HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Atl/van

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-21-2011, 08:12 PM
  #1
canadianmagpie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,646
vCash: 2361
Atl/van

To Atlanta:
Cody Hodgson
Kevin Bieksa
Vancouver 1st 2011

To Vancouver
Zach Bogosian
Antony Stewart

I am a Canuck fan and wouldn't like to trade Hodgson, but if the trade is worth it, I think that we have to have him as available...

Acquisition of Stewart allows Samuelsson to drop to the third line with Torres and Malhotra or Stewart joins Torres and Malhotra on the third line to provide a bit more scoring, Bogosian replaces Bieksa on the blueline....

For Atlanta, they get a chance to sign Bieksa who would work well in Atlanta's top 4, Hodgson who has high potential and would get more of a shot at a top 6 role in Atlanta....

canadianmagpie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2011, 08:12 PM
  #2
LickTheEnvelope
6th Overall Blows
 
LickTheEnvelope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 28,190
vCash: 500
Atlanta laughs and hangs up.

LickTheEnvelope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2011, 08:14 PM
  #3
mstad101
Registered User
 
mstad101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,247
vCash: 500
You misspelled LADD

mstad101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2011, 08:16 PM
  #4
Cogburn
Registered User
 
Cogburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,846
vCash: 500
I'd be game, Atlanta definitely won't be though.

Cogburn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2011, 08:18 PM
  #5
Winroba
Keep Calm, Kassi On
 
Winroba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,459
vCash: 500
We don't need Bogo, if we're getting something from ATL, we'd want Ladd but that's not happening.

Winroba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2011, 08:23 PM
  #6
canadianmagpie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,646
vCash: 2361
Apparently Ladd is nearing a new contract with the Thrashers so I'm looking at possible replacements....

canadianmagpie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2011, 08:24 PM
  #7
headsigh
leave at once!
 
headsigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta
Country: Isle of Man
Posts: 9,868
vCash: 500
not interested

headsigh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2011, 08:28 PM
  #8
SilverRiver89
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Atlanta
Country: United States
Posts: 2,214
vCash: 500
Just curious, but why do Canucks fans want Stewart so badly? This is at least the third thread I've seen on the matter.

SilverRiver89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2011, 08:57 PM
  #9
canadianmagpie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,646
vCash: 2361
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverRiver89 View Post
Just curious, but why do Canucks fans want Stewart so badly? This is at least the third thread I've seen on the matter.
Probably his size and scoring touch.... it's not like we want him badly, when I looked at the Atlanta roster, it was one of the more likely players they would have available.... a RFA they would have to resign, and to me, just looks like he might be left out if Ladd signs a big contract, I would have thought that ownership wants to keep salary costs down...

canadianmagpie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2011, 10:19 PM
  #10
BLAME CANADA*
The Canucks did it
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 5,696
vCash: 500
Why does Vancouver do this?... Bieksa been one of our best D man this year and we want a long playoffs this year. Our weakness is 4th line center which Hodgson could be the answer to, he did look good their and on the 2nd PP unit. I doubt either team does it.

BLAME CANADA* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2011, 10:44 PM
  #11
Vote for Rory
Registered User
 
Vote for Rory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,055
vCash: 500
As said in another thread, if Goligoski gets Neal and Niskanen, Bogosian will get much, much more.

Vote for Rory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2011, 10:50 PM
  #12
kmad
Riot Survivor
 
kmad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 32,515
vCash: 500
Both teams say no.

Atlanta says no because they're overpaying. Vancouver says no because Bieksa is worth more to them than Bogosian and Stewart, for the immediate future (this year+playoffs).

kmad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2011, 10:58 PM
  #13
Cogburn
Registered User
 
Cogburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,846
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bolt Vanderhuge View Post
Both teams say no.

Atlanta says no because they're overpaying. Vancouver says no because Bieksa is worth more to them than Bogosian and Stewart, for the immediate future (this year+playoffs).
I just have to say, I love the comment below your name

Cogburn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2011, 12:01 AM
  #14
HeadLikeAnOrange*
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,125
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScubaaaBob View Post
Why does Vancouver do this?... Bieksa been one of our best D man this year and we want a long playoffs this year. Our weakness is 4th line center which Hodgson could be the answer to, he did look good their and on the 2nd PP unit. I doubt either team does it.
Gillis would absolutely take this deal and run away laughing.

Dealing from a position of strength (center) to get a stud RHD offensive D-man for now & the future.

HeadLikeAnOrange* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2011, 12:21 AM
  #15
BLAME CANADA*
The Canucks did it
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 5,696
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeadLikeAnOrange View Post
Gillis would absolutely take this deal and run away laughing.

Dealing from a position of strength (center) to get a stud RHD offensive D-man for now & the future.
Bogosian hasn't been all that great this year and we want a cup this year so Bieksa is the better player right now and Hodgson should fill in the 4th line center role and center the 2nd PP unit.... Bogosian would be great to have for the future but we need to build the best team for the present. We don't have a weakness on D it's the 4th line thats our weakness. This trade is a win for the Canucks for the future but Bieksa has been huge for us this year and we'll need him for the playoffs.

BLAME CANADA* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2011, 12:24 AM
  #16
crazy Kassian
The North Remembers
 
crazy Kassian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,591
vCash: 500
Gillis takes this deal, because... the value is too good.

However Bieksa is definitely the better defenseman this year. I can't decide (other then Edler), from Bieksa, Ehrhoff and Hamhuis.

crazy Kassian is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.