HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

FINAL 2010 Summer Edition Prospect Rankings

View Poll Results: Do you agree with the rankings for Summer 2010?
Yes, there's hardly anything I'd change 16 31.37%
It's good, but I'd have to correct a few errors 27 52.94%
Decent, I have many alterations in mind 7 13.73%
Dislike, how could it be so off? 0 0%
In the voice of the Critic "It Stinks" 1 1.96%
Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
09-02-2010, 11:59 PM
  #1
n8
WAAAAAAA!!!
 
n8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: san francisco
Country: United States
Posts: 7,403
vCash: 500
FINAL 2010 Summer Edition Prospect Rankings

NYR Prospect Ranking

TOP PROSPECTS

1. (+3) Derek Stepan (C) - Drafted in the 2nd Round of the 2008 Draft
2. (+5) Chris Kreider (LW) - Drafted in the 1st Round of the 2009 Draft
3. (+0) Evgeny Grachev (LW) - Drafted in the 3rd Round of the 2008 Draft
4. (+2) Ryan McDonagh (D) - Drafted in the 1st Round by Montreal in the 2007 Draft.
5. (NR) Mats Zuccarello Aasen (LW) - Undrafted, Signed by NYR in 2010.
6. (NR) Dylan Mcilrath (D) - Drafted in the 1st Round in the 2010 Draft
7. (+2) Ethan Werek (C) - Drafted in the 2nd Round in the 2009 Draft
8. (+6) Dale Weise (RW) - Drafted in the 4th Round in the 2008 Draft.
9. (NR) Christian Thomas (RW) - Drafted in the 2nd Round in the 2010 Draft.
10. (+3) Carl Hagelin (LW) - Drafted in the 6th Round in the 2007 Draft

SECOND TIER

11. (-1) Chad Johnson (G) - Drafted by Pittsburgh in the 5th Round of the 2006 Draft
12. (+0) Mike Sauer (D) - Drafted in the 2nd Round of the 2005 Draft.
12. (+7) Pavel Valentenko (D) - Drafted by the Montreal Canadians in the 5th Round of the 2006 Draft.
14. (+1) Ryan Bourque (LW) - Drafted in the 3rd round of the 2009 Draft.
15. (+10) Mikhail Pashnin (D) - Drafted in the 7th round of the 2009 Draft.
16. (+0) Dane Byers (LW) - Drafted in the 2nd round of the 2004 Draft.
17. (+3) Roman Horak (C) - Drafted in the 5th round of the 2009 Draft.
18. (-1) Tomas Kundratek (D) - Drafted in the 3rd round of the 2008 Draft.
19. (NR) Andrew Yogan (C) - Drafted in the 4th Round in the 2010 Draft
20. (+4) Brodie Dupont (LW) - Drafted in the 3rd round of the 2005 Draft.

THIRD TIER

21. (NR) Jesper Fasth (RW) - Drafted in the 6th Round in the 2010 Draft
22. (NR) Jyri Niemi (D) - Drafted in the 3rd Round by Islanders in the 2008 Draft.
23. (+3) Daniel Maggio (D) - Drafted in the 6th round of the 2009 draft
24. (+2) Scott Stajcer (G) - Drafted in the 5th round of the 2009 draft
25. (-7) David Kveton (RW) - Drafted in the 4th round of the 2006 draft
26. (-3) Nigel Williams (D) - Drafted in the 2nd round by Colorado in the 2006 draft
27. (NR) Sam Klassen (D) - Undrafted, Signed by NYR in 2009.
28. (+1) Justin Soryal (LW) - Undrafted, Signed by NYR in 2008.
T 29/30. (NR) Lee Baldwin (D) - Undrafted, Signed by NYR in 2010.
T 29/30. (NR) Randy McNaught (RW) - Drafted in the 7th Round in the 2010 Draft

HONORABLE MENTIONS

31. Cam Talbot
32. Jason Wilson
33. Max Campbell
34. Tysen Dowzak
35. Devin Didiomente*

GRADUATES

Michael Del Zotto
Artem Anisimov
Matt Gilroy

SUBTRACTIONS (from the last season's poll)

Bobby Sanguinetti
Ilkka Heikkinen
Mitch Gaulton
Chris Doyle
Jordan Owens
Miika Wiikman

FOR DISCUSSION

link -> Compare to last years' rankings
  • What changes would you make to the list?
  • What would your own Top 5, 10, 20, 30 rankings look like?
  • Which prospects do you think improved the most since the last poll?
  • Which prospects regressed?
  • In regards to prospects, where do you see our organizational strengths in?
  • Weakness and holes?
  • What weaknesses were addressed in the last 6 months?
  • What weaknesses would you like to see the Rangers address in the future?

Here's a breakdown of the rankings by position (with last year's breakdown in parenthesis)

C: 4 (4)
LW: 8 (9)
RW: 5 (2)
D: 11 (12)
G: 2 (3)

Thanks to all who participated and see you all in 6 months.



*this is a write in as I forgot to include him in the final poll


Last edited by n8: 09-03-2010 at 02:16 PM.
n8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-03-2010, 03:21 AM
  #2
Black Tank
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: a NYer in England
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,170
vCash: 500
Thing I'm most pleased about is that top prospects 1 and 2 from last year's list made it to the NHL and looked damn good. To me that more than makes up for a high ranking bust (at least for NY) like Sanguinetti.

Black Tank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-03-2010, 04:07 AM
  #3
eco's bones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Elmira NY
Country: United States
Posts: 12,450
vCash: 500
It's a good list but I think most people would be making minor adjustments. Usually if any player is within three spots or so of where you'd rank them then you're in the same ballpark and I think this list is very close to that. Later on I might rank how I see them but I don't have the time right now. Going with my top 6. 1. Kreider 2. McDonagh 3. Stepan 4. Grachev 5. McIlrath 6. Zuccarello Aasen.

eco's bones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-03-2010, 07:38 AM
  #4
BrooklynRangersFan
Change is good.
 
BrooklynRangersFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn of course
Country: United States
Posts: 10,199
vCash: 500
Actually, for me this is one of the better ones we've ever done, but as always there are a couple of differences that caused me to still choose option 2. Most notably, I think Stepan is our 3rd best prospect (after Kreider and Grachev) and Weise is WAAAY too high. Other than that, almost no complaints.

BrooklynRangersFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-03-2010, 07:47 AM
  #5
Jumbo*
TARGET: ACQUIRED
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,720
vCash: 500
Probably the worst list (or at least the most differences) for me in a long time. The top 10 are pretty much the same though.

Jumbo* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-03-2010, 08:10 AM
  #6
NYR Sting
Heart and Soul
 
NYR Sting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 9,506
vCash: 500
Not bad, all things considered. Four things stand out to me:

McIlrath way too high, Weise too high, Sauer and Valentenko too low.

NYR Sting is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-03-2010, 08:38 AM
  #7
BrooklynRangersFan
Change is good.
 
BrooklynRangersFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn of course
Country: United States
Posts: 10,199
vCash: 500
Quick edit - shouldn't McNasty be a RW?

BrooklynRangersFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-03-2010, 02:16 PM
  #8
n8
WAAAAAAA!!!
 
n8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: san francisco
Country: United States
Posts: 7,403
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrooklynRangersFan View Post
Quick edit - shouldn't McNasty be a RW?
oops. fixed. thanks.

n8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-03-2010, 02:35 PM
  #9
eco's bones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Elmira NY
Country: United States
Posts: 12,450
vCash: 500
Maybe something like this:

1. Kreider
2. McDonagh (may have the best chance of any prospect to make the team).
3. Stepan
4. Grachev
5. McIlrath (though MZA, Grachev and McIlrath are almost interchangeable for me at this point)
6. Zuccarello Aasen
7. Werek
8. Weise
9. Thomas
10. Valentenko
11. Byers
12. Johnson
13. Pashnin
14. Sauer
15. Hagelin
16. Kundratek
17. Yogan
18. Horak
19. Dupont
20. Bourque (I have some grave doubts about him. His size and his tendency to get his bell rung).
21. Baldwin
22. Niemi
23. Maggio
24. Stajcer
25. Talbot

eco's bones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-03-2010, 06:50 PM
  #10
n8
WAAAAAAA!!!
 
n8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: san francisco
Country: United States
Posts: 7,403
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by eco's bones View Post
20. Bourque (I have some grave doubts about him. His size and his tendency to get his bell rung).
it may just be Q preseason and I don't think he's slated out to be an offensive prospect (2-way?) anyways but he's got 7 points in 3 games already. doesn't mean much but I think he's progressing and developing nicely. I think he could develop into a Tim Kennedy type player who is currently about the same size.

n8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-03-2010, 07:08 PM
  #11
eco's bones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Elmira NY
Country: United States
Posts: 12,450
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by n8 View Post
it may just be Q preseason and I don't think he's slated out to be an offensive prospect (2-way?) anyways but he's got 7 points in 3 games already. doesn't mean much but I think he's progressing and developing nicely. I think he could develop into a Tim Kennedy type player who is currently about the same size.
And I'm wondering if he's even going to make it through another season there. There's no doubt he could be a good player but I don't think he may be able to handle a couple more concussions. Not his fault but the odds seem stacked against him.

eco's bones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-03-2010, 09:29 PM
  #12
nyr2k2
Can't Beat Him
 
nyr2k2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Country: United States
Posts: 23,098
vCash: 500
Awards:
Pretty good.

__________________

It's just pain.
nyr2k2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-03-2010, 10:02 PM
  #13
RESPECT THE SHIELD10
 
RESPECT THE SHIELD10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Haven, CT
Country: United States
Posts: 890
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by n8 View Post
it may just be Q preseason and I don't think he's slated out to be an offensive prospect (2-way?) anyways but he's got 7 points in 3 games already. doesn't mean much but I think he's progressing and developing nicely. I think he could develop into a Tim Kennedy type player who is currently about the same size.
I see him as more of an agitator.

Only thing that really sticks out in my mind on this list is Niemi. I just have a great feeling about this kid. Nothing to back it up, just a hunch that he's going to be very good.

RESPECT THE SHIELD10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-04-2010, 12:42 AM
  #14
n8
WAAAAAAA!!!
 
n8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: san francisco
Country: United States
Posts: 7,403
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RESPECT THE SHIELD10 View Post
I see him as more of an agitator.

Only thing that really sticks out in my mind on this list is Niemi. I just have a great feeling about this kid. Nothing to back it up, just a hunch that he's going to be very good.
Niemi is gonna get a lot of attention for his near 100 mph slap shot that's for sure. I just hope he is able to keep developing his game in the AHL at a strong growth rate.

n8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-04-2010, 01:11 AM
  #15
SomE
Registered User
 
SomE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,787
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by n8 View Post
Niemi is gonna get a lot of attention for his near 100 mph slap shot that's for sure. I just hope he is able to keep developing his game in the AHL at a strong growth rate.
People knock him because his numbers in the juniors have gone down each season. That's where I bring up other tall dmen with booming shots such as Chara and Souray.. at times during their junior careers their offensive numbers where non-existant. Niemi will always have his shot and size. I have a good feeling aswell.

SomE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-04-2010, 03:49 AM
  #16
eco's bones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Elmira NY
Country: United States
Posts: 12,450
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SomE View Post
People knock him because his numbers in the juniors have gone down each season. That's where I bring up other tall dmen with booming shots such as Chara and Souray.. at times during their junior careers their offensive numbers where non-existant. Niemi will always have his shot and size. I have a good feeling aswell.
A booming shot is one thing--accuracy with it in game situations is another. Chara has better size and a mean disposition that Niemi doesn't. He used those things to establish himself and the offensive numbers came later. Niemi's game from what little I know of it reminds me of Alexander Karpotsev who played for the Rangers in the mid 90's and was actually a member of the '94 team. His upside is as a 5-7 but he has some work to do to get there. Rangers must have seen something to make the deal but he's not an automatic to make it. Rangers have seen something in Lee Baldwin and Niemi's teammate Sam Klassen too or they wouldn't have signed them (in Baldwin's case outbid other team's for his services). If just one of these guys does make it it was worth signing them all--as in the case of Girardi. There is a pretty good chance though that none of them makes it.

eco's bones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-04-2010, 09:10 AM
  #17
Fitzy
All Is Well
 
Fitzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,917
vCash: 50
I like it, I think McIlrath and maybe Werek should be ahead of MZA, but its pretty good.

Fitzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-04-2010, 04:54 PM
  #18
Radek27
Registered User
 
Radek27's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 5,149
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Radek27
Why are guys like Dupont, Byers, and Sauer on the list? They are never gonna see the NHL, atleast not with this team. The fact they are still on the list, as hi as they are tells me this prospect list is weak. Not the order we made, but the players on it.

Radek27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-04-2010, 05:37 PM
  #19
Jumbo*
TARGET: ACQUIRED
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,720
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radek27 View Post
Why are guys like Dupont, Byers, and Sauer on the list? They are never gonna see the NHL, atleast not with this team. The fact they are still on the list, as hi as they are tells me this prospect list is weak. Not the order we made, but the players on it.
Neither is 80% of any other teams top 30 list. Doesn't mean they shouldnt be on the list.

Jumbo* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-04-2010, 05:39 PM
  #20
eco's bones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Elmira NY
Country: United States
Posts: 12,450
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radek27 View Post
Why are guys like Dupont, Byers, and Sauer on the list? They are never gonna see the NHL, atleast not with this team. The fact they are still on the list, as hi as they are tells me this prospect list is weak. Not the order we made, but the players on it.
Not everybody develops at the same pace and sometimes the player is ready but the opening isn't there. The Rangers have a habit of filling all possible holes with journeymen NHL'ers. There's is also the X factor. Sauer for instance was close 3 years ago but has been set back by numerous injuries. The same could be said for Valentenko--it's just that he's been in Europe and for most here out of sight. Byers wrecked his knee early in 08-09 and missed almost the entire season which hurt his chances last year.

Anyway prospects by age at start of coming season. Another way to look at them:

18-McIlrath, Thomas.
19-Kreider, Werek, Bourque, Horak, Yogan, Fasth, Maggio, Stajcer.
20-Stepan, Grachev, Kundratek, Niemi, McNaught, Wilson.
21-McDonagh, Pashnin, Klassen, Hobbs.
22-Weise, Hagelin, Kveton, Williams, Baldwin, Campbell, Dowzak, McCue (we missed him too), Didomete, Chappell.
23-Zuccarello Aasen, Sauer, Valentenko, Dupont, Soryal, Talbot.
24-Johnson, Byers.

eco's bones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-04-2010, 05:54 PM
  #21
Radek27
Registered User
 
Radek27's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 5,149
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Radek27
Quote:
Originally Posted by eco's bones View Post
Not everybody develops at the same pace and sometimes the player is ready but the opening isn't there. The Rangers have a habit of filling all possible holes with journeymen NHL'ers. There's is also the X factor. Sauer for instance was close 3 years ago but has been set back by numerous injuries. The same could be said for Valentenko--it's just that he's been in Europe and for most here out of sight. Byers wrecked his knee early in 08-09 and missed almost the entire season which hurt his chances last year.

Anyway prospects by age at start of coming season. Another way to look at them:

18-McIlrath, Thomas.
19-Kreider, Werek, Bourque, Horak, Yogan, Fasth, Maggio, Stajcer.
20-Stepan, Grachev, Kundratek, Niemi, McNaught, Wilson.
21-McDonagh, Pashnin, Klassen, Hobbs.
22-Weise, Hagelin, Kveton, Williams, Baldwin, Campbell, Dowzak, McCue (we missed him too), Didomete, Chappell.
23-Zuccarello Aasen, Sauer, Valentenko, Dupont, Soryal, Talbot.
24-Johnson, Byers.
I'm sorry there hasn't been an opening for a guy like Byers? C'mon unless I really don't understand his game he can bring the same as Brash, Shelley, or Boogie. Has Dupont ever even been considered for a call up? I don't think so.

What i'm getting at here is I feel this list is weaker than the ones we did the last 3-4 years. But now everyone seems to think we have the best group of kids we ever had.

Radek27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-04-2010, 08:01 PM
  #22
eco's bones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Elmira NY
Country: United States
Posts: 12,450
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radek27 View Post
I'm sorry there hasn't been an opening for a guy like Byers? C'mon unless I really don't understand his game he can bring the same as Brash, Shelley, or Boogie. Has Dupont ever even been considered for a call up? I don't think so.

What i'm getting at here is I feel this list is weaker than the ones we did the last 3-4 years. But now everyone seems to think we have the best group of kids we ever had.
Different ways of looking at them I guess. My POV is our top 6 should all play. There's a very good chance that all of Kreider, Stepan and MZA will be top 6 forwards. A pretty good chance that Grachev will as well and McDonagh should make the team this year and be an important player for us a long time. McIlrath needs more developement but a guy with his size and mean streak is going to play. Add them to younger players like Dubinsky, Anisimov, Callahan, Staal and Del Zotto etc. and we're not in bad shape and a few of the others off the list should make it in some capacity as well. IMO if 2-3 prospects make the team and some kind of impact each year you're prospect development is doing fine. The Rangers pretty much are set up to accomplish that.

Our prospect list might not be the best but it's a long long way from the worst.

eco's bones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-04-2010, 11:25 PM
  #23
BlueshirtBlitz
Rich Nash
 
BlueshirtBlitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 18,750
vCash: 500
I think our top 5 alone gives us an awesome prospect pool- Kreider, Stepan, MZA, Grachev and McDonagh are all incredibly solid prospects who have a good chance to make the team and hopefully make an impact. I have REALLY high hopes for Stepan and Kreider especially.

BlueshirtBlitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:22 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.