it's eklund, but this is intriguing nonetheless...
I could be wrong here...but I don't believe the Flyers are as in on Richards as is being said... but they are up to something else enormous.
TweetDeck • 7/1/11 5:19 PM
As much as I hate to say it, if I recall Eklund + Philly = somewhat not really but actually maybe slightly a tad itsy bitsy credible... maybe someone else can chip it, but I recall him being actually on the ball/around the ball/in same sports field as the ball with some of Phillys moves over the years.
Probably have a better shot at landing Lecavalier then Stamkos. No? Why would TB get rid of Stamkos, it just doesn't make sense on their part. Can't think of much else that would be available, maybe Iginla if Calagary just goes into total rebuild. Parise would never happen. Don't think Weber would either.