RDS said that Markov would like to comeback Thursday...hopefully. With Markov in the line up I'd see our pairing like this :
Markov - Gorges
Hamrlik - Spacek
Gill - Subban ... or switch Gorges and Subban
Hammer and Spacek don't make any sense anymore. they're too slow to be together. Every Slower D needs a faster one to complement them. it's only common sense. I would do:
RDS said that Markov would like to comeback Thursday...hopefully. With Markov in the line up I'd see our pairing like this :
Markov - Gorges
Hamrlik - Spacek
Gill - Subban ... or switch Gorges and Subban
Personally, I don't think Gorges and Gill will be separated. They've been complementing each other rather well and make a good pair. I don't see them being split. In the event of a separation, I just don't see how Gill would fair off next to anybody else. So, keeping them intact is the best scenario imo.
I would try to put Markov and Subban on different pairs so we for sure would have two great puck carriers on two duos.
Seeing as Hammer has always been praised in helping out youngsters, I'd put Subban next to him and Spacek with Markov.
I think Spacek could become a very good Dman if his tasks are limited to ''pass it to Markov''.
IMO, those would be the best pairings.
Markov-Spacek
Hammer-Subban
Gill-Gorges
I would be fine with alternating Subban and Spacek, but I'd rather not.
Hammer and Spacek don't make any sense anymore. they're too slow to be together. Every Slower D needs a faster one to complement them. it's only common sense. I would do:
Markov Hammer
Subban-spacek
Gill-Gorges
subban and hammer have already played together, and spacek has more experience on the right side than hammer. and subban plays on the right.
Hammer and Spacek don't make any sense anymore. they're too slow to be together. Every Slower D needs a faster one to complement them. it's only common sense. I would do:
Markov Hammer
Subban-spacek
Gill-Gorges
Markov will not play with Hammer, we can bet on it.
Well, maybe I don't know what I am talking about when I say keeper...someone dropped him today and in order for me to pick him up I have to trade a roster player to grab him, however, if he is going to be out a while I don't want to waste those points....Poolie Rookie!
He will be back in the next two weeks, drop your worst player and pick him it up, its well worth it.
Markov, pinching, then the opponent team attack, spacek one on one ?? nooooooooooooooo plzzzz
Markov - Gorges is the deal!
Thats exactly what i think and i gonna add:
Markov - Spacek : Euhhhhhhhhh markov gonna end with -25 even if it's not his fault.
Markov, pinching, then the opponent team attack, spacek one on one ?? i would say :
Markov, pinching, then the opponent team attack, the forward one on zero (because for me when spacek is alone in the defensive zone it's a breakaway)??
Hammer and Spacek don't make any sense anymore. they're too slow to be together. Every Slower D needs a faster one to complement them. it's only common sense. I would do:
Markov Hammer
Subban-spacek
Gill-Gorges
No way, Hammer and Spacek makes the only sense.
You pair Markov with PK and they each eat up 20-25 mins a game.
You then have Gill and Gorges eating up around 20 mins each.
Leaving Hammer and Spacek each only having to play 15 mins a game each and that's just what we want them playing.
