HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Sj -cbj

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
08-09-2010, 01:01 AM
  #26
JPavs8Clutchy*
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bye
Country: United States
Posts: 4,656
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaotic8 View Post
If we keep sending off prospects at our current rate, we won't have any depth in a couple years.
OK, what about Clowe?

JPavs8Clutchy* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-09-2010, 01:08 AM
  #27
JPavs8Clutchy*
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bye
Country: United States
Posts: 4,656
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinkfloyd View Post
First off, I'm against a Mike Commodore acquisition. The man's no better than Douglas Murray. Not a minute-eater. Not mobile. Not that good at the shutdown role.

Secondly, you'd rather make a lateral move as opposed to one that makes the team better? In reality, moving prospects is based on needs and expectations. There are only a handful of players outside the pro roster that's actually expected to be an impact player for the team in the future. Everyone else is a maybe, could be, or long shot. And how many of those do you really need to have? If a trade is out there that involves acquiring a top four d-man that would fit what we're looking for, I would damn sure pull the trigger if it needed to include a Charlie Coyle and a 1st and the value was right.
You and I are pretty much in agreement about getting Mike Commodore...

JPavs8Clutchy* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-09-2010, 01:10 AM
  #28
Chaotic8
Boarding Major
 
Chaotic8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 2,369
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPavs8Cluthcy View Post
OK, what about Clowe?
What about him? Straight up for Commodore? Hellz no. It would have to be Commodore and a prospect in return. Or better yet, Clowe for a set of prospects.

Chaotic8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-09-2010, 01:11 AM
  #29
WheresJoe
Registered User
 
WheresJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northern Bay Area
Country: United States
Posts: 223
vCash: 500
Jonny stop make x for clowe deals, they're not that great no offense.

Anyways what would it take for the Sharks to get Tyutin?

WheresJoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-09-2010, 01:14 AM
  #30
Timeless Winter
Oceans of Grey
 
Timeless Winter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Country: United States
Posts: 16,064
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Timeless Winter
Quote:
Originally Posted by WheresJoe View Post
Jonny stop make x for clowe deals, they're not that great no offense.

Anyways what would it take for the Sharks to get Tyutin?
Doug Murray and a pick?

Timeless Winter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-09-2010, 01:28 AM
  #31
Doug19
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Country: Aland Islands
Posts: 6,171
vCash: 500
Yeah, you hate Tyutin but you want Murray. That makes a whole lot of sense.

Doug19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-09-2010, 01:29 AM
  #32
JPavs8Clutchy*
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bye
Country: United States
Posts: 4,656
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaotic8 View Post
What about him? Straight up for Commodore? Hellz no. It would have to be Commodore and a prospect in return. Or better yet, Clowe for a set of prospects.
I actually meant Clowe for Tyutin straight up...

JPavs8Clutchy* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-09-2010, 01:30 AM
  #33
JPavs8Clutchy*
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bye
Country: United States
Posts: 4,656
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timeless Winter View Post
Doug Murray and a pick?
I'll do this even if the pick is a 1st.

JPavs8Clutchy* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-09-2010, 01:35 AM
  #34
Chaotic8
Boarding Major
 
Chaotic8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 2,369
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPavs8Cluthcy View Post
OK, what about Clowe?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPavs8Cluthcy View Post
I actually meant Clowe for Tyutin straight up...
If that's what you meant then ****ing say it to bypass this beating around the bush non-sense.

Yes, I'd go through with that deal.

Chaotic8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-09-2010, 01:36 AM
  #35
JPavs8Clutchy*
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bye
Country: United States
Posts: 4,656
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaotic8 View Post
If that's what you meant then ****ing say it to bypass this beating around the bush non-sense.

Yes, I'd go through with that deal.
Sorry

Yeah, I'm curious as to how Jackets fans feel. It doesn't seem like a bad idea to me...

JPavs8Clutchy* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-09-2010, 01:48 AM
  #36
Pinkfloyd
Registered User
 
Pinkfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Roseville
Country: United States
Posts: 34,277
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonny2134 View Post
Not to be rude or anything of the sort, but what would you suggest that the Sharks do to address their soft defense? Since in many posts I've seen you're opposed to trading Clowe and breaking up the top 6. Ideas?
I've repeatedly said that the only thing the Sharks should do to address their piss poor top end blue line depth involves things like McGinn or Mitchell or Murray or Huskins plus prospects/picks to get them.

We just drafted a handful of players and we have all our picks next year plus plenty in the system. Enough of which can be dealt for what the team needs...especially when one of the options is Sheldon Souray, who can be had for any salary in return.

Pinkfloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-09-2010, 02:28 AM
  #37
Arkansas Shark
Underground Bunker
 
Arkansas Shark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Underground Bunker
Country: United States
Posts: 3,383
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WheresJoe View Post
Jonny stop make x for clowe deals, they're not that great no offense.

Anyways what would it take for the Sharks to get Tyutin?
I'm just really worried that all the options for the Sharks to improve the back end are closed.

Arkansas Shark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-09-2010, 05:33 PM
  #38
Viqsi
carrying the flag
 
Viqsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Scary Internet
Country: United States
Posts: 21,117
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Viqsi
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timeless Winter View Post
Doug Murray and a pick?
Hon, you know I love you, but I'm this close to setting you on fire.


Tyutin isn't readily available because he's our only effective two-way guy who can play in the top-4 - Russell isn't quite there yet. Now is also a bad time to trade him, because his value is low since we discovered the hard way last year that he can't carry the top defense pairing by himself, so his value is at a relative low. It'd be more sensible for us to just keep him and play him where he works well.

__________________
Remember - when you're a hockey fan, it's not "reckless driving", it's "good forechecking".
"Viqsi, you are our sweet humanist..." --mt-svk on the CBJ boards

Thanks, Howson, for cleaning up MacLean's toxic waste. Welcome, Kekalainen; let's get good things built!
Viqsi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.