HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Carolina - Chicago

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
06-03-2011, 12:28 AM
  #1
Jerry Lundegaard
Sutter for Captain
 
Jerry Lundegaard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,033
vCash: 500
Carolina - Chicago



Zach Boychuk
2011 First Round Pick (12th Overall)




Niklas Hjalmarsson
2011 First Round Pick (18th Overall)


Chicago gets a forward prospect who will be NHL ready, cap relief (assuming they are cap trouble, if not, apologies) and a bump up a few spots in the draft.

Canes get a much needed top 4 dman. Thin UFA pool...Carolina needs to trade in order to get what they need. Derek Joslin won't cut it, lol

Hjalmarsson's value is higher than Boychuk's. Does the switching of picks compensate for that?

-----


I'm trying to think of what Boychuk + Pick can get for Carolina.

Jerry Lundegaard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-03-2011, 12:35 AM
  #2
Jeffrey Lebowski
Luuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
 
Jeffrey Lebowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Side
Country: United States
Posts: 5,183
vCash: 500
Boychuk is an interesting piece, but unfortunately he doesn't help the Hawks right now... which is ultimately what we would be looking for.

Something around Boychuk for Lalonde is more along the lines of what the Hawks would be interested in, I'd imagine.

Jeffrey Lebowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-03-2011, 12:38 AM
  #3
Piffle
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,219
vCash: 500
I would probably do this from the Hawks side, myself. Some nice NHL ready center depth, a little cap relief, and a bit of a move up. I would hate to lose Hjalmarsson, but I think we might have to do something like this...

This assumes Bowman Jr. doesn't pull a rabbit out of his butt and figure out a way to move Campbell.

Piffle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-03-2011, 12:40 AM
  #4
Jerry Lundegaard
Sutter for Captain
 
Jerry Lundegaard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,033
vCash: 500
What are Chicago's needs going into 2011-2012?

Jerry Lundegaard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-03-2011, 12:47 AM
  #5
Piffle
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,219
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Lebowski View Post
Boychuk is an interesting piece, but unfortunately he doesn't help the Hawks right now...
I don't think I agree. I think a young third line center that can fill in if/when Bolland has injury trouble again is exactly what we need. The question is do we ultimately need to move Hjalmarsson. If we do have to move him, I am ok with a trade like this. We don't need offensive D prospects, or wing prospects. We need a center that can play now, maybe a defensive D prospect or two, and maybe one more goalie prospect that won't be ready for a while (which I don't generally think is worth trading for or drafting early).

Piffle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-03-2011, 12:51 AM
  #6
Jerry Lundegaard
Sutter for Captain
 
Jerry Lundegaard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,033
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piffle View Post
I don't think I agree. I think a young third line center that can fill in if/when Bolland has injury trouble again is exactly what we need. The question is do we ultimately need to move Hjalmarsson. If we do have to move him, I am ok with a trade like this. We don't need offensive D prospects, or wing prospects. We need a center that can play now, maybe a defensive D prospect or two, and maybe one more goalie prospect that won't be ready for a while (which I don't generally think is worth trading for or drafting early).


I don't think Boychuk is ready to play a definite role as a center.

If you need a goalie prospect who won't be ready for a while, the canes have Pogge

Jerry Lundegaard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-03-2011, 12:56 AM
  #7
showtime8
Registered User
 
showtime8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,579
vCash: 500
I really like Boychuk's game, but I don't think he's lived up to where he was drafted.

Niklas Hjalmarsson got a bit bigger contract than what Chicago wanted to pay because of the contract match.

Pretty fair deal, but I think Carolina might have to add a late round pick or mid to low range prospect.

showtime8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-03-2011, 12:59 AM
  #8
Jeffrey Lebowski
Luuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
 
Jeffrey Lebowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Side
Country: United States
Posts: 5,183
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piffle View Post
I don't think I agree. I think a young third line center that can fill in if/when Bolland has injury trouble again is exactly what we need. The question is do we ultimately need to move Hjalmarsson. If we do have to move him, I am ok with a trade like this. We don't need offensive D prospects, or wing prospects. We need a center that can play now, maybe a defensive D prospect or two, and maybe one more goalie prospect that won't be ready for a while (which I don't generally think is worth trading for or drafting early).
I do see your point, we definitely need to add down the middle to our prospect pool... but with Kruger being close to being a full-time NHLer, I'm not sure we're in any rush to acquire someone like Boychuk for next year only. I'm assuming by 12-13, if not sooner, Kruger will be fully ready.

What we need now, in my opinion, is a guy with experience for our 3rd line on a one year deal. Someone who can PK, play with a bit of an edge and show Smith and Bickell how to play their role effectively. Meanwhile, Kruger can work on his game in Rockford or on the wing in the NHL.

Ultimately, Boychuk is not really what we're looking for at the expense of Hjalmarsson IMO.

Edit: I'm all for acquiring Boychuk if he's got top 6 center potential, as I'm not too sold on Pirri as of yet... but it would have to be for a pick/prospect or for an asset that would be replaceable for next year.

Jeffrey Lebowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-03-2011, 01:01 AM
  #9
Jerry Lundegaard
Sutter for Captain
 
Jerry Lundegaard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,033
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by showtime8 View Post
I really like Boychuk's game, but I don't think he's lived up to where he was drafted.

Niklas Hjalmarsson got a bit bigger contract than what Chicago wanted to pay because of the contract match.

Pretty fair deal, but I think Carolina might have to add a late round pick or mid to low range prospect.


well we can't add a late round pick b/c we dont have one. as for a mid to low range prospect, how bout justin pogge?

Jerry Lundegaard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-03-2011, 01:09 AM
  #10
Bubba88
Toews = Savior
 
Bubba88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bavaria
Country: Germany
Posts: 24,321
vCash: 500
1. This deal can't happen. Hawks can't trade Hjammer before mid-july.

2. We get the better Pick and a promising Forward, but who plays D for Hjalmarsson? I would want Gleason, you don't want to trade him here instead of Hjammer

Bubba88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-03-2011, 01:14 AM
  #11
Jerry Lundegaard
Sutter for Captain
 
Jerry Lundegaard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,033
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba88 View Post
1. This deal can't happen. Hawks can't trade Hjammer before mid-july.


why?

Jerry Lundegaard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-03-2011, 01:21 AM
  #12
Piffle
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,219
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Weathers View Post
why?
He signed a contract to match an offer sheet last summer. He can't be traded for a year from when he signed it.

Piffle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-03-2011, 03:23 AM
  #13
Blackhawkswincup
Global Moderator
 
Blackhawkswincup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Country: United States
Posts: 106,723
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Weathers View Post
I don't think Boychuk is ready to play a definite role as a center.

If you need a goalie prospect who won't be ready for a while, the canes have Pogge
Sorry Carl ,, Hawks already have a career minor league netminder in our system in Alec Richards. No room for Pogge

Blackhawkswincup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-03-2011, 07:19 AM
  #14
TSA0402
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,229
vCash: 500
I would actually consider this from the Hawks perspective eventually. My ideal situation is Chicago needs to lose some cap on defence and Hjalmarsson is a victim of his contract. Not sure Carolina does this though. Rutherford doesn't seem like the type to go after guys on big contracts.

TSA0402 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-03-2011, 07:26 AM
  #15
Bubba88
Toews = Savior
 
Bubba88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bavaria
Country: Germany
Posts: 24,321
vCash: 500
what are the Canes needs? I think they need a DMen?

Campoli + #18 for #12 ?


I would love to get Gleason, I doubt you will trade him? Something based around Campoli and Brouwer for Gleason?

Bubba88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-03-2011, 08:24 AM
  #16
Jerry Lundegaard
Sutter for Captain
 
Jerry Lundegaard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,033
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba88 View Post
what are the Canes needs? I think they need a DMen?

Campoli + #18 for #12 ?


I would love to get Gleason, I doubt you will trade him? Something based around Campoli and Brouwer for Gleason?


Gleason stays barring an overpayment. He had a tough year, but played injured for much of it I believe. He was given the A and is definitely in the future plans for Carolina. Also, he's pretty much our only Defensive Defenceman.

Jerry Lundegaard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-03-2011, 08:41 AM
  #17
Chicago Made Punk
MVP #BoltUp
 
Chicago Made Punk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bronx, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 15,734
vCash: 500
Campoli, Brouwer, and something minor for Gleason?

I'd do it. Brouwer would look real nice on a line with Sutter.

Chicago Made Punk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-03-2011, 08:48 AM
  #18
Blackhawkswincup
Global Moderator
 
Blackhawkswincup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Country: United States
Posts: 106,723
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anton the Great View Post
Campoli, Brouwer, and something minor for Gleason?

I'd do it. Brouwer would look real nice on a line with Sutter.
I like this but not sure Gleason is what Hawks need

Blackhawkswincup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-03-2011, 12:10 PM
  #19
Bubba88
Toews = Savior
 
Bubba88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bavaria
Country: Germany
Posts: 24,321
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackhawkswincup View Post
I like this but not sure Gleason is what Hawks need
I see it this way... Gleason would make our team better. Better than with Campoli and Brouwer

Bubba88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.