Nyr-cbj

Beacon · 08-17-2009, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmundus

$$$$$$$$$$$$$ modin contract is done after this season, NYR need a D coming back if rangers trade one and a big stay at home is what rangers need.

Rosie doesn't have negative value. If he'll be traded, an asset will come back. Rosie is more valuable than Gomez, easily.

bmundus · 08-17-2009, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrooklynHockey99

Rosie doesn't have negative value. If he'll be traded, an asset will come back. Rosie is more valuable than Gomez, easily.

rozy could have gotten the same package that Gomez got? no way.

CanyonofBlueshirts · 08-17-2009, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmundus

if we get savard back then dubi is expendable. especially with stepan developing the way he is.

cant solve every problem through free agency. dubinsky is absolutely not expendable.

Beacon · 08-17-2009, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmundus

rozy could have gotten the same package that Gomez got? no way.

Montreal got killed in that trade, but the point is that everyone in the business agreed that Gomez had real value. It wasn't like Gainey wanted to pay and everyone else from scouts to the President screamed no.

I do think that Rosie can bring back a second line player or a third liner plus a good prospect. He's a very solid #2 defenseman.

bmundus · 08-17-2009, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheManicRanger

cant solve every problem through free agency. dubinsky is absolutely not expendable.

so you would not trade dubi for savard?

nyr2k2 · 08-17-2009, 02:55 PM

If we get rid of Dubinsky, we have, what, two forwards from last season? I know the season was a train wreck offensively, but man... There's something to be said for continuity.

CM Lundqvist · 08-17-2009, 02:56 PM

I would do the trade in the other thread centered around Rozsival and Klesla, or something bringing Tyutin back.

bmundus · 08-17-2009, 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nyr2k2

If we get rid of Dubinsky, we have, what, two forwards from last season? I know the season was a train wreck offensively, but man... There's something to be said for continuity.

sather did that already. what i want to do is set the team up for the future. i could give a rats ass about next season if we are just going to get bounced out again in the first round.
what i want is to have a true number one line.
kuvy-dubi-gaby or
cally-savard-gaby
after that it will be all our prospects getting to play.
so yes i do take the team apart a bit but its so there can be a team that will play for the next 4-6 years together. right now its going to be hard to sign our young players.

CanyonofBlueshirts · 08-17-2009, 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmundus

so you would not trade dubi for savard?

no absolutely not, unless dubinsky fails miserably centering gaborik. no. why even talk about a trade for a number one center without seeing if dubi can get the job done? trading him now would follow the same ******** mentality thats hampered the rangers for years.

bmundus · 08-17-2009, 03:10 PM

i want to see some of this on the rangers

bmundus · 08-17-2009, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheManicRanger

no absolutely not, unless dubinsky fails miserably centering gaborik. no. why even talk about a trade for a number one center without seeing if dubi can get the job done? trading him now would follow the same ******** mentality thats hampered the rangers for years.

i only want to trade him if it looks like we cant sign him long term. right now thats what is being said.