I'd MUCH rather have AK and I also want him traded. If trade for Dumont we basically get the same story with AK, except we pay more for a guy who is 33 years old. There is no REASON to make that trade. I'd rather stick with AK at that rate, and hope he reaches his potential than take a chance on JP FREAKING DUMONT.
I don't mind, AK for anything fits with AK for JP Dumont and maybe Nashville's 1st also that would be great.
Nashville doesnt have a first. Gave it to Sens for Fisher.
If anything its overpaid player for overpaid player trade (AK46 for Dumont)
Both have shown flashes of brilliance, but this year for both of them is just a bit of a disappointment.