Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.
Dallas looking for puck moving D,Brunnstrom available
10-11-2009, 11:49 AM
#26
Global Moderator
BRING ON THE PENS
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: mtl/ott/somewhere
Country:
Posts: 27,737
how about chris campoli + for Brunnstrom?
__________________
Last edited by danishh: 10-11-2009 at 11:54 AM .
10-11-2009, 11:53 AM
#27
Welcome Back
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Country:
Posts: 3,651
Quote:
Originally Posted by
S2S
If only Kaberle could be moved....
I'll go with this one, or you could add Turco and its good, but maybe
Dallas:
Kabrele
Toskala
Toronto:
2010 First
Turco
Brunnstrom
2010 4th
10-11-2009, 11:57 AM
#28
Amok
Join Date: Feb 2007
Country:
Posts: 13,008
Toronto should trade Kaberle to get a 1st and more back.
Last edited by Kamina: 10-11-2009 at 12:05 PM .
10-11-2009, 12:00 PM
#29
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 3,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Steven93
I'll go with this one, or you could add Turco and its good, but maybe
No, trading 1 problem for another, no puck moving D for a crappier goaltender. As crappy as Turco has been I would much rather have him than Toskala. Plus too much going back to TO.
10-11-2009, 01:12 PM
#30
Global Moderator
they told me I could
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: be anything
Posts: 26,771
Brunnstrom isn't going anywhere.
10-11-2009, 01:49 PM
#31
Remember #9
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Netherlands
Country:
Posts: 23,102
I like Brunnstrom, and I actually think he has the potential to be a perennial 30 goal scorer, but he's the Stars best trading chip in terms of value and because of the fact he's the most expandable forward among the top 9.
10-11-2009, 01:52 PM
#32
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ADDISON
Country:
Posts: 696
how about this
10-11-2009, 01:55 PM
#33
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ADDISON
Country:
Posts: 696
campbell is always available from the hawks....probably wouldnt cost ya much either just have to take on that cap hit...but you can add him without sacraficing brunstrom or any other top roster player
10-11-2009, 02:01 PM
#34
ITS PLAYOFFS TIME!!!
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Waterloo, ON
Country:
Posts: 14,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by
xicethug13x
how about thisadd in hagman to if need be
Hagman isn't some kind of throw in. He is good forward capable of 20 goals and 50 pts.
Leafs will never do that deal. U want Kaberle
AND Tlusty,
AND Hagman?
No thanks, we need Kaberle. If he goes, we are a lock for a bottom 5 finish.
10-11-2009, 02:02 PM
#35
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Victoria, BC
Country:
Posts: 24,958
Pens may be able to use Brunnstrom but i think Shero wants to keep Gonchar, Letang, and Goligoski. Can't have too many of them.
10-11-2009, 02:02 PM
#36
Remember #9
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Netherlands
Country:
Posts: 23,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by
xicethug13x
how about this
That's a lot of potential for Dallas to trade away. Vincour is tought of well in the Stars system, while that first could be anything, from a bottom 10 pick to a lottery pick. Dallas would thankfully decline, me thinks.
10-11-2009, 02:39 PM
#37
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver
Country:
Posts: 873
I don't know if either team wants to do it...but Campbell would look good on that Stars roster and Dallas has the cap space...
10-11-2009, 02:41 PM
#38
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Karlstad
Country:
Posts: 8,140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nuckfan in TO
He had "demands" before signing with a team thinking he had earned that,
? What?
The only demand he had was to be welcomed at the airport and showed around. He was a free agent and was not forced to sign for any one.
10-11-2009, 02:46 PM
#39
Global Moderator
they told me I could
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: be anything
Posts: 26,771
Campbell is terrible and I want him nowhere near the Stars.
10-11-2009, 02:54 PM
#40
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver
Country:
Posts: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by
piqued1457
Campbell is terrible and I want him nowhere near the Stars.
Be that as it may, he fits the need right now....despite his horrific contract. But you may be able to weasel some more out of Chicago just to take on his contract.
10-11-2009, 03:52 PM
#41
Give the dog a bone
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: hf retirement home
Country:
Posts: 47,632
well from an oilers perspective
__________________
10-11-2009, 04:02 PM
#42
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago
Country:
Posts: 10,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by
piqued1457
Campbell is terrible and I want him nowhere near the Stars.
Ok, sure.
10-11-2009, 04:07 PM
#43
Best Threadkiller
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Country:
Posts: 4,981
Quote:
Originally Posted by
piqued1457
Campbell's contract is terrible and I want it nowhere near the Stars.
Fixed.
10-11-2009, 04:08 PM
#44
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 38
Gilbert + Nilsson + Pouliot
10-11-2009, 04:10 PM
#45
Best Threadkiller
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Country:
Posts: 4,981
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dand
Gilbert + Nilsson + Pouliot
No, no and doubly no. Edmonton might have nice puck moving D... but we don't have size to give to you for your top 6.
Gilbert for Daley.
10-11-2009, 04:21 PM
#46
Registered Abuser
Join Date: Jan 2006
Country:
Posts: 2,508
Not that Id want to see him traded but Liles?
10-11-2009, 04:21 PM
#47
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 14,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dand
Gilbert + Nilsson + Pouliot
Dallas would do that, IMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWC
No, no and doubly no. Edmonton might have nice puck moving D... but we don't have size to give to you for your top 6.
What are you talking about regarding size? Gilbert is a better defenseman than Daley.
10-11-2009, 04:48 PM
#48
Give the dog a bone
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: hf retirement home
Country:
Posts: 47,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWC
No, no and doubly no. Edmonton might have nice puck moving D... but we don't have size to give to you for your top 6.
It would have to be Gilbert for Daley +
I don't see the oilers having any interest in moving a 6-3 puck moving d-man for a 5-10
Gilbert is a better all around d-man
10-11-2009, 04:55 PM
#49
Running and Rioting
Join Date: Aug 2008
Country:
Posts: 12,097
Picard/Zubov for Brunnstrom
10-11-2009, 04:57 PM
#50
Best Threadkiller
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Country:
Posts: 4,981
I don't think + is needed...Edmonton needs cap space to sign Cogliano/Grebeshkov/Brule/Gagner next year... 1.7mil in space is worth SOMETHING to Edmonton.
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 PM .
monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
