HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Who do you want as our fourth line center?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
08-10-2010, 10:56 PM
  #51
KingWantsCup
Grinch who stole...
 
KingWantsCup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,636
vCash: 350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garfinkel1 View Post
I like it. I like it alot.
There's no way we don't give this a shot at least once. Oh my God how I'd love to unleash a Prust - Avery - Boogaard line against our Atlantic division rivals.

KingWantsCup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-10-2010, 11:10 PM
  #52
HockeyBurd*
 
HockeyBurd*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,579
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfgaze View Post
Prust - Avery - Boogaard
That would end up being the third line.

HockeyBurd* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-10-2010, 11:13 PM
  #53
BlueLooksGood
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Long Island
Country: United States
Posts: 70
vCash: 500
If we can get an Anisimov type deal with Stepan, that would be interesting. That is of course contingent of him earning a roster spot... and also Boogard not sucking. I'm not a fan of these no-point lines whose only role is to bring some "energy." And I just don't see how the points will come from Drury or Boyle centering that line.

BlueLooksGood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-24-2010, 06:50 PM
  #54
ninetynine*
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Behind you...
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,730
vCash: 500
boyle needs to shrink 6 inches so he's off the team, should be
prust-avery-BOOgaard[scary]

ninetynine* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-24-2010, 07:19 PM
  #55
surf
Wheres the Reggae?
 
surf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: sea bright nj
Country: United States
Posts: 1,546
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninetynine View Post
boyle needs to shrink 6 inches so he's off the team, should be
prust-avery-BOOgaard[scary]

Yes please!

surf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-24-2010, 07:26 PM
  #56
Brooklyn Ranger
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brooklyn, of course
Posts: 8,239
vCash: 500
As long as Boyle keeps up this play--he's aware of the need for consistancy--I think it's his job to lose.

And let's not forget, a 4th line center's job also includes penalty killing--something Boyle is good at.

Brooklyn Ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-24-2010, 09:07 PM
  #57
rangers4ever2007
Registered User
 
rangers4ever2007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,322
vCash: 500
todd white

rangers4ever2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-24-2010, 09:42 PM
  #58
Khris Creider
Registered User
 
Khris Creider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 2,491
vCash: 500
i like the prust avery boogard line

Khris Creider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-24-2010, 09:55 PM
  #59
pzilla3
Registered User
 
pzilla3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 276
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwoz View Post
Drury is 4th line offensive talent.. so any more than 6 min of even str play and he's useless.. save him for the PK and second PP line.
4th liners aren't usually good for 50 points a season. Minus last year and his last season on the Avs that's what Drury has been good for.

pzilla3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-24-2010, 10:06 PM
  #60
BlueshirtBlitz
Rich Nash
 
BlueshirtBlitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 19,309
vCash: 500
If Boyle really has stepped up his game I think he's the ideal 4th line center.

BlueshirtBlitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-24-2010, 10:08 PM
  #61
darko
Registered User
 
darko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Country: Australia
Posts: 35,465
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfgaze View Post
Prust - Avery - Boogaard

Bingo.

darko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-24-2010, 10:58 PM
  #62
Vitto79
Registered User
 
Vitto79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sarnia
Country: Canada
Posts: 17,007
vCash: 500
well if Stepan can produce on the 1st line then Anisimov, Drury and the 4th would be Christiensen. Kennedy and Boyle will get a chance too

I hope somehow they can find a #1 C for Christ , Avery, 2nd rounder, prospect buuuuuut I coubt it

Vitto79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-24-2010, 11:23 PM
  #63
SupersonicMonkey*
DROP THE PUCK
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Country: United States
Posts: 16,230
vCash: 500
Wanted Werek. Didn't happen this year.

Now, if Boyle can continue what he did on Thursday night, i want Boyle there.

Stepan should really be given a legitimate shot at that top line center spot between Gaborik and Frolov. He is a very good fit there. He has top end playmaking skills and vision. He belongs.

Drury centering the 3rd line between Prospal and Cally.

Anisimov centering the second line between Dubinsky and Grachev or Zuccarello.


Frolov. Stepan. Gaborik
Dubinsky. Anisimov. Grachev/Zuccarello
Prospal. Drury. Callahan
Avery. Boyle. Prust

ex: Boogaard, Kennedy

Staal. Girardi
Del Zotto. Rozsival
McDonagh. Sauer

ex: Semenov

Lundqvist
Biron

SupersonicMonkey* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-24-2010, 11:39 PM
  #64
Wraparounds
Powerful Wizard
 
Wraparounds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 8,388
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SupersonicMonkey View Post
Wanted Werek. Didn't happen this year.

Now, if Boyle can continue what he did on Thursday night, i want Boyle there.

Stepan should really be given a legitimate shot at that top line center spot between Gaborik and Frolov. He is a very good fit there. He has top end playmaking skills and vision. He belongs.

Drury centering the 3rd line between Prospal and Cally.

Anisimov centering the second line between Dubinsky and Grachev or Zuccarello.


Frolov. Stepan. Gaborik
Dubinsky. Anisimov. Grachev/Zuccarello
Prospal. Drury. Callahan
Avery. Boyle. Prust

ex: Boogaard, Kennedy

Staal. Girardi
Del Zotto. Rozsival
McDonagh. Sauer

ex: Semenov

Lundqvist
Biron
Where did Gilroy go?

Wraparounds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-24-2010, 11:49 PM
  #65
Leetch3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,424
vCash: 500
agree with those that say EC isn't an ideal 4th line center, but any thoughts on this idea...

possibly the biggest argument against stepan centering the top line is that it will be way too much ice time for him in his first full season and he'll be burned out by game 40. now what if you dressed christensen as the 4th line center to take shifts with gaborik and frolov more so then between prust and boogaard?

so gaborik and frolov play 20-22 minutes a game but you keep stepan at 15-16 minutes a game by letting EC take random shifts with them to make up the difference.

definitely not a traditional move but would that be a way to let stepan center the top line while also protecting him? especially if the 4th line isn't going to see more then a few minutes anyway.

Leetch3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-25-2010, 12:59 AM
  #66
darko
Registered User
 
darko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Country: Australia
Posts: 35,465
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vitto79 View Post
well if Stepan can produce on the 1st line then Anisimov, Drury and the 4th would be Christiensen. Kennedy and Boyle will get a chance too

I hope somehow they can find a #1 C for Christ , Avery, 2nd rounder, prospect buuuuuut I coubt it

That group will not land you a #1C. EC in waiver wire material, Avery doesnt have much value and a 2nd rounder is 'meh'. That prospect would have to be 1 of Stepan/Grachev/Kreider. What's with people packaging our scrubs for #1 centers?

darko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-25-2010, 01:14 AM
  #67
Canjo
AVA
 
Canjo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ccc of America
Country: United States
Posts: 760
vCash: 500
i really want to see kennedy make the team as the fourth center between boogaard and prust

Canjo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-25-2010, 02:15 AM
  #68
XLJ
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 1,372
vCash: 500
I think Kennedy will push for Christensen spot. Especially if Stepan is centering Gaborik's line. Christensen showed last year that he was ineffective without Gaborik. He didnt look good in the first preseason game. He is going to have to play much better and be more consistent if he doesn't want to end up in the press box. Kennedy is a Torts type player.

XLJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-25-2010, 08:11 AM
  #69
azrok22
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,454
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vitto79 View Post
well if Stepan can produce on the 1st line then Anisimov, Drury and the 4th would be Christiensen. Kennedy and Boyle will get a chance too

I hope somehow they can find a #1 C for Christ , Avery, 2nd rounder, prospect buuuuuut I coubt it
That package isn't going to land you a good third line center; the idea of it returning a 1st line center is both embarrassing and laughable at the same time.

azrok22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-25-2010, 08:21 AM
  #70
jniklast
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Country: Germany
Posts: 5,051
vCash: 500
I'm hoping for Kennedy. While Boyle was good in the last game, I still have doubts he will bring such intensity in most games. He just doesn't use his size enough. Indeed I think even if he was 3 inch smaller he wouldn't be much worse. But on the other hand his size is probably the only reason he isn't in the AHL anyway...

jniklast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-25-2010, 08:35 AM
  #71
DutchShamrock
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 5,075
vCash: 500
Drury... and lots of minutes on special teams. Set up in front of the goalie on pp and get out there every other shift on the pk.

It's Stepan as the #1, EC#2, Anisimov #3. If Stepan is too green, switch him with EC. If Stepan needs time in Hartford, slide Prospal back to center... god knows we need to lighten up on left wing anyway. If EC and Stepan aren't options, move Drury back up the depth charts and go with Boyle on the 4th.

DutchShamrock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-25-2010, 08:38 AM
  #72
Garv23
Registered User
 
Garv23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rockland, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 967
vCash: 500
If Boyle can consistently play like he did the other night, I'm happy with him there.

Garv23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-25-2010, 09:22 AM
  #73
SupersonicMonkey*
DROP THE PUCK
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Country: United States
Posts: 16,230
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYR Fan in PGH View Post
Where did Gilroy go?
I'm as big a fan as any of Gilroy.

But even I can admit when his job is lost.

Sauer is on another level defensively and physically. It was never a question. The issue was health. Now if he's past that, he's ideal for us. We need as many solid defensemen as possible. We still may be a low scoring team, playing solid D in our end is paramount.

McDonagh and Sauer could be huge additions for this team.

Redden and Gilroy out, McDonagh and Sauer in (both big, physical, strong, well skating, good passers, solid defensively).

Redden and Gilroy are an adventure every night. McDonagh and Sauer wouldn't be. They might make some rookie errors here and there but they would provide what Redden and Gilroy can't. And unfortunately for Redden and Gilroy, we need what McDonagh and Sauer can provide.

SupersonicMonkey* is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:40 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.