HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Central Division > Dallas Stars
Notices

Spring Organisational Rrankings; Stars 23rd:

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-31-2005, 08:41 AM
  #1
Ajacied
Remember #9
 
Ajacied's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Netherlands
Country: Netherlands
Posts: 23,128
vCash: 500
Spring Organisational Rrankings; Stars 23rd:

Quote:
23. Dallas Stars

Strengths: Trevor Daley, Shawn Belle and Mark Fistric lead a good crop of Stars defensive prospects. Forward prospects Antti Miettinen, Junior Lessard and Loui Eriksson could make Dallas one of the best two-way teams in the NHL for years to come. Dan Ellis, Mike Smith and Tobias Stephan are quality goaltenders who provide plenty of depth between the pipes.
Weaknesses: Scoring. The Stars lack blue chip prospects, in particular snipers and playmakers. They are also in need of some more size up front.
Top Prospects: Trevor Daley (D), Shawn Belle (D), Loui Eriksson (RW), Antti Miettinen (LW), and Jussi Jokinen (LW).
Comments:

How many teams have a true blup chip prospect up front? I think HF is punishing the Stars too hard for their lack of blue chippers up front and not give enough credit for the hard working, two-way types. The Stars are well filled at most positions except for a top notch center. I don't think that one, pretty big flaw equals the 23rd place. In net we're fine, not stellar, but decent (they also forgot Kipleainen who's had a pretty decent rookie year in NA). Defensively we have 6 defensemen who all have an outstanding shot at cracking the Stars some day (Belle, Daley, Fistric, Grossman, Fransson, Nickerson) as well as a few tweeners (Granath, Jancevski, Waugh).. Much better than average. Whereas up front, Jokinen, Eriksson, Lessard, Polak and Miettinen have top 6 potential (though Miets' style may suit a 3rd line better), complemented by a boat load of hard working types, maybe even 3rd liners (Hagos, Sawada, Crombeen, Holtet, Bararuk, Lammers)..

Ah well, not like we should be higher than 16th, but higher than 23rd would've done more justice none-the-less. I think that for a team lacking a blue chip prospect, you can't do much better than this.

Ajacied is offline  
Old
05-31-2005, 04:31 PM
  #2
12# Peter Bondra
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Country: Slovakia
Posts: 8,688
vCash: 500
I understand that you feal bad about the list but it really doesnt mean much. It doesnt mean that Phaneuf is 9B (or something like that) = he will be a top D-man. He may bust out. On the other had Shawn Belle may turn out to be a no.1, Norris winning D-man.

And Id rather have a team like Dallas, which may not have top notch prospects but is a playoff performer, than Washington, which has Ovechkin, but atleast 2 years before they even contend for the playoffs.

12# Peter Bondra is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.