HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Ottawa Senators
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Did Colorado trade for Elliott to tank?

View Poll Results: Did Colorado trade for Elliott to Tank?
Yes 63 67.02%
No 18 19.15%
Not sure 13 13.83%
Voters: 94. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-02-2011, 03:01 AM
  #26
Countdown0
Painfully Honest
 
Countdown0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 783
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SensFanDan View Post
There is no "deserve" or "right" or "wrong" in sports or games.

There are only the game rules and social contracts imposed by your surroundings.
People say things like this a lot, but karma doesn't care about how logical you try to make it sound.

These "sports and games" are a part of life, and so they are subject to the same judgement of appropriate morality from the out side viewership. You can try to rationalize it however you like, but the draft as it is in its present state (the worse you are, the earlier you pick) functions to create parity and fair competition in the league.

When you deliberately tank and try to finish worse than your team is, you are basically spitting on that fair system, as such you deserve to be b***h slapped by karma, because you are trying to eliminate fairness where it is supposed to be present.

On topic: yeah, unless colorado included getting a better spot in the draft as an incentive to trade Anderson for Elliot, then the trade made no sense.

Countdown0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2011, 03:58 AM
  #27
Bilbo Baggins
Registered User
 
Bilbo Baggins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Victoria, B.C.
Country: Canada
Posts: 246
vCash: 500
The Colorado GM knew exactly what he was doing. In getting Elliot, he was ensuring a top pick in the draft. I just hope that it bites them in the a##. It's within the rules, but still stinks.

I would also say that Edmonton was making sure they kept their top pick as well. It seemed every good player on their team got some sort of ingrown toenail down the stretch, which ensured they were out for the season. I guess they have a lot more experience than us at perfecting the "tank".

Bilbo Baggins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2011, 07:19 AM
  #28
Nac Mac Feegle
wee & free
 
Nac Mac Feegle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,556
vCash: 50
Teams that deliberately tank the way Colorado did usually end up having a boatload of screwed up young players by the end of it. You enourage the kids to fail, and when it comes time to win, they simply don't know how.

Nac Mac Feegle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2011, 08:54 AM
  #29
Nabokov20
Karlsson for Chuck
 
Nabokov20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,677
vCash: 1706
Not sure. Hindsight is really 20/20 in this situation. To be honest, it worked out for the Sens just the same. I would've wanted RNH, but Mika and Andy are quite fine in my books.

Nabokov20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2011, 09:04 AM
  #30
John Holmes*
Spuds MacLean™
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,214
vCash: 87
Anderson is worth the difference between picking 2nd and 6th.

Who knows, we may have the best player anyway. It's not like there was a Crosby or Ovechkin in this draft.

John Holmes* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2011, 09:30 AM
  #31
GK
Not Jeeks
 
GK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Peterborough
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,642
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Holmes View Post
Anderson is worth the difference between picking 2nd and 6th.

Who knows, we may have the best player anyway. It's not like there was a Crosby or Ovechkin in this draft.
This, I felt like all the talent was the same.. No one amazing.

GK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2011, 10:36 AM
  #32
SpezDispenser
Registered User
 
SpezDispenser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 14,404
vCash: 500
No, they thought they could get Elliott back to being a goalie with a bright young future.

SpezDispenser is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2011, 03:37 PM
  #33
Micklebot
Registered User
 
Micklebot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,954
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Holmes View Post
Anderson is worth the difference between picking 2nd and 6th.

Who knows, we may have the best player anyway. It's not like there was a Crosby or Ovechkin in this draft.
QFT,

Besides, this revisionist history amuses me. It's not like Anderson was playing great hockey for the Avalanche at the time. Their crappy play had less to do with Elliott sucking and more to do with the team being crappy, mostly due to injuries.

Yeah, Elliott sucked for them, but they could have just played their backup to try to lose games. This conspiracy theory that they picked up Elliott, solely to improve their draft position reeks of people with tinfoil hats hiding in their basements.

Micklebot is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2011, 03:41 PM
  #34
FolignoQuantumLeap
A mad Mup
 
FolignoQuantumLeap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: A Blue Box
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,426
vCash: 500
Some of the moves made recently by Colorado have been insanely idiotic so it wouldn't surprise me if they thought Elliott could win them some games.

FolignoQuantumLeap is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.