HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Top Defensemen

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-24-2011, 08:39 AM
  #1
tmack224
Registered User
 
tmack224's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,297
vCash: 500
Top Defensemen

Just seeing what Top 4 Defensemen are actually available for trade and what the team would be looking for in return. Instead of people trying to trade for players that arn't "available" name the Defensemen on your team that you think are and what you would be looking for in return.

tmack224 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 08:55 AM
  #2
LEIFey
Context Matters!
 
LEIFey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 7,318
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to LEIFey
Matt Carle could be had. Asking price would probably be a 1st round pick and a prospect.

LEIFey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 09:08 AM
  #3
LickTheEnvelope
6th Overall Blows
 
LickTheEnvelope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 28,054
vCash: 500
Ballard... similar to above, late 1st (or a 2nd and another pick) + prospect (not a top prospect, but decent).

LickTheEnvelope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 09:09 AM
  #4
WreckItRask
Registered User
 
WreckItRask's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Minnesota
Country: United States
Posts: 7,084
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEIFey View Post
Matt Carle could be had. Asking price would probably be a 1st round pick and a prospect.
A 1st and a prospect for one year of Matt Carle? Yikes. I suppose if it's a late 1st and not an elite prospect, but he's a UFA after this year and he looked mediocre in the playoffs this year.

WreckItRask is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 10:00 AM
  #5
LEIFey
Context Matters!
 
LEIFey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 7,318
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to LEIFey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler Sanguine View Post
A 1st and a prospect for one year of Matt Carle? Yikes. I suppose if it's a late 1st and not an elite prospect, but he's a UFA after this year and he looked mediocre in the playoffs this year.
Well, I'm not sure which team he's asking for, but yeah, like I said, it's asking price so I expect it to be lower. I'd expect a 20-30 1st round pick and a solid but not elite prospect.

And I wouldn't be too worried about the playoff performance. Besides Briere and JVR, the whole team was awful this spring.

LEIFey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 10:06 AM
  #6
zeus3007*
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 13,228
vCash: 500
Tom Gilbert could probably be had, but it would need to be in a package deal for a top line center or an upgrade on the blueline I would think. Smid is also possibly available, for the same thing.

zeus3007* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 10:28 AM
  #7
Chalfdiggity3
Registered User
 
Chalfdiggity3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 1,596
vCash: 500
Girardi could be had for a top 6 forward, although im sure the rangers would have to add a little to the deal

Chalfdiggity3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 10:32 AM
  #8
HarryNealesGarden
Big Daddy Ted
 
HarryNealesGarden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: BOS
Country: United States
Posts: 4,244
vCash: 500
Chris Butler and Andrej Sekera from Buffalo are almost definitely available for the right price.

Mike Weber and Marc-Andre Gragnani too, but I wouldn't consider them top-4 yet.

HarryNealesGarden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 10:36 AM
  #9
tmack224
Registered User
 
tmack224's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,297
vCash: 500
I would prolly offer the same for both ballard and carle from the sabres. 1st and Butler. I'm not to keen on giving up a first but Both of those players can play in the top 4 when at their best

tmack224 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 10:45 AM
  #10
Richiebottles
Big Mike !
 
Richiebottles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,827
vCash: 500
A signed Markov could probably be had because of the Emergence of Subban.

Richiebottles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 10:47 AM
  #11
ChiHawk21
Registered User
 
ChiHawk21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,766
vCash: 500
Hjalmarsson for a nice prospect and a 2nd?? Campbell FO FREE


and some might see Campoli as a #4 he is a RFA that might not be signed (Cap Reasons). Could probably take his rights for a pick or prospect.


Last edited by ChiHawk21: 05-24-2011 at 10:54 AM.
ChiHawk21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 10:52 AM
  #12
ChiHawk21
Registered User
 
ChiHawk21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,766
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeus3007 View Post
Tom Gilbert could probably be had, but it would need to be in a package deal for a top line center or an upgrade on the blueline I would think. Smid is also possibly available, for the same thing.

So to get Tom Gilbert or Laddy Smid you must trade your first line center or give back a better defenseman? Doesnt seem like a very good trade for any team, unless the oil is prepared to take some gigantic contracts

ChiHawk21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 12:04 PM
  #13
internetdotcom
11 + 15 + 19 = 666
 
internetdotcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Capital O
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,689
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to internetdotcom Send a message via Yahoo to internetdotcom
Kuba or Gonchar.

Both had a down year this season, but then, so did the entire Sens team. I fully anticipate both to bounce back next year, particularly if they are on a better team and hence have less pressure. Both can QB a PP and move the puck, and put them in front of a goalie that is actually NHL worthy (i.e. not Elliott or Leclaire) and they can be decent defensively as well.

internetdotcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 12:14 PM
  #14
bernmeister
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,441
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chalfdiggity3 View Post
Girardi could be had for a top 6 forward, although im sure the rangers would have to add a little to the deal
Girardi yes, but only for a premium on his value. What NYR gives in return would have to be determined by who is received in trade.

bernmeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 12:15 PM
  #15
zeus3007*
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 13,228
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiHawk21 View Post
So to get Tom Gilbert or Laddy Smid you must trade your first line center or give back a better defenseman? Doesnt seem like a very good trade for any team, unless the oil is prepared to take some gigantic contracts
Package deal. Some people need to learn how to read between the lines. Or just read what's on the page (screen). The question was "what's available" and I answered the question. Either would be available, but not for just anything, simply because the Oil need defensemen themselves.

zeus3007* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 12:25 PM
  #16
WreckItRask
Registered User
 
WreckItRask's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Minnesota
Country: United States
Posts: 7,084
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richiebottles View Post
A signed Markov could probably be had because of the Emergence of Subban.
Are you offering Markov as a sign and trade? Or are you saying that Markov could be had if you want to sign him? He's a UFA coming off a major injury, so I'm not sure many teams are going to be lining up to trade for his pre-July 1st rights.

WreckItRask is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 12:31 PM
  #17
Lonewolfe2015
Registered User
 
Lonewolfe2015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 11,706
vCash: 813
Pretty sure we'll either see Liles sign an extension early or be traded this deadline from the Avs.

Asking price is most definitely going to be based on Elliot's or Barrie's performance during the season and will depend on his Limited NTC and more than a 2nd round pick.

Lonewolfe2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 01:18 PM
  #18
big ape
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 209
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiHawk21 View Post
Hjalmarsson for a nice prospect and a 2nd?? Campbell FO FREE


and some might see Campoli as a #4 he is a RFA that might not be signed (Cap Reasons). Could probably take his rights for a pick or prospect.
For Hjalmarsson to the oilers,would Ryan Martindale and a 3rd get it done.

big ape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 01:23 PM
  #19
big ape
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 209
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiHawk21 View Post
Hjalmarsson for a nice prospect and a 2nd?? Campbell FO FREE


and some might see Campoli as a #4 he is a RFA that might not be signed (Cap Reasons). Could probably take his rights for a pick or prospect.
For Hjalmarsson to the oilers,would Ryan Martindale and a 3rd get it done.

big ape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 01:59 PM
  #20
ComradeChris
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 590
vCash: 500

Keith Ballard


Det 1st
Landon Ferraro

ComradeChris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 02:01 PM
  #21
Trae
Registered User
 
Trae's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,141
vCash: 500
Regehr for at least a 1st + prospect + maybe another later pick, otherwise he's not worth losing, we have better ways of shedding salary and he's a big part of our core.

Rights to Babchuk for a 2011 pick since we won't be able to sign him as Feaster appears, at least publicly, that he has only been interested in signing Glencross, Tanguay, Karlsson, and maybe BMo.

Sarich, only if Regehr isn't traded (IMO we need to keep at least one), for a 2nd + a decent, but not great, prospect. Coming off a very good year.

Trae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 02:04 PM
  #22
WreckItRask
Registered User
 
WreckItRask's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Minnesota
Country: United States
Posts: 7,084
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trae View Post
Regehr for at least a 1st + prospect + maybe another later pick, otherwise he's not worth losing, we have better ways of shedding salary and he's a big part of our core.

Rights to Babchuk for a 2011 pick since we won't be able to sign him as Feaster appears, at least publicly, that he has only been interested in signing Glencross, Tanguay, Karlsson, and maybe BMo.

Sarich, only if Regehr isn't traded (IMO we need to keep at least one), for a 2nd + a decent, but not great, prospect. Coming off a very good year.
Boston will trade you a 2011 19th Round pick for Babchuk's UFA rights.

Sorry, but Babchuk's UFA rights have absolutely zero value. There isn't a draft pick low enough that a team would part with.

WreckItRask is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 02:06 PM
  #23
Chalfdiggity3
Registered User
 
Chalfdiggity3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 1,596
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bernmeister View Post
Girardi yes, but only for a premium on his value. What NYR gives in return would have to be determined by who is received in trade.
I completly agree, in no way shape or form was i offering up Girardi for scraps. Girardi has turned himself into a very good #2-3 defender who is worth a great deal. Which is why i was stating, Girardi and 1 or 2 solid peices for a legit 1st line talent would be fair value.

Chalfdiggity3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 02:17 PM
  #24
SirPaste
Registered User
 
SirPaste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: STL
Posts: 7,275
vCash: 245
Carlo Colaiacovo is available, not sure what we would want though

SirPaste is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2011, 02:27 PM
  #25
Trae
Registered User
 
Trae's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,141
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler Sanguine View Post
Boston will trade you a 2011 19th Round pick for Babchuk's UFA rights.

Sorry, but Babchuk's UFA rights have absolutely zero value. There isn't a draft pick low enough that a team would part with.
Wow, I dropped the ball there, forgot he was a UFA lol.

Trae is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.