HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Vancouver Canucks
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Strange Column Today in the Vancouver Province

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
12-20-2010, 06:19 PM
  #26
vanuck
Griffiths Way Goons
 
vanuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Country: Hong Kong
Posts: 10,733
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Momesso View Post
The Canucks haven't been playing lights-out hockey, but it doesn't really concern me a great deal.

As long as they are winning, things are fine with me.

I understand his point that they need to work out the kinks in their game for the playoffs, because those kinks lead to bad habits and when adversity strikes, suddenly even the "A" game isn't good enough.

Detroit's philosophy has always been to bring the "A" game in the regular season, and still try to reach another level in the playoffs. It's obviously worked.

But many teams also successfully do "just enough" in the regular season simply because the regular season isn't important to them, relative to (finally) answering the bell in the playoffs.

Remember 1994 - our regular season was actually crappy in comparison to prior years (though admittedly the Nedved thing was hanging over the team all season).

To sum it up, it's all about the playoffs to me, and it may well be the same for them also.
But that's assuming that the Canucks are good enough to "turn on the switch", so to speak, and bring their game up into high gear. Whether we're actually capable of doing so just like that, I'm just not sure.

vanuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-20-2010, 06:34 PM
  #27
skywarp75
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,071
vCash: 500
Tony is one of the worst writers ever. I have no clue why people read his drivel.

skywarp75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-20-2010, 06:56 PM
  #28
fuzzay
Registered User
 
fuzzay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Burnaby BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 911
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to fuzzay
"Game-playing could bite Canucks

Vancouver is playing with fire by playing win inferior teams; come playoff time, it'd better"

Yeah, I'm not even going to try reading an article that kicks things off like that.

fuzzay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-20-2010, 07:31 PM
  #29
ddawg1950
Registered User
 
ddawg1950's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,985
vCash: 500
After watching Tony G between periods recently I'm convinced he just needs a little sunshine. Vitamen D deficiency can cause a host of symptoms:

http://www.webmd.com/diet/vitamin-d-deficiency

*"Cognitive impairment in older adults."


*- listed as number two in symptoms section.

Now, I may be wrong, but I heard (E4) that Eklund about to report that Tony's been offered a role in the next Twilight movie.

ddawg1950 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-20-2010, 07:42 PM
  #30
Win One Before I Die
Former Booth Fan
 
Win One Before I Die's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,870
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Win One Before I Die
Quote:
Originally Posted by RewBicks View Post
Two consecutive wins away from first in the West. Best goal differential in the West. Not much to complain about... Nothing, in fact.
You can't even complain about Bieksa right now. Everything is going right for Vancouver right now.

Win One Before I Die is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-20-2010, 08:19 PM
  #31
jumptheshark
the burn out
 
jumptheshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: hf retirement home
Country: United Nations
Posts: 56,055
vCash: 50
Gallagher always cracks me up--when I lived in Vancouver i loved the Burke v Gollam battles

seems to me Gally whould write an article that the canucks are lucky about how bad Minny, Calgary and Edmonton are--nucks are only in the playoffs by 3 pts and are even more lucky that they have 3 games on hand on the aves. If the Division was not so bad--nucks would be under a lot more pressure. For the canucks it is all about playing a good game and not getting injured between now and April

jumptheshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-20-2010, 10:11 PM
  #32
CASUAL KEV
Jack Adams™
 
CASUAL KEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sk, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,901
vCash: 500
Sammy just can't buy a goal! damn that was close

CASUAL KEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-20-2010, 10:23 PM
  #33
CASUAL KEV
Jack Adams™
 
CASUAL KEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sk, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,901
vCash: 500
Geez butt end of your own stick in the eye thats scary

CASUAL KEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-20-2010, 10:25 PM
  #34
CASUAL KEV
Jack Adams™
 
CASUAL KEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sk, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,901
vCash: 500
What the hell am I doing I thought this was the GDT

CASUAL KEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-21-2010, 12:41 AM
  #35
ProstheticConscience
Yes or no, Lester?
 
ProstheticConscience's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canuck Nation
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,100
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JuniorNelson View Post
Gallagher never played the game.

This is my primary issue with the print media. They are like scholastics, they never venture out into the world to test thier theories, but that doesn't stop them from formulating a bunch.

At least the TV guys have played the game! When Garrett (sp?) says a goalie whiffed one, you know he knows what he is talking about. Yes.
Well c'mon. How many people on here ever played the game? We can make posts on the internet, and apparently we're all qualified to comment on the Canucks, their coaching, management, ownership, media, etc.

ProstheticConscience is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-21-2010, 12:45 AM
  #36
LickTheEnvelope
6th Overall Blows
 
LickTheEnvelope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 28,228
vCash: 500
So my question is how many of these "WOW WHY AREN'T WE JUST KILLING THESE TEAMS!??! WHAT'S WRONG WITH US?!!" Articles will we see...

We're 11 freaking games above .500 and right on Detroit's heels for the conference lead...

LickTheEnvelope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-21-2010, 12:54 AM
  #37
VanEric
Registered User
 
VanEric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,344
vCash: 500
Maybe Tony knows something we don't and the NHL is going to the college football system where style points count?

VanEric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-21-2010, 12:57 AM
  #38
LickTheEnvelope
6th Overall Blows
 
LickTheEnvelope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 28,228
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by VanEric View Post
Maybe Tony knows something we don't and the NHL is going to the college football system where style points count?
the Canucks aren't "pretty enough" for Vancouver media.

LickTheEnvelope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-21-2010, 01:08 AM
  #39
jumptheshark
the burn out
 
jumptheshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: hf retirement home
Country: United Nations
Posts: 56,055
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by LickTheEnvelope View Post
the Canucks aren't "pretty enough" for Vancouver media.

it was amusing listening to the postgame show on the team--it was like if they had nothing to complain about--they would have no show or something

jumptheshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-21-2010, 01:13 AM
  #40
Bougieman
Registered User
 
Bougieman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,073
vCash: 500
The whole time I was reading this article in the paper, all I could think of was him sitting there at his keyboard, hands against his temple: "Deadline looming. Controversy sells papers. Need to think of something. Hmmm. Nothing. Deadline. Deadline. Auugghh... C'mon Gallagher... you can DO this..."

Bougieman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-21-2010, 01:58 PM
  #41
neksys
Registered User
 
neksys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,399
vCash: 500
I like Gallagher. Not because he's a particularly skilful writer (he's not) or because his analysis is all that insightful (its not) - but because he's always playing the heel.

I dig that.

His job is to get people riled up a bit and generate controversy where there is little or none - and he's good at it. If you hate him, its working.

Every sports media outlet in North America has a Gallagher or two on the payroll, and its because its effective. Whether you agree or disagree with the guy, the reality is that we link to most of his articles on here and spend several pages ripping the guy apart.

From a media marketing perspective, that's a great success.

neksys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-21-2010, 02:49 PM
  #42
JAK
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 908
vCash: 500
I haven't brought or read the province for the past 10 years now, and I don't intend to, ever.

and Tony G is one of the major reason for that.

(If your the editor of Province and your reading this to see if Gallagher's antics are working, their not, fire him)

JAK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-21-2010, 03:03 PM
  #43
The Big Foot
Registered User
 
The Big Foot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country: Bhutan
Posts: 2,598
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pitseleh View Post
Exactly. It's a dumb concept.

There are no easy games in the NHL. Even the worst teams will win 40% of their games and some of those games will be against good teams. You just can't walk over every team every night, and the Canucks have had their fair share of blowouts against poor teams.

The Canucks are 5-0 against bottom five teams, outscoring them 20-9 in the process. They are 9-1-1 against bottom five teams, outscoring them 48-25 in the process. How much more can people actually expect from them? That's almost undefeated while outscoring the opposition by a 2-1 margin.

This type of analysis is founded on the completely unrealistic expectation that teams will play the perfect game night in and night out. It doesn't happen. With parity the way it is now, teams are not going to dominate like the seventies Habs or nineties Red Wings anymore.
Thank you. Great post with all the info we need to see that this "playing-down-to the competition" business has no base. The Canucks are grinding out wins against the crappy teams, and for the most part playing well against the powerful teams. I guess people need to make up something to complain about though.

People have to realize that this particular team is just plain better than most teams by a good margin, and without being flashy or ultra-exciting, they're going to win a ton of 3-1, 4-2 games. At the end of the year don't be surprised if this is the all-around best season ever numbers-wise (meaning goal differential, special teams, personal excellence, etc).

At times I have been as frustrated as anyone with AV, but he really deserves recognition for the job he's done. Beyond Kevin "The Blemish" Bieksa he's handled players well and many core guys have flourished, in both ends of the rink. Not too many coaches you could say that about.

The Big Foot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-21-2010, 03:05 PM
  #44
Reign Nateo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,194
vCash: 500
Canucks have been playing Vigneault's system perfectly. It's stifling, like a wet blanket over the opposition's offence. Not allowing a lot of chances. By playing better, he must mean we need to finish teams off. Which I agree with. If we buried some chances against St. Louis, that game would have been over in the 1st. A team like Detroit will pounce on something like that.

Reign Nateo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-21-2010, 03:23 PM
  #45
Drop the Sopel
Feaster famine
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: calgary
Posts: 16,217
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pitseleh View Post
With parity the way it is now, teams are not going to dominate like the seventies Habs or nineties Red Wings anymore.
This is what I was going to post - Tony, like many others just don't realize how small the gap is between the have's and have not's in a salary cap NHL. Home ice advantage or a couple injuries to key players is enough to make a bottom feeder in the West even money to beat a Detroit or Vancouver. Yet you hear fans talk like games against the Oilers or Blues should be automatic wins - I think a lot of Canuck fans need to check the betting lines a little bit more, or go one step further and start putting money on the 'bad teams' to beat the Canucks once in a while. After all, the Canucks always play down to or lose to poor opposition right? Well, time to put your money where your mouth is and make some money off it - it's nearly foolproof.

The other thing Tony Gallagher and fans overlook is the fact good teams don't necessarily control the flow of the play and dominate puck possession - they just have more talent and execute on the chances they do get. So you can look like you're not outplaying the Blues, Oilers, leafs still but find a way to win the majority of those games - as they usually do...

Drop the Sopel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2015 All Rights Reserved.