HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Central Division > Minnesota Wild
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

NHL 11 Thread

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
12-19-2010, 04:09 PM
  #151
LightningBurrows
ThreatLevelMidnight
 
LightningBurrows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,747
vCash: 500
So how would you guys rate the Minnesota Wild players so far this season.

I am editing overalls and trying to make it realistic as possible.

(EA's ratings suck)

LightningBurrows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-19-2010, 04:32 PM
  #152
GopherState
Repeat Offender...
 
GopherState's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: X Marks The Spot
Posts: 22,854
vCash: 500
Well I wouldn't complain as much about Latendresse and Sheppard having the same rating.

__________________
Blog: First Round Bust: A Cast of Thousands celebrating a rather dodgy track record of Minnesota Wild Drafting.

"Will beats skill when skill doesn't have enough will."
-Doug Woog
1974 1976 1979 2002 2003 2014?
GopherState is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-19-2010, 05:27 PM
  #153
llamapalooza
Hockey State Expat
 
llamapalooza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: San Francisco
Country: United States
Posts: 7,914
vCash: 500
Bouchard and Havlat are maybe a tad low.

llamapalooza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-19-2010, 05:47 PM
  #154
mnwildgophers
Registered User
 
mnwildgophers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: MN
Country: United States
Posts: 4,497
vCash: 500
Here's what I would suggest:
Bouchard - 85
Koivu - 86
Havlat - 86
Backstrom - 85ish
Theodore - 83
Nystrom - 77
Miettinen - 79 (make sure shot acc is low)
Kobasew - 79
Stoner - 77
Falk - 76
Schultz - 83
Burns - 86-87 (Been our best player all year)
Zanon - I think he's rated 80, I'd put him about 78
Zidlicky - 82 (focus on O)
Barker - 79
Madden - 79
Clutterbuck - 82
Sheppard - 75ish

I think I got most of them. If I didn't get to a player, I'd probably leave them the same.

mnwildgophers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-20-2010, 01:31 PM
  #155
LightningBurrows
ThreatLevelMidnight
 
LightningBurrows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,747
vCash: 500
Sweet thanks.

How would you guys rate your prospects potential and overall wise?

Currently I have

1. Granlund 71overall A- offense B defense B athletic
2. Scandella 66 overall and same potential as Granlund
3. Cuma 73 overall B- offense B defense B- athletic
4. Gillies 74 overall C offense B defense B- athletic
5. Bulmer 66 overall B offense B- defense B- athletic


If i am missing any other top prospects please tell me.

Thanks.

LightningBurrows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-20-2010, 01:35 PM
  #156
Jarick
Doing Nothing
 
Jarick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: St Paul, MN
Country: United States
Posts: 25,017
vCash: 500
Kinda wish I hadn't re-bought NHL 09 for 350 points (= $17.50) on Goozex a while back...it's impossible to move it now and it's dropped down to 200 points (= $10) and I'm still 45th in line to sell it.

I sure hope they overhaul the game for NHL 12 so it's something other than what it has been the last three years.

Jarick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-20-2010, 01:45 PM
  #157
mnwildgophers
Registered User
 
mnwildgophers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: MN
Country: United States
Posts: 4,497
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertoIginla View Post
Sweet thanks.

How would you guys rate your prospects potential and overall wise?

Currently I have

1. Granlund 71overall A- offense B defense B athletic
2. Scandella 66 overall and same potential as Granlund
3. Cuma 73 overall B- offense B defense B- athletic
4. Gillies 74 overall C offense B defense B- athletic
5. Bulmer 66 overall B offense B- defense B- athletic


If i am missing any other top prospects please tell me.

Thanks.
Granlund looks okay, I'd say a 72-73 is more accurate.

Scandella is way too low, he should be at least a 75 with lower potential, more B potentials. I'd say 76 with a B potential.

Cuma should be a 69 with B potential across the board.

Gillies looks good.

Bulmer looks alright, don't know enough about him. Maybe up a couple of ratings.

If you're making players, Jason Zucker is a huge guy to have for us. He's been tearing it up as a freshman in college, but I'm not sure how you're handling college prospects.

Also, Erik Haula is another college prospect that could be added to one our best prospects, but that's really about it that's needed for changes.

mnwildgophers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-20-2010, 01:54 PM
  #158
LightningBurrows
ThreatLevelMidnight
 
LightningBurrows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,747
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnwildgophers View Post
Granlund looks okay, I'd say a 72-73 is more accurate.

Scandella is way too low, he should be at least a 75 with lower potential, more B potentials. I'd say 76 with a B potential.

Cuma should be a 69 with B potential across the board.

Gillies looks good.

Bulmer looks alright, don't know enough about him. Maybe up a couple of ratings.

If you're making players, Jason Zucker is a huge guy to have for us. He's been tearing it up as a freshman in college, but I'm not sure how you're handling college prospects.

Also, Erik Haula is another college prospect that could be added to one our best prospects, but that's really about it that's needed for changes.
Thanks for the insight and help.

I am going to create Jason Zucker.

How would you rate his overall and potential?

LightningBurrows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-20-2010, 02:01 PM
  #159
mnwildgophers
Registered User
 
mnwildgophers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: MN
Country: United States
Posts: 4,497
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertoIginla View Post
Thanks for the insight and help.

I am going to create Jason Zucker.

How would you rate his overall and potential?
Zucker is pretty young, so he's a couple of years away for us. I'd probably make him 68-70ish with A- offensive potential and B's potential on other ones. I'd probably do a 69 overall with heavy emphasis on being a good goal scorer. I'd say SNP, A- Offensive potenial, B Def, B Ath.

That seems to be a fair assessment of him. I'd put him in the CHL somewhere though as college prospects aren't in this game and he isn't ready for the AHL.

mnwildgophers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-20-2010, 02:04 PM
  #160
LightningBurrows
ThreatLevelMidnight
 
LightningBurrows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,747
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnwildgophers View Post
Zucker is pretty young, so he's a couple of years away for us. I'd probably make him 68-70ish with A- offensive potential and B's potential on other ones. I'd probably do a 69 overall with heavy emphasis on being a good goal scorer. I'd say SNP, A- Offensive potenial, B Def, B Ath.

That seems to be a fair assessment of him. I'd put him in the CHL somewhere though as college prospects aren't in this game and he isn't ready for the AHL.
Thanks for all your help.

LightningBurrows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-20-2010, 02:10 PM
  #161
mnwildgophers
Registered User
 
mnwildgophers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: MN
Country: United States
Posts: 4,497
vCash: 500
Not a problem, I should think about doing this too, would be fun to go through the re-ratings.

mnwildgophers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-20-2010, 03:18 PM
  #162
GopherState
Repeat Offender...
 
GopherState's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: X Marks The Spot
Posts: 22,854
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnwildgophers View Post
Zucker is pretty young, so he's a couple of years away for us. I'd probably make him 68-70ish with A- offensive potential and B's potential on other ones. I'd probably do a 69 overall with heavy emphasis on being a good goal scorer. I'd say SNP, A- Offensive potenial, B Def, B Ath.

That seems to be a fair assessment of him. I'd put him in the CHL somewhere though as college prospects aren't in this game and he isn't ready for the AHL.
If you do, Seattle owns his rights.

GopherState is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2010, 01:20 AM
  #163
Fel 96
JFC
 
Fel 96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Little Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 56,873
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Fel 96
Hey guys, what's your PSN? mine is Fel-96. Feel free to add me

I just played an OTP game with a Wild fan and I was the captain so I chose the Wild. His player name was Brent Burns

Feels good to play with Wild fans but they are pretty hard to find especially on Internet.

Fel 96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2010, 11:37 AM
  #164
llamapalooza
Hockey State Expat
 
llamapalooza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: San Francisco
Country: United States
Posts: 7,914
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fel 96 View Post
Hey guys, what's your PSN? mine is Fel-96. Feel free to add me

I just played an OTP game with a Wild fan and I was the captain so I chose the Wild. His player name was Brent Burns

Feels good to play with Wild fans but they are pretty hard to find especially on Internet.
Damn, I'm on Live.

llamapalooza is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:52 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.