HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Edmonton Oilers
Notices

Tuesday's practice

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
10-07-2003, 02:34 PM
  #1
Spearing47
Registered User
 
Spearing47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Trois-Rivières
Country: Canada
Posts: 400
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Spearing47
Tuesday's practice

The D pairs were lookin' like this tuesday morning

Smith-Staios
Brewer-Cross
Bergeron-Ferguson

Luoma-Semenov were the fourth pairing.

1st PP unit : Brewer-Bergeron
2 nd Staios-Smith

Spearing47 is offline  
Old
10-07-2003, 02:38 PM
  #2
woody
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 491
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by THEGOON63
The D pairs were lookin' like this tuesday morning

Smith-Staios
Brewer-Cross
Bergeron-Ferguson

Luoma-Semenov were the fourth pairing.

1st PP unit : Brewer-Bergeron
2 nd Staios-Smith
wake-up call to Semenov

woody is offline  
Old
10-07-2003, 02:41 PM
  #3
Spearing47
Registered User
 
Spearing47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Trois-Rivières
Country: Canada
Posts: 400
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Spearing47
Quote:
Originally Posted by woody
wake-up call to Semenov
I think so too....


But I wonder what's gonna happen with the D situation...they're 8 ....they've cut a forward instead of a D....Think they're gonna sign comrie soon.

Spearing47 is offline  
Old
10-07-2003, 02:43 PM
  #4
MrMackey
Registered User
 
MrMackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: cgy
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,061
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by THEGOON63
The D pairs were lookin' like this tuesday morning

Smith-Staios
Brewer-Cross
Bergeron-Ferguson

Luoma-Semenov were the fourth pairing.

1st PP unit : Brewer-Bergeron
2 nd Staios-Smith
Yikes that is weak. Semenov better pull it together before Thursday!

MrMackey is offline  
Old
10-07-2003, 02:45 PM
  #5
Lowetide
Registered User
 
Lowetide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,281
vCash: 500
The great thing about Cross on the 2nd pairing is that he gets to play against the really good players.

Lowetide is offline  
Old
10-07-2003, 02:47 PM
  #6
MrMackey
Registered User
 
MrMackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: cgy
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,061
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowetide
The great thing about Cross on the 2nd pairing is that he gets to play against the really good players.
I hope he gets to play against the other teams' fastest lines... this is when he really excels.

MrMackey is offline  
Old
10-07-2003, 05:14 PM
  #7
oilswell
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wandering the globe
Posts: 1,760
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by THEGOON63
Smith-Staios
Brewer-Cross
Bergeron-Ferguson
Luoma-Semenov
1st PP unit : Brewer-Bergeron
2 nd Staios-Smith
Hilarious. Some fool posted this a month ago:
Quote:
Originally Posted by so this fool says
I think when the D is drawn up, it will be: Brewer+someone#1 and Smith+someone#2. I could easily be wrong, but that's what I'm thinking. If Brewer and Smith can anchor those pairings and the two somethings do fine, the Oilers might be OK.

I could see Cross being paired up with Brewer quite a bit. Cross is big. Brewer is big. That's a big pairing. Cross would play the slow, reliable D role and Brewer would be given a thumbs-up to make outlets and rush up the ice with more regularity. With Niinimaa gone, lets face it, that's what the Oilers need Brewer to be doing. Cross might be a suitable partner for this purpose, although of course Smith might be alright too if he didn't occasionally think he was Bobby Orr and go steaming up the ice too. From what I've seen, Brewer really can bring the puck up to centre and beyond and he's really a fast defenseman (seriously, I think so) and can make up a lot of ground that Cross loses. Of course top opposition will walk around Cross sometimes, but the Oilers will be living in an imperfect world.

One note about Brewer with Semenov: we know this could work OK, but who are you going to pair Cross with? Ferguson? That would be so deadly slow you might as well give up a goal immediately.
Ouch, though. Semenov on the 4th pairing?

oilswell is offline  
Old
10-07-2003, 05:22 PM
  #8
thome_26
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,853
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to thome_26
Quote:
Originally Posted by THEGOON63
The D pairs were lookin' like this tuesday morning

Smith-Staios
Brewer-Cross
Bergeron-Ferguson

Luoma-Semenov were the fourth pairing.

1st PP unit : Brewer-Bergeron
2 nd Staios-Smith

wow..... seeing that I can't help but think something is in the works... and who's saying that Luoma/Semenov aren't the third pairing and not Bergeron/Ferguson? MacT likes Luoma quite a bit from what I've herd - and you know he isn't crazy about having an unreliable defender that is small...... Oh well... all I can say is that seeing these pairings (which seem off to me) and with Comrie back in town, I can't help but think something is up.

thome_26 is offline  
Old
10-07-2003, 05:23 PM
  #9
Mr Sakich
Registered User
 
Mr Sakich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Motel 35
Posts: 8,022
vCash: 500
i think you will see cross with brewer all year. Eric played his best hockey when paired with cross.

Mr Sakich is offline  
Old
10-07-2003, 05:54 PM
  #10
Spearing47
Registered User
 
Spearing47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Trois-Rivières
Country: Canada
Posts: 400
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Spearing47
Quote:
Originally Posted by thome_26
wow..... seeing that I can't help but think something is in the works... and who's saying that Luoma/Semenov aren't the third pairing and not Bergeron/Ferguson? MacT likes Luoma quite a bit from what I've herd - and you know he isn't crazy about having an unreliable defender that is small...... Oh well... all I can say is that seeing these pairings (which seem off to me) and with Comrie back in town, I can't help but think something is up.

Because at practice they had the shirts of the fourth pairing, shirts that guys out of the lineups for the games are wearing.

And Thome_26, I know your high on Luoma but to be objective I re-watched the tape from the game against Calgary and if you think Bergy's defence is bad, then you'll be asking yourself why the Oilers have signed Luoma. He made a lot of mistakes, 3 passes on the wing that became icing, a lot (5) giveaways in the neutral zone. He isn't tough in front of the net and his feet are very slow. MacT hesitates to send this guy down because they've promised him a lot to get him out of his finnish league. That's the only reason why. He brings nothing to the Oilers, he doesn't hit, he's slow and the only time he moves the puck quickly is on D to D plays. Nothing to write to his mother.

the unreliable Bergeron like you've said in your post is not an actual analysis. Maybe last year but not anymore. Bergy played a nearly perfect game against Calgary and his size doesn't matter. He handled Iginla pretty easily all game long especially during a 1 on 1 in the third. I didn't see Luoma being hard on anybody. He's pretty aware of his defensive play and he is learning very quickly. he's very coachable.

ANd ask anybody on the Oilers which guy they fear the most between Luoma and Bergy on a 1 on 1 situation. 100 % will choose berg. He's not satisfied until your in big pain. That's far from being the case for Luoma.

This analysis was based upon what I've seen frome the game tapes. So it's pretty objective.

Spearing47 is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.