Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.
Highly Talented LW Prospect to Toronto
01-22-2011, 06:51 PM
#1
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: CANADA
Posts: 4,078
vCash: 500
Highly Talented LW Prospect to Toronto
They must have high talent potential and also be somewhat close to making the NHL
Some people to think about :
Beach
Filatov
Watson
Stoa
Paajarvi
Omark
Shirokov
as well as more.
What would you want for some of your teams LW prospects?
01-22-2011, 07:31 PM
#2
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,146
vCash: 500
Not inclined to trade Paajarvi or Omark to the Leafs unless it`s for Schenn
01-22-2011, 07:32 PM
#3
Global Moderator
Cap'n
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Oshawa
Country:
Posts: 25,605
vCash: 500
It isn't going to be easy to convince any teams to give us a really good LW prospect without Schenn being the return.
01-22-2011, 07:35 PM
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Country:
Posts: 136
vCash: 500
A deal for MPS would have to include schenn.
Omark + for schenn would be nice but I can't see TO fans considering this at all.
01-22-2011, 07:37 PM
#5
Global Moderator
Cap'n
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Oshawa
Country:
Posts: 25,605
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kyungnam
A deal for MPS would have to include schenn.
Omark + for schenn would be nice but I can't see TO fans considering this at all.
Bang on.
I would like Omark, but sure as hell wouldn't consider moving Schenn for him, unless that + was quite substantial. At this point anyways.
01-22-2011, 07:43 PM
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Country:
Posts: 933
vCash: 500
Gunarsson+ for Omark seems fair
01-22-2011, 07:48 PM
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: CANADA
Posts: 4,078
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
RedwingsnCudi13
Gunarsson+ for Omark seems fair
Well I'm just seeing Gunnarsson + Schenn play together tonight, and I don't know anymore.
01-22-2011, 07:48 PM
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Awesometown
Country:
Posts: 759
vCash: 500
I'd be ecstatic to get Aulie and a 5th for Stoa.
01-22-2011, 07:54 PM
#9
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canada
Country:
Posts: 2,050
vCash: 500
I don't see why Toronto adds in a Gunnarson Omark deal.
Last edited by I am Canadian: 01-22-2011 at 08:02 PM .
01-22-2011, 08:02 PM
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: CANADA
Posts: 4,078
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JoDee
I don't see why Toronto adds in a Gunnerson Omark deal.
VIDEO
01-22-2011, 08:05 PM
#11
Keep Calm, Kassi On
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country:
Posts: 9,085
vCash: 500
Canucks would likely look into moving a Raymond + Shirokov package for a tough top 6 guy. I'm not that familiar with the Leafs system though.
01-22-2011, 08:15 PM
#12
Free Citizen
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Vancouver
Country:
Posts: 6,549
vCash: 500
Taylor Hall for Luke Schenn
two prospects that are a bit overhyped, and fill the needs of both teams
01-22-2011, 08:24 PM
#13
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,873
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
God
Taylor Hall for Luke Schenn
two prospects that are a bit overhyped, and fill the needs of both teams
oh no you didnt!
01-22-2011, 08:25 PM
#14
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canada
Country:
Posts: 2,050
vCash: 500
Taylor Hall is the face of Edmonton. And a more valuable player.
01-22-2011, 08:30 PM
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: McKinney/C-Stat, TX
Country:
Posts: 1,936
vCash: 600
Quote:
Originally Posted by
God
Taylor Hall for Luke Schenn
two prospects that are a bit overhyped, and fill the needs of both teams
New level of terrible is what this is.
01-22-2011, 08:32 PM
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto/Halifax
Country:
Posts: 493
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
God
Taylor Hall for Luke Schenn
two prospects that are a bit overhyped, and fill the needs of both teams
i cant believe this would be suggested with any degree of seriousness...
01-22-2011, 08:41 PM
#17
Global Moderator
BRING ON THE PENS
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: mtl/ott/somewhere
Country:
Posts: 27,737
vCash: 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JoDee
I don't see why Toronto adds in a Gunnarson Omark deal.
neither do i.
__________________
01-22-2011, 09:23 PM
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,040
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
God
Taylor Hall for Luke Schenn
two prospects that are a bit overhyped, and fill the needs of both teams
01-22-2011, 09:27 PM
#19
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Feb 2010
Country:
Posts: 6,386
vCash: 50
Gunnarsson for Omark could potentially work for both teams pretty well, though I'm a little hesitant to give up on Omark so quickly -- I think he's going to be something special.
01-22-2011, 09:28 PM
#20
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Feb 2010
Country:
Posts: 6,386
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by
God
Taylor Hall for Luke Schenn
two prospects that are a bit overhyped, and fill the needs of both teams
Hahaha wth?
01-22-2011, 09:28 PM
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 15,451
vCash: 500
Toronto doesn't neccessarily need a highly talented LW prospect, what they really need is a big LWer with top line talent who can play right now. If they were shopping for prospects (they're not), a guy like Beach would obviously be a target. Guys like Omark, Shirokov, Paajarvi would not.
01-22-2011, 09:32 PM
#22
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,094
vCash: 500
As a Pens fan I'd do something around Tangradi and Kulemin.
01-22-2011, 09:32 PM
#23
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: CANADA
Posts: 4,078
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jfried
Toronto doesn't neccessarily need a highly talented LW prospect, what they really need is a big LWer with top line talent who can play right now. If they were shopping for prospects (they're not), a guy like Beach would obviously be a target. Guys like Omark, Shirokov, Paajarvi would not.
I'm just thinking that Toronto doesn't necessarily have the assets to go out and get those type of guys, that's why it would be more beneficial to simply pay for a boom-bust sort of prospect for a lower cost.
01-22-2011, 09:33 PM
#24
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: CANADA
Posts: 4,078
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sideline
As a Pens fan I'd do something around Tangradi and Kulemin.
Not trading Kule, and Tangradi hasn't looked great.
01-22-2011, 09:34 PM
#25
Formerly chrisx101
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Toronto
Country:
Posts: 9,064
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jfried
Toronto doesn't neccessarily need a highly talented LW prospect, what they really need is a big LWer with top line talent who can play right now. If they were shopping for prospects (they're not), a guy like Beach would obviously be a target. Guys like Omark, Shirokov, Paajarvi would not.
Agreed.
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:21 PM .
monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"