HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > Philadelphia Flyers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

The Max Talbot Contract

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-03-2011, 12:48 AM
  #1
CerpinTaxt
Registered User
 
CerpinTaxt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: KY
Posts: 528
vCash: 500
The Max Talbot Contract

Could someone explain to me why locking this guy up for 5 years is such a bad thing? Dude is only 27 and, from what I've been reading on the boards, is a good PK'er, good locker room character, and good pest.

Is it the 1.8 we are paying him for 5 years? Cause I think if he can do all those things well for the next 5 years, and there is nothing to suggest that he wont, I think it was a good signing.

Thoughts?

Edit: Mods can move to the signing thread if they feel necessary.

CerpinTaxt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 12:49 AM
  #2
Philadelphia Ducks
#BringBackBob
 
Philadelphia Ducks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,699
vCash: 500
It's not the cap hit, it's the 5 year contract that's a little unsettling. For a fourth line/PKer 5 years is a long time to commit to somebody.

Philadelphia Ducks is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 12:56 AM
  #3
sa cyred
Yea....the Flyers...
 
sa cyred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Traveling...
Country: Cuba
Posts: 15,713
vCash: 500
A 4th line pker shouldnt be making close to 2 mil a year...

sa cyred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 01:00 AM
  #4
CerpinTaxt
Registered User
 
CerpinTaxt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: KY
Posts: 528
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philadelphia Ducks View Post
It's not the cap hit, it's the 5 year contract that's a little unsettling. For a fourth line/PKer 5 years is a long time to commit to somebody.
but why?

CerpinTaxt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 01:01 AM
  #5
CerpinTaxt
Registered User
 
CerpinTaxt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: KY
Posts: 528
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sa cyred View Post
A 4th line pker shouldnt be making close to 2 mil a year...
I dont here people complaining about the cap hit as much as the length...

CerpinTaxt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 01:02 AM
  #6
Readyrock
(・_・;)
 
Readyrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,708
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sa cyred View Post
A 4th line pker shouldnt be making close to 2 mil a year...
After the July 1st the NHL just had, how can you be put-off by Talbot's bloated deal?

It's a perfect storm of salary cap increase, a stretched talent pool, an unsavory free agent crop and ornery fanbases.

Readyrock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 01:04 AM
  #7
might2mash
Post-apocalyptic
 
might2mash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: South Bend
Country: United States
Posts: 4,616
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to might2mash
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philadelphia Ducks View Post
It's not the cap hit, it's the 5 year contract that's a little unsettling. For a fourth line/PKer 5 years is a long time to commit to somebody.
I feel like he can be more than a plain 4th liner. He's got some of the heart this team would be missing, and will provide leadership in the locker room, and frankly I don't think he was a great fit for the style of play in Pittsburgh. We'll want him around for that term I think. Honestly though, for a deal longer than 3 years though I'd have expected the cap hit to be closer to 1.5 or less.

might2mash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 01:06 AM
  #8
sa cyred
Yea....the Flyers...
 
sa cyred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Traveling...
Country: Cuba
Posts: 15,713
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CerpinTaxt View Post
I dont here people complaining about the cap hit as much as the length...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarfo View Post
After the July 1st the NHL just had, how can you be put-off by Talbot's bloated deal?

It's a perfect storm of salary cap increase, a stretched talent pool, an unsavory free agent crop and ornery fanbases.
Just because everyone else is doing it, doesn't make it right. I like the player, but not cap hit/length. I think he will be a good addition though. I just think 1.8 for 5 years is high... any which way you look at it.

sa cyred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 01:07 AM
  #9
Beef Invictus
Global Moderator
Beef Runner
 
Beef Invictus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Centreville
Country: Lord Howe Island
Posts: 40,774
vCash: 500
Trades exist. I'm not worried about length. If he doesn't work, someone else will probably want him for 3 years at his hit.

__________________
Down in the basement, I've got a Craftsman lathe. Show it to the children when they misbehave.
Beef Invictus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 01:11 AM
  #10
CanadianFlyer88
Moderator
Knublin' PPs
 
CanadianFlyer88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Van City
Posts: 14,713
vCash: 500
I don't mind the contract, as I don't see Talbot as a 4th liner in this group.

I expect to see him as the 3rd line left winger with Schenn & Simmonds. Talbot's a below average centre, but he can be an effective winger; I hope Lavi keeps him on the wing.

In 2-3 years, $1.8M for Talbot won't be so difficult to swallow.

__________________
I deride your truth handling abilities
CanadianFlyer88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 01:14 AM
  #11
sa cyred
Yea....the Flyers...
 
sa cyred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Traveling...
Country: Cuba
Posts: 15,713
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadianFlyer88 View Post
I don't mind the contract, as I don't see Talbot as a 4th liner in this group.

I expect to see him as the 3rd line left winger with Schenn & Simmonds. Talbot's a below average centre, but he can be an effective winger; I hope Lavi keeps him on the wing.

In 2-3 years, $1.8M for Talbot won't be so difficult to swallow.
Eh, personally I hope not. He is good defensively... but thats about it. Has really no offensive instinct at all. Hoping we sign someone for the 3rd line or let someone like Read or Wellwood or whoever battle for it

(well Homer seemed to say last night (well July 1st) that he believes Read and Couturier will fight for a roster spot. I dont think he means as a 4th liner either)

sa cyred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 01:18 AM
  #12
CanadianFlyer88
Moderator
Knublin' PPs
 
CanadianFlyer88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Van City
Posts: 14,713
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sa cyred View Post
Eh, personally I hope not. He is good defensively... but thats about it. Has really no offensive instinct at all. Hoping we sign someone for the 3rd line or let someone like Read or Wellwood or whoever battle for it

(well Homer seemed to say last night (well July 1st) that he believes Read and Couturier will fight for a roster spot. I dont think he means as a 4th liner either)
The Flyers are not going to be an offensively deep team. We're going to see a 'traditional 3rd line'... likely without the strong faceoff aspect.

CanadianFlyer88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 01:19 AM
  #13
Readyrock
(・_・;)
 
Readyrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,708
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sa cyred View Post
Just because everyone else is doing it, doesn't make it right.
I understand, but what are the alternatives?

Stick to our principles regarding free agents and play Rinaldo?

Readyrock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 01:20 AM
  #14
CerpinTaxt
Registered User
 
CerpinTaxt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: KY
Posts: 528
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sa cyred View Post
Just because everyone else is doing it, doesn't make it right. I like the player, but not cap hit/length. I think he will be a good addition though. I just think 1.8 for 5 years is high... any which way you look at it.
Huh?

Anyway, so you dont like the length, cause of the cap hit then. Fair enough I suppose. I think it can be a good signing, if he can do all the things hes touted for, while potting 10 goals, 25 pts.

CerpinTaxt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 01:21 AM
  #15
sa cyred
Yea....the Flyers...
 
sa cyred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Traveling...
Country: Cuba
Posts: 15,713
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarfo View Post
I understand, but what are the alternatives?

Stick to our principles regarding free agents and play Rinaldo?
Quote:
Originally Posted by CerpinTaxt View Post
Huh?

Anyway, so you dont like the length, cause of the cap hit then. Fair enough I suppose. I think it can be a good signing, if he can do all the things hes touted for, while potting 10 goals, 25 pts.
There really are none. Like I said though, I kinda like the player but not the caphit/length. Nothing you can do about it.

sa cyred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 01:24 AM
  #16
CerpinTaxt
Registered User
 
CerpinTaxt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: KY
Posts: 528
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sa cyred View Post
Eh, personally I hope not. He is good defensively... but thats about it. Has really no offensive instinct at all. Hoping we sign someone for the 3rd line or let someone like Read or Wellwood or whoever battle for it

(well Homer seemed to say last night (well July 1st) that he believes Read and Couturier will fight for a roster spot. I dont think he means as a 4th liner either)
He has scored more goals then any of our other 4th line players have, but that could be a little bit of playing with Crosby.

If he can move up and down our lineup like he did in Pittsburgh, no reason to think he cant score at least 10.

CerpinTaxt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 01:25 AM
  #17
sa cyred
Yea....the Flyers...
 
sa cyred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Traveling...
Country: Cuba
Posts: 15,713
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadianFlyer88 View Post
The Flyers are not going to be an offensively deep team. We're going to see a 'traditional 3rd line'... likely without the strong faceoff aspect.
Personally, I would have liked to grab a somewhat defensive minded center (who can put up 30-40 points) to play on the 3rd and put Schenn on the wing. I would have liked Arnott. Doesnt play on the pk, but can play defense somewhat and can win faceoffs.

Personally, I just dont know how much faith I would have in a traditional 3rd line of Talbot-Schenn-Simmonds

sa cyred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 01:29 AM
  #18
sa cyred
Yea....the Flyers...
 
sa cyred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Traveling...
Country: Cuba
Posts: 15,713
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CerpinTaxt View Post
He has scored more goals then any of our other 4th line players have, but that could be a little bit of playing with Crosby.

If he can move up and down our lineup like he did in Pittsburgh, no reason to think he cant score at least 10.
Here is who he played with last season:

Quote:
9.23% EV 18 CONNER,CHRIS - 17 RUPP,MICHAEL - 25 TALBOT,MAXIME
7.93% EV 24 COOKE,MATT - 71 MALKIN,EVGENI - 25 TALBOT,MAXIME
5.93% EV 24 COOKE,MATT - 9 DUPUIS,PASCAL - 25 TALBOT,MAXIME
5.89% EV 24 COOKE,MATT - 48 KENNEDY,TYLER - 25 TALBOT,MAXIME
5.77% EV 16 CONNER,CHRIS - 9 DUPUIS,PASCAL - 25 TALBOT,MAXIME
5.34% EV 27 ADAMS,CRAIG - 17 RUPP,MICHAEL - 25 TALBOT,MAXIME
Gotta remember though, with Crosby/Malkin injured, he saw a huge increase in icetime, which I dont think he would be getting here.

Like I said though. I like Talbot. I just dont see him as a 3rd liner who plays 15 minutes a night on a contending team.... well I guess if we are a contending team.

sa cyred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 01:38 AM
  #19
mikedifr
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 8,359
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sa cyred View Post
Eh, personally I hope not. He is good defensively... but thats about it. Has really no offensive instinct at all. Hoping we sign someone for the 3rd line or let someone like Read or Wellwood or whoever battle for it

(well Homer seemed to say last night (well July 1st) that he believes Read and Couturier will fight for a roster spot. I dont think he means as a 4th liner either)
I dont mind the signing either...but I dont want him on the 3rd line...I want him on the 4th.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sa cyred View Post
Personally, I would have liked to grab a somewhat defensive minded center (who can put up 30-40 points) to play on the 3rd and put Schenn on the wing. I would have liked Arnott. Doesnt play on the pk, but can play defense somewhat and can win faceoffs.

Personally, I just dont know how much faith I would have in a traditional 3rd line of Talbot-Schenn-Simmonds
Please no....I am hoping the 3rd piece of that line is not currently on the roster....I was hoping Nodl would get another shot at the 3rd line, but not if the other 2 are just as young.

I would love Arnott, just move Schenn to wing. When Arnott misses his 20 games per year that he misses, move Schenn over to center.

mikedifr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 01:57 AM
  #20
six sigma
Seahawks/Flyers
 
six sigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,938
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CerpinTaxt View Post
Could someone explain to me why locking this guy up for 5 years is such a bad thing?
I can't, because I'm of the opinion that if the right player is available for your needs you freaking SIGN HIM. Maybe Talbot is exactly what this team needs

If he kills penalties well and helps the rest to play better due to his presence and personality, then I say neither the cap hit or the term bother me at all.

six sigma is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 01:57 AM
  #21
hXc Chris
Registered User
 
hXc Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: West Chester
Posts: 147
vCash: 500
We have 3mil tied up in Shelley and Talbot when guys like Vokoun are signing for 1.5...thats why i'm so bitter.

hXc Chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 02:09 AM
  #22
SolidSnakeUS
Registered User
 
SolidSnakeUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pipersville, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 30,702
vCash: 500
Even if he is a 4th liner, if he a younger, faster version of Lappy, I think we could use a guy like him for that length.

SolidSnakeUS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 02:12 AM
  #23
WeekendAtBernies
Registered User
 
WeekendAtBernies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,716
vCash: 500
Don't really understand why people hate the Talbot signing... do you really think a good PKer and gritty / tough guy like Talbot won't be in demand 2-3 years from now from a team who needs to hit the cap floor?

At absolute worst, he plays here for 2 years and is shipped off for a late round pick and we sign someone new.

At best, the cap keeps going up, Talbot shows a little offense, and he looks like a total steal.

No matter what happens, that looks like a good signing to me...

WeekendAtBernies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-03-2011, 02:12 AM
  #24
Big McLargehuge
Global Moderator
HFBoards: Night's Watch
 
Big McLargehuge's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Country: Iceland
Posts: 55,192
vCash: 500
Penguins fan coming in peace.

He's been playing at about 50% capacity ever since that Stanley Cup. He's never had much offense, so expecting him to be a third liner really doesn't work (hell, we once expected him to be a second liner...that playoff run was just lightning in a bottle and a soul sold to the devil to play through about 6 injuries).

Injury concerns are why Penguins fans didn't want him to be back on an extended contract, leaving any and all financial figures out of it. I doubt Talbot finishes his contract, to be completely honest. I wish nothing but the best for him, and I know that part of the reason he went with the most money is because he may not see another contract after this one. It's hard to blame the guy.

He may be 27, but he aged a good half-dozen years after that Cup run and just hasn't been the same player since.


You guys should be able to ship him off if he doesn't live up to expectations, though. His locker room presence is top notch, and teams will always love that. He's not a guy you look towards for leadership, but a guy you look for to keep the room loose. What he was able to do for Marc-Andre Fleury (his best friend on the team for years) after Game 5 of the 2009 finals can't be understated enough. He's just nothing more than a 12th forward/PK specialist at this point, though.


If you want him to be a Laperierre...he'll come close. Lappy was always a better player than Talbot was, but Talbot is every bit the warrior.

__________________
“The most terrifying fact about the universe is not that it is hostile, but that it is indifferent. If we can come to terms with this indifference and accept the challenges of life within the boundaries of death, our existence as a species can have genuine meaning and fulfillment. However vast the darkness, we must supply our own light.” - Stanley Kubrick
http://sprites.pokecheck.org/i/054.gif
Big McLargehuge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2011, 05:36 PM
  #25
mirimon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Wrong Town
Country: Sweden
Posts: 2,780
vCash: 500
sometimes...


Last edited by mirimon: 07-04-2011 at 06:52 PM. Reason: ...i'm stupid
mirimon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:55 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.