HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > Philadelphia Flyers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Dead line trade NYI Dwayne Roloson to Philly.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
11-19-2010, 08:57 AM
  #26
jb**
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Planet Lovetron
Country: Italy
Posts: 8,556
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by go kim johnsson 514 View Post
The rumor was that Garth Snow wanted a 2nd or 3rd. I'd hedge my bets with Parent plus the 3rd, because he would have been playing for them, and you clear the space to perhaps make another move for another defenseman who Laviolette wouldn't have been scared to death to put on the ice.
I think the big thing about rollie last year was he was still under contract for this year and shooter wisely didnít want his hands tied with that contract. Parent at the time was still I a guy I would have given up on in that deal.

jb** is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 09:00 AM
  #27
Kaktus*
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 22,389
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CannonGoBoom View Post
Yet your so busy defending yourself that you still haven't said what role you would want him in. I said he would play 3-4 games, you tried mocking that, and still haven't given a reason. Get off your high horse, when you start a thread saying you want to trade young guys for an old goalie you can expect that not everyone will agree.
I've asked for opinions, not my fault you can't ****ig read.

Kaktus* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 09:07 AM
  #28
IrishSniper87
Registered User
 
IrishSniper87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Media, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 13,402
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaktus View Post
Not because of last nightís game.

What do you think NYI would want from Flyers for this guy at the dead line? Picks, prospects (what prospects), players like Carcillo, Nodl, Wellwood? D-men like Carle?

How much do you think Roloson is worth at the dead line? If you think he is not our guy just name another goalie you want Flyers to target at the dead line.


http://espn.go.com/nhl/players/profile?playerId=796
Dude ...

Seriously ..... ?

Roloson?

DO NOT WANT! This entire thread makes zero sense. If anything, one of Boucher or Leighton is OBVIOUSLY the go to goalie if Bob can't perform. My opinion is that the Flyers shouldn't give ANYTHING for a goalie about to retire. We have goalies who are average at best, just like your boy Rolo. No need to waste more assets on something we don't need.

IrishSniper87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 09:09 AM
  #29
GKJ
Global Moderator
Entertainment
 
GKJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Do not trade plz
Country: United States
Posts: 111,102
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NWO View Post
I think the big thing about rollie last year was he was still under contract for this year and shooter wisely didnít want his hands tied with that contract. Parent at the time was still I a guy I would have given up on in that deal.
Well, you lose Leighton since he wouldn't have come back, so that's $1M that you have if you figure what we gave up Leighton. I'd rather have Roloson at $2.5 for this year than Leighton next year at all.

GKJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 09:10 AM
  #30
CantSeeColors
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Country: Seychelles
Posts: 5,472
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaktus View Post
I've asked for opinions, not my fault you can't ****ig read.
He gave you an opinion and you told him it was wrong. Sounds like your fault to me.

CantSeeColors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 09:11 AM
  #31
Juicy Couturier*
CannonGoBoom
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philly Area
Posts: 4,910
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Juicy Couturier*
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaktus View Post
I've asked for opinions, not my fault you can't ****ig read.
And i gave my opinion that this would be a retarded move. Lol don't have a heart attack bud.

Juicy Couturier* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 09:13 AM
  #32
jb**
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Planet Lovetron
Country: Italy
Posts: 8,556
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by go kim johnsson 514 View Post
Well, you lose Leighton since he wouldn't have come back, so that's $1M that you have if you figure what we gave up Leighton. I'd rather have Roloson at $2.5 for this year than Leighton next year at all.
Rather have him as well. I think shooter though wanted to address the goaltending in the off season and figured rollosonís salary would be a hindrance. I am probably giving shooter to much credit though as he doesnít think ahead. Still cant believe he gave Leighton 1.5mm. that still cracks me up.

jb** is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 09:15 AM
  #33
Cartsiephan*
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,488
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hextall89 View Post
Prorated at the deadline
It still ends up being @$800,000 on a team who is basically already over the cap. So for exaxmple, it would have to be both Nodl and Carcillo going the other way, in which case he can rot on the island.

Cartsiephan* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 09:17 AM
  #34
rban*
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,894
vCash: 500
[QUOTE=go kim johnsson 514;29044065]Could have had him for Parent and a 3rd last year, and we could have a Cup[/QUOTE

Hard to say. Leighton cr((pped the bed near the end with Chicago, but played well in previous series.

rban* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 09:19 AM
  #35
jb**
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Planet Lovetron
Country: Italy
Posts: 8,556
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cartsiephan View Post
It still ends up being @$800,000 on a team who is basically already over the cap. So for exaxmple, it would have to be both Nodl and Carcillo going the other way, in which case he can rot on the island.
Well once lappy is put on the long term injured list and walker is waived to the minors for the year (or also put on long term injured) it will open up plenty of $ for shooter to go crazy. Also I think Leighton ends up there as well.

jb** is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 09:21 AM
  #36
HoverCarle*
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 17,859
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to HoverCarle*
I would trade Leighton and Walker for him

HoverCarle* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 09:34 AM
  #37
jb**
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Planet Lovetron
Country: Italy
Posts: 8,556
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hovercraft View Post
I would trade Leighton and Walker for him
Why would the isles do it though? You would need to include a good pick or prospect for them to take that package of injured overpaid players.

jb** is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 10:04 AM
  #38
Jester
Registered User
 
Jester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Andrews
Country: Scotland
Posts: 34,075
vCash: 500
We have Bob, Boucher, and Leighton... no reason to get Roloson.

Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 10:05 AM
  #39
Jester
Registered User
 
Jester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Andrews
Country: Scotland
Posts: 34,075
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hovercraft View Post
I would trade Leighton and Walker for him
That would be awesome.

Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 10:11 AM
  #40
jb**
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Planet Lovetron
Country: Italy
Posts: 8,556
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jester View Post
We have Bob, Boucher, and Leighton... no reason to get Roloson.
Only if you think that those 3 are better than roloson and give you a better chance to win..

jb** is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 10:16 AM
  #41
LEIFey
Context Matters!
 
LEIFey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 7,312
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to LEIFey
If we can get Roloson without dealing contributing players, DO IT. If we could somehow trick them to take Walker, I'd be ecstatic. I like Bob and I think he can take us far, but expecting him to do so may be wishful thinking.

LEIFey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 10:19 AM
  #42
Jester
Registered User
 
Jester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Andrews
Country: Scotland
Posts: 34,075
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NWO View Post
Only if you think that those 3 are better than roloson and give you a better chance to win..
Bob is the future in net (as of now) for this organization... if he isn't good enough this year, he isn't good enough. Don't give up resources for a one and done veteran when you have two backups already in the organization.

Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 10:21 AM
  #43
JLHockeyKnight
IMA Real American
 
JLHockeyKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Central Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 19,438
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jester View Post
That would be awesome.
In a mother ****ing heartbeat, I would do that.

No take backs!

JLHockeyKnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 10:23 AM
  #44
Jester
Registered User
 
Jester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Andrews
Country: Scotland
Posts: 34,075
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLHockeyKnight View Post
In a mother ****ing heartbeat, I would do that.

No take backs!
The funny part is that the Isles are such a mess... and so talent depleted, that it isn't necessarily a terrible deal for 'em.

Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 10:25 AM
  #45
jb**
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Planet Lovetron
Country: Italy
Posts: 8,556
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jester View Post
Bob is the future in net (as of now) for this organization... if he isn't good enough this year, he isn't good enough. Don't give up resources for a one and done veteran when you have two backups already in the organization.
If bob falters who would you rather have? Giving up a marginal prospect or late rd pick isnít going to set the organization back. They cant win with leighton or boucher. That is a fact. Roloson is better than both by far imo.

jb** is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 10:27 AM
  #46
Jester
Registered User
 
Jester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Andrews
Country: Scotland
Posts: 34,075
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NWO View Post
If bob falters who would you rather have? Giving up a marginal prospect or late rd pick isnít going to set the organization back. They cant win with leighton or boucher. That is a fact. Roloson is better than both by far imo.
I would prefer Roloson to Leighton/Boucher, but if Bob is healthy, I want him in games.

Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 10:30 AM
  #47
JLHockeyKnight
IMA Real American
 
JLHockeyKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Central Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 19,438
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jester View Post
The funny part is that the Isles are such a mess... and so talent depleted, that it isn't necessarily a terrible deal for 'em.
I actually thought that, haha. Excluding cost/cap hit, they easily win in that deal.

JLHockeyKnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 10:30 AM
  #48
Kaktus*
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 22,389
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jester View Post
I would prefer Roloson to Leighton/Boucher, but if Bob is healthy, I want him in games.
Roloson and Bob in playoffs is not such a bad idea. Especially when Flyers won't have to trade a lot like for players such Bryzgalov, Jean-Sebastien Giguere, Vokoun etc etc Those 3 will require some significant package.

Kaktus* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 10:32 AM
  #49
jb**
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Planet Lovetron
Country: Italy
Posts: 8,556
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jester View Post
I would prefer Roloson to Leighton/Boucher, but if Bob is healthy, I want him in games.
No doubt. Just rather have a better back up who can carry the load for the short term. Well it is going to be interesting to see how the rushkie plays going forward now that he has lost a few in a row. Once he goes around the league a few times will tell a lot imo.

jb** is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-19-2010, 10:33 AM
  #50
Jester
Registered User
 
Jester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Andrews
Country: Scotland
Posts: 34,075
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaktus View Post
Roloson and Bob in playoffs is not such a bad idea. Especially when Flyers won't have to trade a lot like for players like Bryzgalov, Giggie etc etc
I just don't want to give up anything but garbage for Roloson at this point. If they'd take Leighton off of us, that would be great (Roloson expires this year, whereas Leighton is signed through next year); Walker, too.

However, I'm fine with Bob/Leighton splitting time in the regular season (they need to tone down his workload) with Bob getting the nod in the playoffs... even if he's come back down to earth, I would like him to get the experience.

Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.