NTC. Take that for what it's worth!

((Oh and just in case you missed it, the same Garner that wanted rid of Marleau in his last blog stated on the show that he thinks that "we haven't seen the best of him yet" and "it'd be a shame to see him go". Interesting slant!))

Le Rosbeef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 09:41 AM
  #2
Ender
Registered User
 
Ender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: keep it secret...
Country: Ireland
Posts: 5,161
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Ender Send a message via Yahoo to Ender
if hockeybuzz has poor rumors on trades and signings then why wouldn't they have poor speculation of GM's opinions?

Ender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 09:42 AM
  #3
Le Rosbeef
Registered User
 
Le Rosbeef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,491
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ender View Post
if hockeybuzz has poor rumors on trades and signings then why wouldn't they have poor speculation of GM's opinions?
Very fair. I should say I'm not buying wholesale into this as a ratified fact.

I just thought it was an interesting viewpoint from someone (Garner) who seems to get some love on these boards!

Le Rosbeef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 09:54 AM
  #4
Lee Van Cleef*
 
Lee Van Cleef*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Perth, Australia
Country: Australia
Posts: 8,798
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SharkyMcWoo View Post
Very fair. I should say I'm not buying wholesale into this as a ratified fact.

I just thought it was an interesting viewpoint from someone (Garner) who seems to get some love on these boards!
I hope that was sarcasm.

Lee Van Cleef* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 10:03 AM
  #5
Le Rosbeef
Registered User
 
Le Rosbeef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,491
vCash: 500
No sarcasm. I'm certainly not the biggest fan of some of the stuff he writes but I've seen several quite defensively toned posts in his favour too.

It's the offseason, eh?

Le Rosbeef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 10:12 AM
  #6
Lee Van Cleef*
 
Lee Van Cleef*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Perth, Australia
Country: Australia
Posts: 8,798
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SharkyMcWoo View Post
No sarcasm. I'm certainly not the biggest fan of some of the stuff he writes but I've seen several quite defensively toned posts in his favour too.

It's the offseason, eh?
I wish that was sarcasm.

Lee Van Cleef* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 11:23 AM
  #7
VP and GM
Havlat is gone!
 
VP and GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: at home
Country: United States
Posts: 5,368
vCash: 500
Make no mistake as to how hard it is to move vetern players with high salarys in a cap market. We all know DW won't do just any deal as he has certian player(s) he'd want, selling teams may not be ready to move them so patence is required for both sides timeing to match up. As a GM you allways want to get the most in return for players - does this mean DW is over valuing assets and or has become attached to them? History shows he did manage McLaren off the team last season and has made deals for players he wanted in Joe and Boyle. I don't think we paid to much for either at this point in time so i'd have to say he's not over valuing or attached to the players that where moved out.

Don't forget that assets are scouted by other teams and the most of know what's going on with players performance on and off the ice. DW would clearly be selling low with Cheech. Or he could keep him and get his numbers up, proving he's in his prime, and move him for something more in return. I really think cheech would benefit by playing with other players that can set him up more - problem is we have no cap to get that player so we'll probally lose him before the season starts. Given his numbers we'll never get what we could have got for him the year he had all the points, he's probally looked at as a reclaimation project at this point by other GMs.

VP and GM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 11:27 AM
  #8
hockeyball
Registered User
 
hockeyball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 17,599
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SharkyMcWoo View Post
No sarcasm. I'm certainly not the biggest fan of some of the stuff he writes but I've seen several quite defensively toned posts in his favour too.

It's the offseason, eh?
Thats usually me.

I'm not a particular fan of Garner's, I just like having anybody writing about the Sharks, good or bad. I don't like how people get on his case for his opinions. If everyone who wrote for the Shark's only talked about the positives it wouldn't be very interesting.

hockeyball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 11:38 AM
  #9
Pinkfloyd
Registered User
 
Pinkfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Roseville
Country: United States
Posts: 32,034
vCash: 2283
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyball View Post
Thats usually me.

I'm not a particular fan of Garner's, I just like having anybody writing about the Sharks, good or bad. I don't like how people get on his case for his opinions. If everyone who wrote for the Shark's only talked about the positives it wouldn't be very interesting.
I've always been against this line of thinking. Good or bad isn't the problem when it comes to Garner. It's being properly informed and articulating said opinion with justification. Only in his own world has he ever done that but anyone critically thinking through any of his articles should realize that doesn't happen.

I would rather have nothing said about the Sharks at all if someone can't give an educated opinion about them. That is why I refuse to read anymore of Garner's blogs and believe everyone would be better off if he just stopped writing them.

Pinkfloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 02:14 PM
  #10
Sleepy
Registered User
 
Sleepy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,805
vCash: 500
Garner's right, we should trade JT for a 2nd line winger, a 2nd line Dman, and a 4th line center.

Sleepy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 03:21 PM
  #11
Kitten Mittons
Registered User
 
Kitten Mittons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco
Country: Armenia
Posts: 47,527
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SharkyMcWoo View Post
I'm
...As an aside, Eklund said during the same show that he's been hearing this week that Marleau would waive his NTC. Take that for what it's worth!
From Ek's twitter:
Quote:
Just was told that an eastern conference team is trying to convince marleau to come east and will consider flying to meet with him Monday.
Talk to the wife, imbeciles; talk to the wife!!!!

Kitten Mittons is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 03:28 PM
  #12
TheGooooch
HFBoards Sponsor
 
TheGooooch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Francisco
Country: United States
Posts: 17,861
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidhye View Post
Talk to the wife, imbeciles; talk to the wife!!!!


That team obviously doesn't know how that household is "supposedly" ran (I don't know but commenting on heresay)

TheGooooch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 03:47 PM
  #13
Le Rosbeef
Registered User
 
Le Rosbeef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,491
vCash: 500
Says it's New Jersey.

Didn't we look at a deal like this a while ago and realise there's not a lot they could offer us which was of use that they'd likely be willing to give up?

Le Rosbeef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 04:00 PM
  #14
SJeasy
Registered User
 
SJeasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Jose
Country: United States
Posts: 12,323
vCash: 500
Take a look around on GMs who change players with regularity. Their performance is not stellar although they are hailed for their "big" moves. It is for the fans. The steady (hold on to your players) GMs have a big advantage in performance . . . and they know it.

The writers who put this out are rewarded by activity as it generates readership and advertising dollars. How many writers gain readership by praising a team for staying the course? How many writers try to generate a grudge against a player themselves and write about how the GM being too attached because it doesn't serve their agenda?

SJeasy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 05:39 PM
  #15
Fatturdmanshark
Kiss my Fins
 
Fatturdmanshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New Mexico
Country: United States
Posts: 1,214
vCash: 500
any team other than SJ, flying anywhere to meet with marleau on monday is blatant tampering..Sorry Eklund...

Fatturdmanshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 05:43 PM
  #16
JonathanK81
Registered User
 
JonathanK81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The OC
Country: United States
Posts: 529
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoundsHansen32 View Post
any team other than SJ, flying anywhere to meet with marleau on monday is blatant tampering..Sorry Eklund...
I laugh at people who have no clue what they're saying. Obviously it's tampering, I'm sure even Eklund knows this. I assume if they are meeting with Marleau, they got permission to do so. Thus it's not tampering. I don't think any of this will happen, but I'm sure it's not tampering, not in this case atleast.

JonathanK81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 05:46 PM
  #17
LadyStanley
Elasmobranchology-go
 
LadyStanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North of the Tank
Country: United States
Posts: 55,604
vCash: 500
DW has stated he will not "trade for trade's sake" (or just because the media is pushing for "something" or someone to be gone/come).

DW has also stated that if he makes a trade, acquiring a person, he's looking to "upgrade" that person/position (or in another spot on the roster).

I don't recall if he's commented specifically on if a player requested a trade, but he seems the type (and there's a background in the organization) such that he'd do all he can to accommodate any request. (Think of Traverse who was picked up on waivers and then reacquired just before Christmas so he could be with family.)

The organization has worked to get specific players (or types of players) into specific roster spots. If they have excess/surfeit then they might trade those folks away. (Or if they cannot, do their best to give them a great opportunity in the AHL, ala McLaren. Who he tried to "give" away.) But it also allows for the best players to make it to the NHL roster, on merit/skills; no gimmes.

Has DW kept some players longer than he should? In hindsight, yes (in some cases). But not everyone can foresee all aspects of the future.

Does DW over value players? Maybe a little, but he's not about to trade a "decent" player making $2m for a similar player making $5m without some kind of additional incentive.

Is he too attached? I think the longer he's been a GM, the more he's able to look beyond his feelings WRT the players. I hope there's someone in the organization whose opinion he'll listen to and value so that he's not overcome by sentimentality when faced with hard decisions.

This summer, I think the anger and disappointment allowed him the opportunity to take a long look at *every* player in the organization and make hard decisions WRT some by not bringing them back. There still may be players packing for SJ that won't be in the opening night lineup (due to trade).

DW has stated that the team he's looking to put together for this season's run through the playoffs will not be in place until around the trade deadline (early March). So, there could be some key folks in the lineup October 1st who won't be around come April 13.

LadyStanley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 05:47 PM
  #18
ToursLepantoVienna
Registered User
 
ToursLepantoVienna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Country:
Posts: 2,003
vCash: 500
Too attached?

To players, maybe. To draft picks, absolutely not.

ToursLepantoVienna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 05:57 PM
  #19
Fatturdmanshark
Kiss my Fins
 
Fatturdmanshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New Mexico
Country: United States
Posts: 1,214
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathan360 View Post
I laugh at people who have no clue what they're saying. Obviously it's tampering, I'm sure even Eklund knows this. I assume if they are meeting with Marleau, they got permission to do so. Thus it's not tampering. I don't think any of this will happen, but I'm sure it's not tampering, not in this case atleast.
so youre laughing at what i said as being the fact, but what you assume is somehow more credible? HA!

Fatturdmanshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 05:59 PM
  #20
bigwillie
Registered User
 
bigwillie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Country: United States
Posts: 5,881
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to bigwillie
If by "too attached" you mean patient, rational, and level-headed, then yes, DW's too attached. Just because he didn't throw a temper tantrum and trade half the roster after the playoffs doesn't mean he's afraid to make move. He's examining the situation very carefully and is going to do what's truly best for the team, not what will please the fans for the time being.

bigwillie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 06:01 PM
  #21
5H4RK5
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,653
vCash: 500
.............like crazy glue. I would show all the loyalty and respect to a player only if they meet the basic criteria of hockey, attitude and production. If they have the attitude but no production, it's time to move on in a kind way.

5H4RK5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 06:02 PM
  #22
OneTooth
Registered User
 
OneTooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Jose, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 596
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyStanley View Post
DW has stated that the team he's looking to put together for this season's run through the playoffs will not be in place until around the trade deadline (early March). So, there could be some key folks in the lineup October 1st who won't be around come April 13.
I haved a problem with this. I can't imagine it will be good for the moral in the locker room. Can you imagine how PM would play knowing there's a high probability he'll be traded at the deadline? MM, Cheech, etc. as well? The trade rumors would be a huge distraction.

DW is treading dangerous waters. He's already called out the core. If he keeps dragging his feet on finalizing the core he could do more damage than good.

OneTooth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 06:07 PM
  #23
5H4RK5
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,653
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by OneTooth View Post
I haved a problem with this. I can't imagine it will be good for the moral in the locker room. Can you imagine how PM would play knowing there's a high probability he'll be traded at the deadline? MM, Cheech, etc. as well? The trade rumors would be a huge distraction.

DW is treading dangerous waters. He's already called out the core. If he keeps dragging his feet on finalizing the core he could do more damage than good.
That's the business of hockey. Trades happen all the time if the right pieces are available. Every player should do there job to the best effort and usually the outcome is well in the end. SJ is definitely one of the most tight nit groups in all the league if not the most which is good because they say that teams that stay together play together..............well. If guys are slacking while others are doing all the work, changes have to be made. If a player does there job and goes above and beyond every time they are on the ice in terms of effort then they shouldn't be worried at all.


Last edited by 5H4RK5: 08-16-2009 at 06:25 PM.
5H4RK5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 06:41 PM
  #24
JonathanK81
Registered User
 
JonathanK81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The OC
Country: United States
Posts: 529
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoundsHansen32 View Post
so youre laughing at what i said as being the fact, but what you assume is somehow more credible? HA!
Yes, exactly. What I said is absolutely more credible. Most if not all GMs would not fly to meet with a player unless they got permission to do so. Why would a GM risk everything to talk to a player without the permission of the team? Simple as that. Again, I doubt they're actually meeting Marleau because I don't think he'll be traded, but I'm sure if they do speak to him, they did seek permission first.

And it's quite simple really, if what Eklund said is true (which is debateable) then Doug Wilson either gave them permission or will be seeking tampering charges. How much do you want to bet that no tampering charges will be filed?

JonathanK81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-16-2009, 06:46 PM
  #25
TheGooooch
HFBoards Sponsor
 
TheGooooch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Francisco
Country: United States
Posts: 17,861
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathan360 View Post
Yes, exactly. What I said is absolutely more credible. Most if not all GMs would not fly to meet with a player unless they got permission to do so. Why would a GM risk everything to talk to a player without the permission of the team? Simple as that. Again, I doubt they're actually meeting Marleau because I don't think he'll be traded, but I'm sure if they do speak to him, they did seek permission first.
You have to get permission. I believe they would be tampering if they didn't get permission, which is punishable by the NHL.

IF any of this actually happened, then I would assume that Marleau is gone. I wouldn't really think that he would want to come back after something of this nature occurs (Wilson going as far as having another teams GM come and try and talk him into coming to their city)

Edit: Jonathan edited his after I quoted him. He might have seen my intelligent response and decided to copy me

TheGooooch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.