HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Calgary Flames
Notices

Should the Flames tank next season?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
06-27-2010, 07:50 PM
  #26
King In The North
Sean Bennett
 
King In The North's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hamilton, On
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,330
vCash: 500
No player would accept losing for a chance to bring in a guy who MIGHT help the team. There are a lot of consequences that go with rebuilding and players wouldn't risk being traded or damaging their career to bring in one player.

Our mentality is to win, no matter how difficult it will be.

King In The North is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2010, 08:08 PM
  #27
Hyperkookeez*
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cowtown
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,931
vCash: 500
There is no guarantee Sutter would use that pick wisely.

If the Flames are going to be mediocre, we might as well see them try and win something

Hyperkookeez* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2010, 09:15 PM
  #28
Flames 1st pick
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,030
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyperkookeez View Post
There is no guarantee Sutter would use that pick wisely.

:

This...


Plus with the prospects in the system, they will have to tank at least 5 yrs to build a contender.

Flames 1st pick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2010, 11:58 PM
  #29
BeerWingsHockey
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 67
vCash: 500
Just because this has worked for a couple of Stanley Cup champs in the past few years doesn't mean we should herald the technique of tanking. You can't forget that


1. Deep drafts aren't a yearly phenomenon
2. Pittsburgh, or Chicago for that matter, hasn't won the merit of dynasty quite yet...
3. Edmonton.... uh... yeah!

I think you need to look at dynasties - like Detroit, who often don't draft high, but have good systems of development for their youngsters. Only one team can win the Stanley cup, but most teams that have been contenders for the cup on a regular basis have not had the luxury of drafting in the top 10. I would far prefer regular season wins and occasional Stanley Cup attempts than a series of losses for a crapshoot at the draft.

That being said, I think the Flames need to spend more money on scouting, maybe seeking out more European talent in their later picks (thinking Datsuyk, etc)....

Just my 2.

BeerWingsHockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2010, 12:20 AM
  #30
Stewie Griffin
Moderator
Benevolent Overlord
 
Stewie Griffin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,726
vCash: 1200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dallas Flames Fan View Post
This...


Plus with the prospects in the system, they will have to tank at least 5 yrs to build a contender.
The contending team we built after the young gun years of 1997 - 2002 says hello.


Stewie Griffin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.