HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Jarret Stoll to Chicago

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-24-2011, 03:09 PM
  #1
digdug41982
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 26,474
vCash: 50
Jarret Stoll to Chicago

Has a reasonable contract and would be an outstanding No. 2 C for the Hawks the rest of this year and next year. What would L.A. want in return? Bear in mind, I am assuming they would have an eye toward next year and the future if they decided to deal him.

digdug41982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-24-2011, 03:16 PM
  #2
northernKing
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,844
vCash: 500
Maybe Stalberg? He has looked very good in the games I have seen him play. Watching him play with Chicago's top 6 makes me think he could be very good on Kopitars LW

northernKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-24-2011, 03:18 PM
  #3
digdug41982
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 26,474
vCash: 50
I'd think they'd want a little more than that, maybe a 2nd and Stalberg?

digdug41982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-24-2011, 03:22 PM
  #4
markisonfire
Registered User
 
markisonfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Country: United States
Posts: 3,854
vCash: 500
Stoll + any prospects not named Schenn for Sharp...

markisonfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-24-2011, 03:24 PM
  #5
Boondock
Registered User
 
Boondock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,622
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldsteelonice84 View Post
I'd think they'd want a little more than that, maybe a 2nd and Stalberg?
Stoll's value is far higher to LA then just 2nd line C. He is very good in the face-off circle, he kills penalties, plays the point on the PP. If LA wanted to move Stoll, it would be for an upgrade, not Stalberg (even with the pick). I'm not sure what the Kings biggest needs are, but moving Stoll for lesser talent doesn't make sense for LA.

Boondock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-24-2011, 03:25 PM
  #6
DisgruntledHawkFan
Moderator
 
DisgruntledHawkFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 23,681
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to DisgruntledHawkFan
Would like Stoll in Chicago. Only makes sense if we are moving prospects/picks back though. Stalberg could absolutely be involved.

DisgruntledHawkFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-24-2011, 03:26 PM
  #7
northernKing
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,844
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldsteelonice84 View Post
I'd think they'd want a little more than that, maybe a 2nd and Stalberg?
Ya I agree it would take a little more than just Stalberg but just looking at the Hawks NHL roster he kinda makes the most sense. There was some talk that LA tried to move up in the 2008 draft to get Beach.

Stoll and Simmonds for Stalberg, Beach/Morin and 1st rd pick? As a Kings fan I don't want to see Simmonds traded as i think he has 25-30 goal potential and is a solid two way player. However his name seems to ALWAYS be popping up so maybe he is being offered up?

northernKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-24-2011, 03:27 PM
  #8
digdug41982
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 26,474
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boondock View Post
Stoll's value is far higher to LA then just 2nd line C. He is very good in the face-off circle, he kills penalties, plays the point on the PP. If LA wanted to move Stoll, it would be for an upgrade, not Stalberg (even with the pick). I'm not sure what the Kings biggest needs are, but moving Stoll for lesser talent doesn't make sense for LA.
What about a 1st and a 4th, seems like a very fair return to me and you guys could draft or use that as currency to fill any hole on the roster. Brayden Schenn will replace him soon, so he is expendable.

digdug41982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-24-2011, 03:31 PM
  #9
Blackhawkswincup
Global Moderator
 
Blackhawkswincup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Country: United States
Posts: 111,754
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by nK View Post
Ya I agree it would take a little more than just Stalberg but just looking at the Hawks NHL roster he kinda makes the most sense. There was some talk that LA tried to move up in the 2008 draft to get Beach.

Stoll and Simmonds for Stalberg, Beach/Morin and 1st rd pick? As a Kings fan I don't want to see Simmonds traded as i think he has 25-30 goal potential and is a solid two way player. However his name seems to ALWAYS be popping up so maybe he is being offered up?
^
Simmonds is overated to be honest and as a Hawks fan we have better wingers on roster then him in our top 9

Cap wise it would be difficult to afford Stoll this year for Hawks

Blackhawkswincup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-24-2011, 03:33 PM
  #10
northernKing
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,844
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boondock View Post
Stoll's value is far higher to LA then just 2nd line C. He is very good in the face-off circle, he kills penalties, plays the point on the PP. If LA wanted to move Stoll, it would be for an upgrade, not Stalberg (even with the pick). I'm not sure what the Kings biggest needs are, but moving Stoll for lesser talent doesn't make sense for LA.
Somewhat true but it does free up cap space for next summer if LA needs to outbid for players like Semin and/or Richards. The fact Stoll/Kopitar sometimes play the point is more a coaching thing IMO. Doughty and Johnson should ALWAYS be on the 1st PP unit. Next year maybe Voynov or Hickey picks up minutes or LA uses the cap room to grab a Markov/Kaberle/Jovo type who can play. Mitchell is only signed until the end of 2011-12 and LA will probably be looking to add another top 4dman to go with JJ,DD and Scuderi.

I only see LA moving Stoll for picks or prospcets if they are 8-10 points out of the playoffs at the deadline. Plus Stoll loves LA and chances are he could be interested in returning as an UFA in 2012. Its just good asset management.

northernKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-24-2011, 03:36 PM
  #11
Boondock
Registered User
 
Boondock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,622
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldsteelonice84 View Post
What about a 1st and a 4th, seems like a very fair return to me and you guys could draft or use that as currency to fill any hole on the roster. Brayden Schenn will replace him soon, so he is expendable.
This is a very good offer, and would get Stoll out of LA. 1st carry a lot of value, especially in the cap era (ELC)

Boondock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-24-2011, 03:38 PM
  #12
northernKing
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,844
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackhawkswincup View Post
^
Simmonds is overated to be honest and as a Hawks fan we have better wingers on roster then him in our top 9

Cap wise it would be difficult to afford Stoll this year for Hawks
Simmonds would bring some of the grit to Chicago that they lost by trading Eager, Byfuglien and Ladd IMO. But I do agree about Stoll and the Hawks cap being a little hard to work

northernKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-24-2011, 03:39 PM
  #13
Boondock
Registered User
 
Boondock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,622
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nK View Post
Somewhat true but it does free up cap space for next summer if LA needs to outbid for players like Semin and/or Richards. The fact Stoll/Kopitar sometimes play the point is more a coaching thing IMO. Doughty and Johnson should ALWAYS be on the 1st PP unit. Next year maybe Voynov or Hickey picks up minutes or LA uses the cap room to grab a Markov/Kaberle/Jovo type who can play. Mitchell is only signed until the end of 2011-12 and LA will probably be looking to add another top 4dman to go with JJ,DD and Scuderi.

I only see LA moving Stoll for picks or prospcets if they are 8-10 points out of the playoffs at the deadline. Plus Stoll loves LA and chances are he could be interested in returning as an UFA in 2012. Its just good asset management.
You seem to know LA better then I do so I'll agree with you although Stoll has always played the point even in Edm - minor point, doesn't change anything. I could see Stoll being moved in the offseason to free up cap space, but during the season unless it's an upgrade, it would be unlikely IMO.

Boondock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-24-2011, 06:03 PM
  #14
DisgruntledHawkFan
Moderator
 
DisgruntledHawkFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 23,681
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to DisgruntledHawkFan
Simmonds and Stoll would be great offseason pickups, we just don't have the space for them right now.

DisgruntledHawkFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-24-2011, 06:10 PM
  #15
SFKingshomer
Registered User
 
SFKingshomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sioux Falls
Posts: 5,176
vCash: 500
Stoll won't be traded unless it's for an upgrade. He's worth far more to LA than a borderline bust and a 2nd. Simmonds isn't available unless you have a legit top 6 forward to trade.

SFKingshomer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-24-2011, 06:39 PM
  #16
JagerPuck
Registered User
 
JagerPuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: the 215
Country: United States
Posts: 2,588
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to JagerPuck
Chicago needs an enforcer. Obviously Carcillo and Hartnell were enough to batter them yesterday.

JagerPuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-24-2011, 07:55 PM
  #17
EbonyRaptor
Registered User
 
EbonyRaptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boonies
Country: United States
Posts: 3,063
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JagerPuck View Post
Chicago needs an enforcer. Obviously Carcillo and Hartnell were enough to batter them yesterday.
Obviously you didn't watch the game. Hartnell turtled when Bickell started pummelling him and it looked like Carcillo got his nose busted when he went at it with Dowell.

Oh ... and maybe it's just a coincidence, but Q dressed Scott for the game yesterday and Pronger just didn't seem to be his usual cross-checking self. Hmmm?

EbonyRaptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-24-2011, 08:09 PM
  #18
Jeffrey Lebowski
Luuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
 
Jeffrey Lebowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Side
Country: United States
Posts: 5,183
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JagerPuck View Post
Chicago needs an enforcer. Obviously Carcillo and Hartnell were enough to batter them yesterday.
Meh. We have an enforcer (John Scott) and he played yesterday against the Flyers and didn't fight or really intimidate. The guys who fought and actually played with sandpaper were guys who can also play hockey (Dowell, Bickell, Brouwer). We don't need an enforcer, we need players who will hit and play physical on top of being able to contribute on the ice in other ways.

Jeffrey Lebowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.