HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > Philadelphia Flyers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Tough to grade Flyers this season

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-03-2010, 11:15 AM
  #1
MiamiScreamingEagles
Global Moderator
A Fistful of Dollars
 
MiamiScreamingEagles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 42,894
vCash: 2563
Tough to grade Flyers this season

Wayne Fish's grades. We can open this for discussion...

Quote:

It's the halfway point in the Flyers' season today and that means it's time to hand out the notorious mid-term grades.

This won't be any easy task, mainly because the team has experienced such an up-and-down season.

Do you judge on the first 18 games of the season (12-5-1), the second 17 (3-13-1) or the last five (4-0-1)?

Keep in mind, this marker favors players who overachieve, ones who go above and beyond expectations. On the flip side, players who underachieve are judged accordingly.

Let's take a crack at these grades and see if we can agree on a few:
http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/news...-season-1.html

MiamiScreamingEagles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-03-2010, 11:19 AM
  #2
1865
Registered User
 
1865's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chester, UK
Country: England
Posts: 10,200
vCash: 500
Coburn too high, carter too low.

1865 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-03-2010, 11:21 AM
  #3
DUHockey9
Registered User
 
DUHockey9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Hogwarts
Country: United States
Posts: 4,472
vCash: 500
The grade for Coburn makes me think this guy doesn't have a clue. There is no way Coburn is a C+ while Betts or Powe are C's. If C is more or less being what is expected, I think it's obvious Coburn is playing well below expectations whereas Betts and Powe are playing probably slightly better than I expected them to.

DUHockey9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-03-2010, 11:21 AM
  #4
Cleary84
Registered User
 
Cleary84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 2,424
vCash: 500
I disagree with giving both Powe and Betts a C just because of time missed from injuries. They are excellent role players, Betts does his job whenever needed and Powe provides good energy.

I'd give Powe a B and Betts a B+

Cleary84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-03-2010, 11:27 AM
  #5
RIPRichardsCarter
Registered User
 
RIPRichardsCarter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,954
vCash: 500
I wish they wouldn't grade them based on their injuries. It's not really fair.

I agree with most though.

RIPRichardsCarter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-03-2010, 11:39 AM
  #6
CS
Bryzgalov's Blueline
 
CS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lumberton, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 14,009
vCash: 500
Basically the article's logic is full of loopholes, fantastic idealizations for some players, and over-exaggerated problems for others.

It's always hard to make grades, but he seems to be doing a combination of grading players on result vs. expectation as well as just flat out grading their play.

You can't really combine both in one go and say, "Here, this is how so and so has played."

That's what leads to Michael Leighton being an A+. His play hasn't warranted such, but the sensationalism of a win streak along with a defense rallying fantastically in front of a weak goaltender has created this grade.

I think Michael Leighton has done a great job, but this article suggests it was because he's magically turned into some solid goaltender which is far from the truth.

There's other problems as well. He rewards Leighton for basically only playing 5 games. You think he would've won much a month ago? How many other players on this list were dropped because they haven't played enough games?


Last edited by CS: 01-03-2010 at 11:45 AM.
CS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-03-2010, 11:47 AM
  #7
GKJ
Global Moderator
Entertainment
 
GKJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Do not trade plz
Country: United States
Posts: 116,467
vCash: 450
Leighton gets an A+ but Betts and Powe are penalized for being injured. Leighton was on waivers twice, although irrelevant since it wasn't the Flyers doing it.

Leighton is what he is, he's done well, but ultimately he's playing just to earn another shot with someone down the road, here or somewhere else.

__________________
Philadelphia's Real Alternative
(ynotradio.net)

Stop Feeding the Rumor-Monger

"I wonder if Norstrom has Forsberg's spleen mounted on his wall." - KINGS17

My 50 Favorite Albums of 2014 (sorry it's late)
GKJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-03-2010, 12:05 PM
  #8
DrinkFightFlyers
Provolone & The Neck
 
DrinkFightFlyers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NJ
Country: Isle of Man
Posts: 14,717
vCash: 470
Send a message via AIM to DrinkFightFlyers
meh.

DrinkFightFlyers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-03-2010, 12:48 PM
  #9
L-train*
 
L-train*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Philly Suburbs
Country: United States
Posts: 3,037
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to L-train*
My Grades... changed the text I didn't agree with and left what I agreed with.


B-: Michael Leighton: Played solid and benefitted from good bounces through an unexpected 4 game winning streak.

B+: Matt Carle: Still young, has improved dramatically this season, however, how much of that is because of Pronger?

A-: Ian Laperriere: Fearless shot blocker, plays defense, willing to fight

B+: Chris Pronger: Stable presence and consistent play has helped the blue line solidify.

C+: Claude Giroux: Notorious slow starter, beginning to pick it up.

D: Mike Richards: No excuse for a team of this caliber to play as poor as they were playing up until about 5 games ago. Not producing offensively as expected.

C: James van Riemsdyk: Started fast, dropped off like a rock. Rigors of an 82 game regular season schedule appear to be wearing on him.

C-: Kimmo Timonen: Play has been less than stellar, and far behind prior years. Has played a little better as of late.

B+: Oskars Bartulis: Although a rookie, he plays as if he has at least 5 years of NHL experience under his belt.

B: Daniel Carcillo: Hard to believe given his penalty total but he's played well

B-: Brian Boucher: Despite his 4-10-1 record, has filled in well for starter Ray Emery

D: Braydon Coburn: Has played quite poorly and is now regulated to third line duties. His poor play may help the Flyers retain him once his contracts up, but will they want to? Has shown no indications of becoming the D-Man everybody thought he was going to be.

C: Simon Gagne: Injuries are becoming a problem.

B-: Daniel Briere: Brings it every night, and produces offense even when nobody else is.

D+: Scott Hartnell: Stupid penalties, just as years prior, but reduced offensive output gives him no excuse for his poor play.

C: Ray Emery: Started hot, faltered presumably due to injury, should have had surgery earlier.

C-: Jeff Carter: 46 goals a year ago, on pace for less than 30 this year.

C+: Danny Syvret: Nice surprise callup. Got his first goal in the WC.

C: Arron Asham: If only the man didn't have hands of stone...

C+: Blair Betts: Valuable penalty killer, face-off man, just hasn't played much

B-: Darroll Powe: Pretty much the same story as Betts

C-: Ryan Parent: Should be playing better than this and too injury-prone

D: Riley Cote: Questionable NHL player.

D-: Mika Pyorala: Needs more seasoning to get used to the North American style, imho.

D+: Ole-Kristian Tollefsen: Talk about glass...

Coach

C: Peter Laviolette: Team still isn't performing up to standards, but his system seems solid, and it appears the players are finally beginning to play well under him.

General manager

C-: Paul Holmgren: A slightly below average GM in terms of cap management and trades. Made a good move picking up Leighton, or maybe a lucky move.

L-train* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-03-2010, 01:22 PM
  #10
TheTaekster
Registered User
 
TheTaekster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 94.1 and 97.5
Country: United States
Posts: 1,075
vCash: 500
Homer didn't bring in enough depth players? What? We can't score....

TheTaekster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-03-2010, 06:37 PM
  #11
jb**
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Planet Lovetron
Country: Italy
Posts: 8,556
vCash: 500
A team that is near the bottom of the league shouldnt have that many players with a high grade. Comical really. This team is one of the biggest underachieving teams i have seen in a long time. No d or f's? unreal

jb** is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2010, 05:59 PM
  #12
Scoopyten
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 899
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MiamiScreamingEagles View Post
Wayne Fish's grades. We can open this for discussion...



http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/news...-season-1.html
He was way too nice.

Pronger deserves no more than a C. He's been a huge disappointment for me. Coburn's been garbage most of the year. Cote doesn't even deserve a grade.

Scoopyten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2010, 06:09 PM
  #13
Jester
Registered User
 
Jester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Andrews
Country: Scotland
Posts: 34,075
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSaq View Post
He was way too nice.

Pronger deserves no more than a C. He's been a huge disappointment for me. Coburn's been garbage most of the year. Cote doesn't even deserve a grade.
Tough to say on Pronger. He was incredibly good the first 18 games, but has proven unable to keep his individual play at that level when everything else went to **** around him.

Coburn is a mess.

Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2010, 06:18 PM
  #14
Scoopyten
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 899
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jester View Post
Tough to say on Pronger. He was incredibly good the first 18 games, but has proven unable to keep his individual play at that level when everything else went to **** around him.

Coburn is a mess.
What bothers me most was the "great leadership" comment. Pronger's shown the exact opposite. He cried to the media about Richards' not asking him for help, rather than going to the kid behind the scenes and offer it.

Then as the level of play goes to Hell, he talks about looking in the mirror, but his play was down, too. He's played OK, but the price paid to get him was to get an elite player, not a good solid player.

Scoopyten is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.