HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > Philadelphia Flyers
Notices

(from summer 2010) Gagne for Tim Thomas

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
06-20-2010, 10:56 AM
  #1
FreshPerspective
We don't need one!
 
FreshPerspective's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Country: Italy
Posts: 10,260
vCash: 500
(from summer 2010) Gagne for Tim Thomas

Interesting write up by Meltzer.....I wouldn't be against it necessarily. Flyers really only have a 2 yr window to win this evasive cup. I like the idea of keeping the D stacked and I hope that is the case. Move Gagne to Boston for Thomas who although old is definitely still capable....maybe even get Recchi for a year on the cheap which he is willing.

Quote:
The acquisition of Dan Hamhuis to the Flyers' defense corps gives the Flyers the best 1-to-5 group that I ever remember the team assembling. From what I understand, Hamhuis' addition will not affect the club's efforts to resign restricted free agent Braydon Coburn (who made $1.3 million last season), nor will the club actively shop Matt Carle (who has two seasons left at a $3.4 million cap hit).

The team wants to be as stacked as possible on the blueline, in order to relieve some regular season minutes from Chris Pronger and Kimmo Timonen, be better able to withstand injuries, and provide head coach Peter Laviolette more options when he needs to juggle defense pairings.

The number six defenseman, by necessity, will be a low-salaried youngster. Oskars Bartulis has the inside track but will have competition at training camp. It remains to be seen if any among Kevin Marshall (who would carry an $875,000 cap hit on the NHL end of his entry-level contract), Joonas Lehtivuori ($850,000), Denis Bodrov, Marc-Andre Bourdon or Erik Gustafsson are ready or able to push Bartulis. The club may not carry a seventh defenseman to start the season. Danny Syvret, a restricted free agent, made a prorated $575,000 last season during his time with the big club. Bartulis will make $600,000 for the next three seasons after signing a long-term contract during last season.
On a Gagne trade

Quote:
According to multiple sources, Paul Holmgren has been inquiring about goaltender trade possibilities -- both for veteran keepers and youngsters -- on a virtually league-wide basis, and the trade route rather than signing a free agent appears to be the club's preferred method to landing a starting goalie for next year.

One rumor that surfaced yesterday was that the Boston Bruins are dangling Tim Thomas, who has three years left on a contract that carries a $5 million cap hit. The 36-year-old Thomas, who was the 2008-09 Vezina Trophy winner but lost his starting job to Tuukka Rask over the course of last season, will make $6 million in actual dollars this season.

While Thomas would be a significant upgrade over any of the goaltenders the Flyers used last season and his competitive nature would play well with the Philly crowd, his age and contract length are definitely major concerns. So is the fact that, although Rask is the present and future for the Bruins in goal, the club has allegedly set its sights high on a return it wants to for Thomas.

I don't know specifically what Boston wants but, through process of elimination, I arrived at Simon Gagne as the most logical trade fit if he's willing to waive his no-trade.

You aren't going to trade Jeff Carter for a goalie Thomas' age, nor is the organization deep enough prospect-wise to be able to easily move Claude Giroux or James Van Riemsdyk. That would leave Gagne as the most desirable remaining target, if he's willing to go to a Boston team that struggled offensively all last season and saw first-hand in the playoffs that Gagne still has some clutch goals left in him. Gagne would also be a fairly close cap-figure match to Thomas and plays a two-way game that's a must to be a fit for the Bruins' system.

Will it happen? I have no idea. There are too many variables and alternative possibilities. But it is an interesting possibility to debate. From a Boston perspective, it would add to their forward corps, give them a year to evaluate whether they want to commit a long-term extension to the 30-year-old Gagne and they still have Rask in goal. For the Flyers, the loss of Gagne would sting a little, but they would have a good shot at another run to the Finals with an upgrade in goal, an already-upgraded defense and a forward lineup that while not with its share of question marks has the potential to be offensively potent.
Source:http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Bill-...20-10/45/28883


Last edited by MiamiScreamingEagles: 10-22-2010 at 10:48 PM.
FreshPerspective is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 11:02 AM
  #2
FlyHigh
Registered User
 
FlyHigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 28,156
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to FlyHigh Send a message via MSN to FlyHigh
Damn I don't want to trade Gags, at least let him finish out his deal here.

I can see them trying to get away with keeping Coburn/Carle/Hamhuis, but that means they'll need an epic salary dump after next year and they'll be dealing from a position of weakness.

I mean, why not just trade Carle, sign Turco, and see what you have in Bobro and Eriksson before you start giving up assets for a young goalie?

FlyHigh is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 11:02 AM
  #3
Hockeypete49
How you like me now!
 
Hockeypete49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Jersey
Country: Isle of Man
Posts: 4,465
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDoom View Post
Interesting write up by Melzer.....I wouldn't be against it necessarily. Flyers really only have a 2 yr window to win this evasive cup. I like the idea of keeping the D stacked and I hope that is the case. Move Gagne to Boston for Thomas who although old is definitely still capable....maybe even get Recchi for a year on the cheap which he is willing.



On a Gagne trade



Source:http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Bill-...20-10/45/28883
Flyers get hosed here, No way

Hockeypete49 is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 11:04 AM
  #4
JCameron418
Registered User
 
JCameron418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,448
vCash: 500
Bad deal. A 36 year old goalie with that high of a cap hit isn't worth giving anything valuable for. Boston should be begging teams to take him away at this point.

JCameron418 is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 11:13 AM
  #5
dgaspari
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 160
vCash: 500
people who keep making these thomas proposals need to understand THIS IS A SALARY CAPPED LEAGUE.. no team is going to take on a major salary commitment for a 36 yr old over the hill player. i believe that teams like the flyers who are up against the cap will only move high end players for prospects and draft picks. i believe that the st louis / montreal trade will be the model for all flyers transactions

dgaspari is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 11:25 AM
  #6
RoDu
Shagga likes axes
 
RoDu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,444
vCash: 500
Thomas is way to old and makes way to much to make him a target

RoDu is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 11:28 AM
  #7
PhillyCurt12
Registered User
 
PhillyCurt12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,007
vCash: 500
i have a counter offer:

we keep gagne, the bruins keep thomas, we sign turco, we trade carle for picks/prospects/3rd line d-man

PhillyCurt12 is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 11:32 AM
  #8
healthyscratch
Registered User
 
healthyscratch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philly
Posts: 5,082
vCash: 500
Good god no. 36 year old Tim Thomas and 3 more years at 5 million per on the cap????

$%#& NO!!!!! At those numbers they should be paying teams to take him off their hands, not expecting Gagne in return.

Any just in case I wasn't clear enough....


ABOSOLUTELY %$#&ING NOT!!!!!!

healthyscratch is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 12:01 PM
  #9
Haute Couturier
Registered User
 
Haute Couturier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 5,972
vCash: 500
I dont like it because he ha a 35+ contract but I could see Homer doing it.

Haute Couturier is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 12:04 PM
  #10
MsWoof
Registered User
 
MsWoof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,865
vCash: 500
No, no, a thousand times no! Thomas can stay in Boston, thanks.

MsWoof is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 12:07 PM
  #11
DeadPhish5858
Rumham!
 
DeadPhish5858's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: the Shade
Country: United States
Posts: 13,476
vCash: 200
Send a message via AIM to DeadPhish5858
Boston is going to have to add alot to get rid of Thomas. Its a bad contract so they have to be prepared to add something for a team to take it off their hands.

DeadPhish5858 is online now  
Old
06-20-2010, 12:12 PM
  #12
ToTheNet
Registered User
 
ToTheNet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Holland, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 3,281
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to ToTheNet
We'll trade them Gags for Thomas if they also give us their 1st/2nd round pick and possibly a decent wing prospect. . . that is the only way this deal gets done

ToTheNet is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 12:14 PM
  #13
Garbage Goal
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 17,082
vCash: 500
Gagne for Thomas is probably the second worst thing Homer could do to this team this off-season. The

Garbage Goal is online now  
Old
06-20-2010, 12:15 PM
  #14
Cinerary
The Inexorable
 
Cinerary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: West Chester, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 2,581
vCash: 500
Hell no.

Cinerary is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 12:30 PM
  #15
no1b4me
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 240
vCash: 500
Say no to Thomas and Turco.

no1b4me is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 12:33 PM
  #16
dbr2
Lockout Beard
 
dbr2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 9,340
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to dbr2
Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

dbr2 is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 12:38 PM
  #17
infidelappel*
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,507
vCash: 500
No way...first off, Gagne's importance to this team is underrated. Secondly, why would we take on such an awful contract for an aging goaltender?

Gagne's cap hit will go down after this year if we choose to keep him...no reason to do this deal.

infidelappel* is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 12:41 PM
  #18
JDinkalage Morgoone
U of South Flurrida
 
JDinkalage Morgoone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 308 Negra Arroyo Ln.
Country: Uzbekistan
Posts: 11,579
vCash: 50
Nay I say, Gagne's great 2 way play and scoring is necessary to our success

__________________
"Help was not promised, lovely girl. Only death."
JDinkalage Morgoone is online now  
Old
06-20-2010, 12:48 PM
  #19
CS
Bryzgalov's Blueline
 
CS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lumberton, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 13,984
vCash: 500
Thomas + 2nd overall for Gagne

See? I can be innovative.

CS is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 12:50 PM
  #20
FlyerEra2010
Registered User
 
FlyerEra2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lakeville, MN
Country: United States
Posts: 927
vCash: 500
I'd be pretty disappointed if this happened.

I like Thomas' demeanor, but he's not good enough for a 5 million dollar cap hit. And I'd hope we wouldn't trade Gagne unless it gave us some actual cap relief.

FlyerEra2010 is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 01:24 PM
  #21
A Clerk
Schennergy
 
A Clerk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vilnius
Country: Lithuania
Posts: 247
vCash: 500
Would you guys be against bringing Nitty back for a cheap option?

A Clerk is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 01:27 PM
  #22
Larry44
FlyersTankNation
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,066
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadPhish5858 View Post
Boston is going to have to add alot to get rid of Thomas. Its a bad contract so they have to be prepared to add something for a team to take it off their hands.
Gagne for Thomas and one of their top prospects, like Jordan Caron or Joe Colborne. They have to pay a premium to ditch that contract. How about the Leafs' 2nd round pick?

Larry44 is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 01:28 PM
  #23
Start Leighton*
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Country: Italy
Posts: 3,099
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by A Clerk View Post
Would you guys be against bringing Nitty back for a cheap option?
I would take Biron back over Nitty hands down.

Start Leighton* is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 01:31 PM
  #24
Haute Couturier
Registered User
 
Haute Couturier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 5,972
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry44 View Post
Gagne for Thomas and one of their top prospects, like Jordan Caron or Joe Colborne. They have to pay a premium to ditch that contract. How about the Leafs' 2nd round pick?
I'd want their first, the 15th overall.

Haute Couturier is offline  
Old
06-20-2010, 01:34 PM
  #25
Larry44
FlyersTankNation
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,066
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Libertine View Post
I'd want their first, the 15th overall.
Good point. And they should throw in Blake Wheeler too.

Larry44 is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.