HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Brett Sutter (CAR) - Cleared

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
11-18-2010, 12:19 PM
  #26
the word*
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: rearranging atoms
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,960
vCash: 500
I can hear the banjo pickin' from Deliverance.

the word* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 12:19 PM
  #27
SoulAssassin
Registered User
 
SoulAssassin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Guelph, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 681
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MapleLeafs38 View Post
I wouldn't mind Leafs claiming him. I'd rather have Sutter than John ****ing Mitchell.
Id rather have some kid from the Can-Skate program then John ****ing Mitchell.... and Burke gave him $725k... YIKES!!!

SoulAssassin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 12:19 PM
  #28
Anton Skinner
DAT PASS
 
Anton Skinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Afghanistan
Country: United States
Posts: 6,162
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by garnetpalmetto View Post
He has to pass through waivers in order to be assigned to the 'A in the first place. This is only so he can be sent down to play in Charlotte, since, as Boom Boom Anton mentioned, the press box would be getting full otherwise.
umm, yeah exactly. i dont get what people dont understand about this......

if you go back and look, both sides were saying that Brett Sutter was part of the deal from the beginning, late october, early november time frame, before the bar fight, and that the canes actually wanted him here. Canes didnt just take him as a dump and then pawn him off. they are sending him down to the A cause it is already jammed up top.

some people....or apparently quite a few, are ver short sighted in the matter.

Anton Skinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 12:25 PM
  #29
iggyman12
Registered User
 
iggyman12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 457
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niedermayer View Post
So Sutter trades his son, only to have the other team send him through waivers and back to the minors?

Calgary sent him to the minors before they traded him. He was not playing in the NHL since mid October. I really dont understand what is funny. This stuff happens all the time...

iggyman12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 12:41 PM
  #30
garnetpalmetto
HFBoards Sponsor
 
garnetpalmetto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Country: United States
Posts: 2,962
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckWoods View Post
This is true.

I wouldnt want to do it either, but I'd rather waive him myself than make him feel like two teams dont want him by trading him THEN having him waived. Haha

Regardless, this kid has to feeling a little down right about now.

I would have just rather waived him myself than him feel completely unwanted by 2 teams.
If he's going to feel all emo and sit in a corner and cry over a routine trip down to the AHL (something that a player at his skill/talent level can't be unfamiliar with) then perhaps pro sports isn't his calling in life?

Quote:
Originally Posted by the word View Post
I can hear the banjo pickin' from Deliverance.
?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anton Skinner View Post
umm, yeah exactly. i dont get what people dont understand about this......

if you go back and look, both sides were saying that Brett Sutter was part of the deal from the beginning, late october, early november time frame, before the bar fight, and that the canes actually wanted him here. Canes didnt just take him as a dump and then pawn him off. they are sending him down to the A cause it is already jammed up top.

some people....or apparently quite a few, are ver short sighted in the matter.
Finally, another voice of reason, Anton be praised!

garnetpalmetto is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 12:44 PM
  #31
Brock Anton
Beer. Meth. Gleason.
 
Brock Anton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Westerly, RI
Country: United States
Posts: 9,399
vCash: 139
I doubt that anyone claims him with his recent off-ice troubles. But I've been wrong many times before.

Brock Anton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 12:44 PM
  #32
Rob Brown
Riot Specialist
 
Rob Brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,509
vCash: 500
I hope Calgary picks him up. That would be for the lulz.

Rob Brown is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 12:47 PM
  #33
tarheelhockey
Moderator
 
tarheelhockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Triangle
Country: United States
Posts: 23,606
vCash: 500
This is completely expected.

tarheelhockey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 12:54 PM
  #34
Jerry Lundegaard
Sutter for Captain
 
Jerry Lundegaard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,029
vCash: 500
There is no room for the new Sutter on this team right now, he's goin to Charlotte

Nex up, Patrick O'Sullivan

Jerry Lundegaard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 12:56 PM
  #35
saillias
Registered User
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,792
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pld459666 View Post
Pops probably couldn't bear the thought of waiving his own blood.

Better to let someone else do that.

Tough position to be in
Don't know what you're talking about, he's been up and off the main club for 2 seasons, he gets waived and recalled all the time.

lmao and people thought Carolina got the better end of the deal.

saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 01:00 PM
  #36
tarheelhockey
Moderator
 
tarheelhockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Triangle
Country: United States
Posts: 23,606
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
lmao and people thought Carolina got the better end of the deal.
Carolina knew exactly what they were getting. They had just picked up Bodie to replace TK, then they went out and dealt TK with Babchuk for the better defenseman in the deal. Sutter was a throw-in who they apparently liked for some reason.

tarheelhockey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 01:06 PM
  #37
saillias
Registered User
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,792
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tarheelhockey View Post
Carolina knew exactly what they were getting. They had just picked up Bodie to replace TK, then they went out and dealt TK with Babchuk for the better defenseman in the deal. Sutter was a throw-in who they apparently liked for some reason.
Oh I know you guys knew what you were getting, it's the fans of other teams coming into these threads saying "Carolina wins(!)," when both teams were just doing a lateral shakeup on defense.

saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 01:11 PM
  #38
Jerry Lundegaard
Sutter for Captain
 
Jerry Lundegaard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,029
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
Oh I know you guys knew what you were getting, it's the fans of other teams coming into these threads saying "Carolina wins(!)," when both teams were just doing a lateral shakeup on defense.
yeah, that pretty much sums it up, nothing to see here.

Jerry Lundegaard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 01:29 PM
  #39
Blitz
Registered User
 
Blitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Fergus, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 887
vCash: 500
Would love to see Buffalo claim him for either the big club or Portland. would give them the depth at centre to waive Neidermayer, and either bring up Luke Adam (thereby sending Sutter to the Pirates), or let Brett centre the 4th line. Off-ice troubles be damned, would be a definate step in the right direction.

Blitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 01:44 PM
  #40
Crimson Devil*
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: In a gutted caribou.
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,131
vCash: 500
Kinda interesting that this happens to Sutter, but when the Devils traded Patrice Cormier right after the **** hit the fan with him... nothing.

Crimson Devil* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 01:47 PM
  #41
bretzky29ca*
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 997
vCash: 500
I'm hearing through the grapevine that the Islanders have just claimed him, re-assigned to Bridgeport.

bretzky29ca* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 01:53 PM
  #42
Rivet52
Sabres & Blackhawks
 
Rivet52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 5,460
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Rivet52
Quote:
Originally Posted by iggyman12 View Post
Calgary sent him to the minors before they traded him. He was not playing in the NHL since mid October. I really dont understand what is funny. This stuff happens all the time...
I don't remember seeing Sutter on waivers at all this season, so how did they just send him down?

I thought I read the Hurricanes were sending him to Charlotte yesterday on their site in the article about the trade. Can someone explain why Sutter had to be waived and couldn't just be assigned to Charlotte after the trade? Is it because he was on Calgary's roster, so he goes directly to Carolina's, thus making them have to waive him to get him down?

Rivet52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 01:55 PM
  #43
Miller91
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 283
vCash: 500
As a Leaf fan, I would happily claim Sutter and turf Mitchell.

Miller91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 01:55 PM
  #44
Anton Skinner
DAT PASS
 
Anton Skinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Afghanistan
Country: United States
Posts: 6,162
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bretzky29ca View Post
I'm hearing through the grapevine that the Islanders have just claimed him, re-assigned to Bridgeport.
now wouldnt that be interesting......i sure hope not. i feel he has something to contribute to the club

Anton Skinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 01:56 PM
  #45
Miller91
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 283
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anton Skinner View Post
now wouldnt that be interesting......i sure hope not. i feel he has something to contribute to the club
If you were to claim a player, you can't send him down to your AHL affiliate without once again placing him on waivers can you?

Miller91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 01:57 PM
  #46
Brock Anton
Beer. Meth. Gleason.
 
Brock Anton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Westerly, RI
Country: United States
Posts: 9,399
vCash: 139
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rivet52 View Post
I don't remember seeing Sutter on waivers at all this season, so how did they just send him down?

I thought I read the Hurricanes were sending him to Charlotte yesterday on their site in the article about the trade. Can someone explain why Sutter had to be waived and couldn't just be assigned to Charlotte after the trade? Is it because he was on Calgary's roster, so he goes directly to Carolina's, thus making them have to waive him to get him down?
He was on a conditioning stint in Abbotsford.

I also wonder about the second part you wrote, I remember one of the articles saying that Brett would still be on the Canes roster, but be on a conditioning stint in Charlotte until they figure out where to put him.?

Brock Anton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 01:59 PM
  #47
garnetpalmetto
HFBoards Sponsor
 
garnetpalmetto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Country: United States
Posts: 2,962
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rivet52 View Post
I don't remember seeing Sutter on waivers at all this season, so how did they just send him down?

I thought I read the Hurricanes were sending him to Charlotte yesterday on their site in the article about the trade. Can someone explain why Sutter had to be waived and couldn't just be assigned to Charlotte after the trade? Is it because he was on Calgary's roster, so he goes directly to Carolina's, thus making them have to waive him to get him down?
The way I understand it, he was in the AHL on a conditioning stint, which means that he was earning his NHL salary and that he could only be in the 'A a maximum of two weeks. Waiving him was done so as to formally assign him to Charlotte and have him earn the AHL salary on his two-way contract.


Last edited by garnetpalmetto: 11-18-2010 at 02:12 PM. Reason: Changed "this" to "waiving" in the last sentence so as to avoid confusion
garnetpalmetto is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 02:00 PM
  #48
tarheelhockey
Moderator
 
tarheelhockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Triangle
Country: United States
Posts: 23,606
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bretzky29ca View Post
I'm hearing through the grapevine that the Islanders have just claimed him, re-assigned to Bridgeport.
It would be hysterical if this were true, and Carolina re-claimed him on waivers and re-waived him to Charlotte

We could watch two teams have a waiver war...


Last edited by tarheelhockey: 11-18-2010 at 02:12 PM.
tarheelhockey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 02:00 PM
  #49
Anton Skinner
DAT PASS
 
Anton Skinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Afghanistan
Country: United States
Posts: 6,162
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miller91 View Post
If you were to claim a player, you can't send him down to your AHL affiliate without once again placing him on waivers can you?
well i am not sure. i imagine that if he was on the big club and you claimed him, he would be assigned to your big club. however, since usually a player on waivers is cause he is being sent to the AHL, he may end up on the AHL roster of whoever is claiming him. I guess it is all a little confusing to me still

Anton Skinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2010, 02:07 PM
  #50
Boom Boom Anton
Registered User
 
Boom Boom Anton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,184
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blitz View Post
Would love to see Buffalo claim him for either the big club or Portland. would give them the depth at centre to waive Neidermayer, and either bring up Luke Adam (thereby sending Sutter to the Pirates), or let Brett centre the 4th line. Off-ice troubles be damned, would be a definate step in the right direction.
But if Buffalo claimed him and wanted to send him to Portland, they would have to put him on waivers also..so not sure this would work like you are suggesting.

Boom Boom Anton is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.