NY Rangers ~ Pittsburgh Penguins

SirBrad · 07-20-2010, 11:13 PM

Wow, too funny.

Karitimes · 07-21-2010, 04:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmah03

Something like this would never be pulled. One it doesn't help Pitt at all. And it probably makes NY a worse team at the same time.
What team is willing to move for Fleury at this point in time? Probably no one who is looking for a #1 goalie can take on his cap of 5M
Plus who would Pitt get back for Fleury that is going to replace Malkin?

NY would have Biron and who as their backup? Sign Turco? Theodore? Really they rely a lot of Lundqvist already that would be scary for them to rely on those goalies all the time.

Moving Fleury probably isn't even possible..

There you go. You are more than obviously correct with all this. Now say that to the OP next time and 'spin off' discussions become possible.

Rowdy Roddy Peeper · 07-21-2010, 06:07 AM

durrrrrr

Giskard · 07-21-2010, 06:23 AM

Only if Malkin will play goalie for the NYR and Lundquist as Crosby's wingman

Morozov · 07-21-2010, 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Champagne Wishes

durrrrrr

hurrrrrrp?

WordUp · 07-21-2010, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Only if Malkin will play goalie for the NYR and Lundquist as Crosby's wingman

Finally, someone with some brains. Am I the only one saying yes to this proposal?

Fleury/Crosby/Lundquist = 1st line. It's brilliant.

Sour Shoes · 07-21-2010, 11:27 AM

there's only 2 people malkin would be moved for and one of them is already a pen... the other rhyme's with shmoshmechkin. (and i still would rather have malkin)

vipernsx · 07-21-2010, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILoveLuci

NYR ~ Malkin

Pens ~ Lundqvist

Your thoughts?

Malkamania · 07-21-2010, 08:11 PM

even setting aside flower is already here, and that ny would have a net that gets more action then jenna haze.......no way ever......

malkin is waaay more valuable than hank....hank is an awesome goalie but malkin is all world no matter who u stack him against.....in an off injury plagued year he put up over a ppg....

Dadude2399* · 07-21-2010, 08:17 PM

To be perfectly honest, Hank is practically a non-tradeable whatsoever for the Rangers. I wouldn't trade Hank for ANY PLAYER in the whole League.

Dadude2399* · 07-21-2010, 08:20 PM

However, I would go for this trade:
****burgh recieves Lundqvist
Rangers recieve Fleury and Malkin.

Karitimes · 07-21-2010, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dadude2399

However, I would go for this trade:
****burgh recieves Lundqvist
Rangers recieve Fleury and Malkin.

Not bad, 4 posts, 1 infraction. Welcome.

Malkamania · 07-21-2010, 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dadude2399

To be perfectly honest, Hank is practically a non-tradeable whatsoever for the Rangers. I wouldn't trade Hank for ANY PLAYER in the whole League.

is that a joke?

Fitzy · 07-21-2010, 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malkamania

is that a joke?

You haven't watched the rangers much apparently. Malkin is a better player than Lundqvist, I dont think anyone would deny that, But the rangers without a goaltender are ****ed. prison ****ed.

Of course this proposal makes no sense, because MAF is not moved, and it was never implied that he might be.

Retail1LO · 07-21-2010, 08:43 PM

I think we've heard enough. /thread?

The Perfect Paradox · 07-21-2010, 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malkamania

is that a joke?

Not at all. I don't think I would honestly trade any player in this league for Lundqvist. His value to the Rangers is way too high. Another poster earlier in the thread hit the nail on the head.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SwedeSpeedBackstrom

If the NYR ever got rid of Lunqvist they'd be picking #1 overall in the draft with or without Malkin.

PeterIng · 07-21-2010, 08:44 PM

Theres more chances of jeff finger winning the norris than anything close to this trade ever being done. Horrible, horrible, proposal, how could you?

NYRbrah · 07-21-2010, 09:33 PM

never

Crosberry87 · 07-21-2010, 09:34 PM

Are you at least sending the Pens some Preparation H??

FlyersFan61290 · 07-21-2010, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILoveLuci

NYR ~ Malkin

Pens ~ Lundqvist

Your thoughts?

Lario Melieux* · 07-21-2010, 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dadude2399

To be perfectly honest, Hank is practically a non-tradeable whatsoever for the Rangers. I wouldn't trade Hank for ANY PLAYER in the whole League.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dadude2399

However, I would go for this trade:
****burgh recieves Lundqvist
Rangers recieve Fleury and Malkin.

Lol. If you want Fleury/Malkin... try Lundqvist/Gaborik/Staal/Dubinsky. We'll have to give you back Dupuis/Talbot as salary dumps though.

Ih8theislanders · 07-21-2010, 11:15 PM

The upgrade from MAF to Lundqvist is huge, but definitely not enough to warrant Malkin.

FromTheSide · 07-21-2010, 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lario Melieux

Lol. If you want Fleury/Malkin... try Lundqvist/Gaborik/Staal/Dubinsky. We'll have to give you back Dupuis/Talbot as salary dumps though.

I see you are trying to take the crown from the OP eh?

Malkin > Gaborik (not like its a landslide either)
Lundqvist > Fleury ( need i say more?)

How in the hell do you fit dubinsky AND staal into that?

BPD · 07-21-2010, 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Myles Kilometers

This would only make sense if the Pens were allowed to play Fleury and Lundqvist at the same time.

Probably are. There has to be some kind of Crosby exception rule allowing for 2 keepers on his team to play at once.

BPD · 07-21-2010, 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lario Melieux

Lol. If you want Fleury/Malkin... try Lundqvist/Gaborik/Staal/Dubinsky. We'll have to give you back Dupuis/Talbot as salary dumps though.

Oooh, swing and a miss. BTW, your bat is in the stands. Also, you hit a kid in the 8th row. Couldn't be further off if you tried.