HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Philadelphia Flyers
Notices

Was acquiring Meszaros a good or bad idea?

View Poll Results: Was acquiring Meszaros a good or bad idea?
It was a good idea 48 39.34%
It was a bad idea 35 28.69%
Mediocre idea 39 31.97%
Voters: 122. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
07-22-2010, 03:46 PM
  #26
Valhoun*
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 10,312
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Valhoun*
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrinkFightFlyers View Post
I say good move. Meszaros has the potential to be an absolute steal if he plays the way he did when he was in Ottawa.
He does have that potential. However, what is guaranteed is that this offseason has turned next offseason into an even worse cap hell.

This time should have been used for minor tweaks and to ensure some flexibility in the salary cap next offseason.

It wasn't and this team is going to pay the price next year.

Valhoun* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 03:51 PM
  #27
Murphy7
Drop the puck
 
Murphy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Country:
Posts: 1,633
vCash: 500
Since the question is just about getting Meszaros, that was a great idea.
Everything that swirled around the move in the past 30 days, that poll would have different results.

Murphy7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 03:56 PM
  #28
Beef Invictus
Global Moderator
Stanley Cup Forum
 
Beef Invictus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Alexandria
Country: Liberia
Posts: 24,482
vCash: 567
i went with mediocre. i need to see how he's going to play with us first.

Beef Invictus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 04:02 PM
  #29
MojoJojo
Registered User
 
MojoJojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 9,334
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PycckuuRocket10 View Post
That one there is obviously no excuse for, but we couldnt trade anyone else and we needed cap space.
In large part because of the Meszaros trade. You cant blame the cap mess all on the Shelly and ODonnell signings.

I voted bad trade, but time will tell. The quality of his play could be anywhere between Redden and Timonen.

MojoJojo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 04:03 PM
  #30
turkinaa
Registered User
 
turkinaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PA
Country: United States
Posts: 915
vCash: 500
Getting a somewhat decent D is a good idea - but it was the execution. It cost us assets, messed the cap up, and while it seemed like it was all part of a plan to either trade Carle or not sign Coburn - we didn't make the follow up move. It feels like a panic move since we didn't get Hamhuis regardless that Coburn was going to be resigned or not.

So really only time will tell because it either has to (1) lead to something larger (ie large trade), (2) really make our D that much better even if we're paying most of cap in D, or (3) a terrible panic move banking on a change of scenery like Eminger.

turkinaa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 04:08 PM
  #31
Chris Shafer
Hockey's Future Staff
Bryzgalov's Blueline
 
Chris Shafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lumberton, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 12,409
vCash: 500
Meszaros move was the best move of the offseason bar none.

Chris Shafer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 04:14 PM
  #32
CTU2fan
Registered User
 
CTU2fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,021
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Shafer View Post
Meszaros move was the best move of the offseason bar none.
Well...to be fair it had to either be Meszaros or Zherdev. I'm curious how he (Meszaros) will be used, but I really think getting him was big, especially as Pronger and Timonen get older.

CTU2fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 04:19 PM
  #33
Andrew Knoll
Hockey's Future Staff
 
Andrew Knoll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Country: United States
Posts: 2,260
vCash: 500
Bad move, overpaid slightly, put us in a bad cap situation, guy is not good enough to be a top pairing guy but too good/expensive for the third pairing, he plays small/soft, etc.

Could turn out OK but as of now I don't see where anyone can defend it. We needed a third pairing? OK, that's O'Donnell and Bartulis. He is not a third pairing guy, overkill for that, yet not quite reliable enough for more regular duty. Did I mention his contract is terrible?

Andrew Knoll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 04:20 PM
  #34
Andrew Knoll
Hockey's Future Staff
 
Andrew Knoll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Country: United States
Posts: 2,260
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CTU2fan View Post
Well...to be fair it had to either be Meszaros or Zherdev. I'm curious how he (Meszaros) will be used, but I really think getting him was big, especially as Pronger and Timonen get older.
They both will disappoint us most likely but we have gotten steadier play out of Carle and Leino so maybe these reclamations projects will have similar success.

Andrew Knoll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 04:27 PM
  #35
Larry44
Rainbows&Sunshine
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,139
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadianFlyer88 View Post
I'll reserve final judgement on this one until I see the opening night roster. Right now it looks like a pretty awful deal, though (considering it cost the team Gags and hasn't improved the situation between the pipes).
I still think that they'd decided to get rid of Gagne long before Meszaros was acquired (or Hamhuis signed, if that had worked out). They had to wait until they were over the cap to ditch Gagne, so they could play the 'well, we had to get under the cap' card. Nothing Homer did 'cost' him Gagne, he was already gone.

Larry44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 04:30 PM
  #36
Larry44
Rainbows&Sunshine
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,139
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny Duberstein View Post
They both will disappoint us most likely but we have gotten steadier play out of Carle and Leino so maybe these reclamations projects will have similar success.
Disagree. I think we're going to love both Meszaros and Zherdev before the year is out. The 2003 draft was the strongest ever. Carter was 11. Richards 24th.

Zherdev was #4 for a reason. He has that level of talent, and it's not like he hasn't produced at all in the NHL, as others have pointed out.

Meszaros is a player I've always liked. Big, fast, strong, skilled, competitive.

Both guys are young and ready to blossom.

People on here complain about young D and their growing pains all the time, but Carle and Coburn proved they have it. Meszaros does too. Zherdev is going to be a star for us in a strong lineup.

Larry44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 04:37 PM
  #37
Valhoun*
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 10,312
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Valhoun*
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Shafer View Post
Meszaros move was the best move of the offseason bar none.
Grabbing Zherdev for nothing was pretty good since it doesn't hurt the team's financial future and he'll be playing to earn a big contract.

Valhoun* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 04:38 PM
  #38
mercury
Registered User
 
mercury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Philly/SoCal
Country: United States
Posts: 10,889
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry44 View Post
Disagree. I think we're going to love both Meszaros and Zherdev before the year is out. The 2003 draft was the strongest ever. Carter was 11. Richards 24th.

Zherdev was #4 for a reason. He has that level of talent, and it's not like he hasn't produced at all in the NHL, as others have pointed out.

Meszaros is a player I've always liked. Big, fast, strong, skilled, competitive.

Both guys are young and ready to blossom.

People on here complain about young D and their growing pains all the time, but Carle and Coburn proved they have it. Meszaros does too. Zherdev is going to be a star for us in a strong lineup.

Both guys are young and have a ton of potential. If they both hit, our (skater) lineup looks fantastic.

mercury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 04:43 PM
  #39
Haute Couturier
Registered User
 
Haute Couturier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 5,721
vCash: 500
Terrible. They only needed to upgrade the 3rd pairing. Spending $4M on another defenseman was ridiculous and it's even worse considering how bad he has been the last two years.

Haute Couturier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 04:48 PM
  #40
Chris Shafer
Hockey's Future Staff
Bryzgalov's Blueline
 
Chris Shafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lumberton, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 12,409
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valhoun View Post
Grabbing Zherdev for nothing was pretty good since it doesn't hurt the team's financial future and he'll be playing to earn a big contract.
Zherdev and Leino will fight for a contract next year. So, that's more of a "no risk/high reward" move. It's definitely a wait and see type of situation.

I like Meszaros because this is a move that will bolster our young blueline for a long time.

(Pronger) - Carle
(Timonen) - Coburn
Meszaros - Bartulis
(O'Donnell) - (Walker)
Lehtivuori - Gustafsson
Marshall - Bourdon
Bertilsson - Hostetter
Lauridsen - Blidstrand

( ) denotes over 26+.

Please find a reason to hate that. You can't.

Chris Shafer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 04:52 PM
  #41
Valhoun*
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 10,312
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Valhoun*
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Shafer View Post
Zherdev and Leino will fight for a contract next year. So, that's more of a "no risk/high reward" move. It's definitely a wait and see type of situation.

I like Meszaros because this is a move that will bolster our young blueline for a long time.

(Pronger) - Carle
(Timonen) - Coburn
Meszaros - Bartulis
(O'Donnell) - (Walker)
Lehtivuori - Gustafsson
Marshall - Bourdon
Bertilsson - Hostetter
Lauridsen - Blidstrand

( ) denotes over 26+.

Please find a reason to hate that. You can't.
Walker was a salary dump by the Bolts (and, to be honest, so was Mesz.)

Walker is worthless (not Shelley worthless, but who is?) and a horrible contract.

I'm cautiously optimistic about Mesz regaining his form but the caution comes from the fact that Yzerman clearly thinks that Mesz isn't that good and is severely overpaid for a long, long time.

Yzerman might be wrong, but he opinion is a pretty valuable one.

Valhoun* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 04:54 PM
  #42
chimrichalds18
the key
 
chimrichalds18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 2,653
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry44 View Post
I still think that they'd decided to get rid of Gagne long before Meszaros was acquired (or Hamhuis signed, if that had worked out). They had to wait until they were over the cap to ditch Gagne, so they could play the 'well, we had to get under the cap' card. Nothing Homer did 'cost' him Gagne, he was already gone.
I think you're right. I'm pretty sure Gagne said in an interview that they had approached him about a trade a month ago. The way all of it went down was really backwards, I'd say.

chimrichalds18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 04:56 PM
  #43
chimrichalds18
the key
 
chimrichalds18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 2,653
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valhoun View Post
Walker was a salary dump by the Bolts (and, to be honest, so was Mesz.)

Walker is worthless (not Shelley worthless, but who is?) and a horrible contract.

I'm cautiously optimistic about Mesz regaining his form but the caution comes from the fact that Yzerman clearly thinks that Mesz isn't that good and is severely overpaid for a long, long time.

Yzerman might be wrong, but he opinion is a pretty valuable one.
Yea I've thought about that as well. Why would a team that is clearly rebuilding and has a decent amount of money to spend want to get rid of a defenseman who should be hitting his prime soon and is locked up for a few years?

chimrichalds18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 04:56 PM
  #44
Chris Shafer
Hockey's Future Staff
Bryzgalov's Blueline
 
Chris Shafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lumberton, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 12,409
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valhoun View Post
Walker was a salary dump by the Bolts (and, to be honest, so was Mesz.)

Walker is worthless (not Shelley worthless, but who is?) and a horrible contract.

I'm cautiously optimistic about Mesz regaining his form but the caution comes from the fact that Yzerman clearly thinks that Mesz isn't that good and is severely overpaid for a long, long time.

Yzerman might be wrong, but he opinion is a pretty valuable one.
Yzerman is rebuilding the Bolts in his grand image. Meszaros doesn't fit in, and while you can say that a good player should always be able to find a place in the "house that Yzerman built," there is quite a bit more to it than that.

I think that there were a number of factors that went into Meszaros being moved, and I cannot possibly begin to speculate as to what they were. However, his recent play on a poor team was only one of those factors, and I can confidently say that it wasn't the most important factor.

Chris Shafer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 05:01 PM
  #45
Valhoun*
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 10,312
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Valhoun*
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Shafer View Post
Yzerman is rebuilding the Bolts in his grand image. Meszaros doesn't fit in, and while you can say that a good player should always be able to find a place in the "house that Yzerman built," there is quite a bit more to it than that.

I think that there were a number of factors that went into Meszaros being moved, and I cannot possibly begin to speculate as to what they were. However, his recent play on a poor team was only one of those factors.
You are right. If I was rebuilding a team I'd stay as far away from a young defender with tremendous upside and focus on acquiring a banged up winger on the wrong side of 30.

First, it's absurd to think that a young defenseman with top pairing potential (or even a solid #3) could be gotten for just a 2nd round pick. If the price is too good to be true... it probably is. Unlike our GM, Yzerman doesn't seem to be in the business of trading away talent and getting nothing in return.

Second, Tampa just dumped a ton of salary on the Flyers and took back none in return and turned a 4th round pick into a 2nd round pick.

Valhoun* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 05:01 PM
  #46
Garbage Goal
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 11,986
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chimrichalds18 View Post
Yea I've thought about that as well. Why would a team that is clearly rebuilding and has a decent amount of money to spend want to get rid of a defenseman who should be hitting his prime soon and is locked up for a few years?
Because he's an expensive, over-payed contract and he's been regressing for the last three or four years.

Garbage Goal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 05:14 PM
  #47
FlyerEra2010
Registered User
 
FlyerEra2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lakeville, MN
Country: United States
Posts: 927
vCash: 500
I'm a little conflicted on this one. I like Meszaros and I think he'll be a good dman for us despite regressing somewhat on the Lightning, but adding him made our defense very expensive. Might have been safer to just sign O'Donnell and play him with Bartulis as the 3rd pairing, at least to start the year. We could have made a move near the deadline if it wasn't working out, but if they did end up playing okay, we'd have been able to save a lot of money and would probably still have Gagne.

But I do like the way our defense looks now assuming Homer buries Walker's awful contract in the minors. If he does keep Walker around to eat up cap space, I'm going to be beyond pissed off, but we'll cross that bridge when we come to it.

FlyerEra2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 07:05 PM
  #48
BobbyClarkeFan16
Registered User
 
BobbyClarkeFan16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: London Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,204
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garbage Goal View Post
Because he's an expensive, over-payed contract and he's been regressing for the last three or four years.
First, blame Tampa Bay for the contract.

Second, Meszaros hasn't regressed for the last three to four years. His first year in Tampa Bay, he hurt his shoulder. His second year, Tocchet admittedly used Meszaros in a role that he shouldn't have used him in. Meszaros was used as a shut down defender when he shouldn't have been. The thing was, he was the best defensemen of the bunch in Tampa Bay and Tocchet had no choice. He couldn't throw Hedman or Ohlund into that role and the guy he wanted to play the shut down role (Ranger), left the team. That left Tocchet in a bind and he was relegated to using Meszaros. If you want to liken it to anything, liken it to when Hitch used Nedved as his shut down center.

This is a 24 year old defenseman who has three seasons of scoring 30+ points in the league. Last season, Meszaros lead his team in blocked shots and was third in hits. Imagine him playing with Pronger. That's just going to be a nasty two some to play against. I'll say it right now - with this lineup and with how Meszaros is going to be used, there's no reason to believe he can't put up 45 to 50 points with this lineup. He's got one hell of a cannon from the point and you can bet that he's going to be asked to use that point shot regularly.

BobbyClarkeFan16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 07:16 PM
  #49
Death Taxes Conacher
Nichushkin please
 
Death Taxes Conacher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: St.Pete, Florida
Country: United States
Posts: 27,240
vCash: 123
Send a message via MSN to Death Taxes Conacher
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyClarkeFan16 View Post
First, blame Tampa Bay for the contract.

Second, Meszaros hasn't regressed for the last three to four years. His first year in Tampa Bay, he hurt his shoulder. His second year, Tocchet admittedly used Meszaros in a role that he shouldn't have used him in. Meszaros was used as a shut down defender when he shouldn't have been. The thing was, he was the best defensemen of the bunch in Tampa Bay and Tocchet had no choice. He couldn't throw Hedman or Ohlund into that role and the guy he wanted to play the shut down role (Ranger), left the team. That left Tocchet in a bind and he was relegated to using Meszaros. If you want to liken it to anything, liken it to when Hitch used Nedved as his shut down center.

This is a 24 year old defenseman who has three seasons of scoring 30+ points in the league. Last season, Meszaros lead his team in blocked shots and was third in hits. Imagine him playing with Pronger. That's just going to be a nasty two some to play against. I'll say it right now - with this lineup and with how Meszaros is going to be used, there's no reason to believe he can't put up 45 to 50 points with this lineup. He's got one hell of a cannon from the point and you can bet that he's going to be asked to use that point shot regularly.
No offense but Meszaros was hardly our best defenseman. From December on Lundin was the 2nd best player on the roster and Ohlund was consistently better than Meszaros, Hedman also had his moments too. At best I would call Meszaros our 3rd best defenseman. Check the Lightning gdts last year and you will find more negative Mez comments than anybody excluding maybe Tanguay. The shoulder excuse might fly but he injured it 52 games into the season and it's not like he was playing average hockey then.

And I haven't seen his comments but if he wanted to put Ranger who is/was great on offense but horrible in his own end as a shutdown defenseman then Tocchet is a worse HC than I thought.

__________________
"Embrace and savor the moment." -- WF

Last edited by Death Taxes Conacher: 07-22-2010 at 07:22 PM.
Death Taxes Conacher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-22-2010, 07:23 PM
  #50
phillyfanatic
Registered User
 
phillyfanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ottawa, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,628
vCash: 500
I think homer/scouts saw meszaros as one of the best young d-men in the league. They gave up little compared to what Tampa gave to get him. If he returns to Ottawa form with experience, then carlebecomes expendable for vokoun if need be. He coulld be groomedas kimos replacement?

I have to see him play 20 games before I can make a judgement.

phillyfanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.