HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > Philadelphia Flyers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Flyers Beat Writers' "Sources" Claims: Made-Up or Real?

View Poll Results: Flyers Beat Writers' "Source" Claims: Made-Up or Real?
Made-Up 7 21.21%
Real 6 18.18%
Not Made-Up But Greatly Exaggerated 20 60.61%
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-09-2011, 04:56 AM
  #1
BillDineen
Registered User
 
BillDineen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,894
vCash: 500
Flyers Beat Writers' "Sources" Claims: Made-Up or Real?

We have heard "sources" say the Flyers are/were interested in Stamkos, Handzus, trading Bob, etc.

Most seem to come from Tim P., Frank S. or Sam C. (Eklund doesn't count).

Do you believe them or are they made up to get devoted fans to read their articles/blogs?

IMO, Bill Meltzer is the only writer with credibility that calls it as he sees it and does not make things up.

BillDineen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 05:00 AM
  #2
ChumpyG
Jibbity jibbity
 
ChumpyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Country: Sami
Posts: 2,722
vCash: 500
I sometimes think they get a certain amount of money per post on HFboards that talks about one of their articles citing "sources".

ChumpyG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 05:47 AM
  #3
ugiswrong
Registered User
 
ugiswrong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: deutschland
Country: United States
Posts: 789
vCash: 500
Meltzer's good but he doesn't connect that well emotionally with his audience; it's more of a credibility and objectivity show with him.

I wish the writers could work more collaboratively together, it'd be fun to read an article written by all of them together.

ugiswrong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 07:59 AM
  #4
Hockeypete49
How you like me now!
 
Hockeypete49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Jersey
Country: Isle of Man
Posts: 4,561
vCash: 500
No Comment! Next Question Please! No Comment!

Hockeypete49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 08:24 AM
  #5
MsWoof
Registered User
 
MsWoof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,200
vCash: 500
ASF isn't as bad but all 3 of them and their damned unnamed sources drive me mad. Baicker and Seravalli also repeatedly write about their sources way too much. My opinion is name them or don't use them. It also annoys me that the Flyers allow this to continue but at the same time, ASF posted in a response to a blog that they've done it for years. They'll give a scoop based on anonimity and the next day, the same person will deny the quote.

MsWoof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 10:02 AM
  #6
SeanL44
Welcome to Hellbow
 
SeanL44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 1,270
vCash: 500
A lot of times their "sources" are just other beat writers.

SeanL44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 10:29 AM
  #7
MiamiScreamingEagles
Global Moderator
A Fistful of Dollars
 
MiamiScreamingEagles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 40,482
vCash: 691
It's the nature of that business. It's competition but in the age of electronic media the stories and updates are instantaneous and therefore are more pronounced. When newspapers were a primary source of info, more so that the current element, the need to update wasn't as quick. We get that now, especially after games, when there is an injury to report: according to sources player X was having his ankle taped. It is up to the reader to decipher what he/she wants to consider accurate. With he internet, all it takes is one person to promote someone else's tweet or blog and then magically that info is deemed gospel or ridiculed, but it gets attention. No media member with a shred of credibility would fabricate a source; however, the competitive essence of the modern industry contributes to what could ultimately be disproved.

MiamiScreamingEagles is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 10:29 AM
  #8
Boxscore
#oldNHL
 
Boxscore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 1974-94
Posts: 5,079
vCash: 500
Tim P. blogs for Eklund and Sarah Baicker interns with Tim P. Anyone see the connection? The other guys need to keep up with the Joneses. Meltzer is the best Philly writer that covers the Flyers. Most credible at least.

Boxscore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 10:39 AM
  #9
wahoowa
All in the Game
 
wahoowa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Country: United States
Posts: 945
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillDineen View Post
We have heard "sources" say the Flyers are/were interested in Stamkos, Handzus, trading Bob, etc.

Most seem to come from Tim P., Frank S. or Sam C. (Eklund doesn't count).

Do you believe them or are they made up to get devoted fans to read their articles/blogs?

IMO, Bill Meltzer is the only writer with credibility that calls it as he sees it and does not make things up.
I'm going to give Eklund some credit, he's actually broken a couple trades in the past few years that everyone originally scoffed at. He's certainly not a definitive source by any means but I think he's overcome his own stigma by quite a bit.

wahoowa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 10:51 AM
  #10
MsWoof
Registered User
 
MsWoof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,200
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by wahoowa View Post
I'm going to give Eklund some credit, he's actually broken a couple trades in the past few years that everyone originally scoffed at. He's certainly not a definitive source by any means but I think he's overcome his own stigma by quite a bit.
He's connected to Philly so breaking the Richards deal was a feather in his cap. What else did he break?

MsWoof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 10:55 AM
  #11
ToTheNet
Registered User
 
ToTheNet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Holland, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 3,284
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to ToTheNet
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustafsson View Post
Tim P. blogs for Eklund and Sarah Baicker interns with Tim P. Anyone see the connection? The other guys need to keep up with the Joneses. Meltzer is the best Philly writer that covers the Flyers. Most credible at least.
Sarah Baicker does not intern for Tim P.

ToTheNet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 11:02 AM
  #12
Jester
Registered User
 
Jester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Andrews
Country: Scotland
Posts: 34,075
vCash: 500
If you are writing for a legit paper there are rules governing sources. They are not just making stuff up.

Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 11:04 AM
  #13
Jester
Registered User
 
Jester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Andrews
Country: Scotland
Posts: 34,075
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MsWoof View Post
He's connected to Philly so breaking the Richards deal was a feather in his cap. What else did he break?
He did very well last summer.

Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 11:20 AM
  #14
StandingCow
Registered User
 
StandingCow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 3,607
vCash: 500
I really wouldn't be surprised if they watched hockey forums with fans to get some of the rumors.

StandingCow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 11:30 AM
  #15
Protest
C`est La Vie
 
Protest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Deptford, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 4,462
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MsWoof View Post
ASF isn't as bad but all 3 of them and their damned unnamed sources drive me mad. Baicker and Seravalli also repeatedly write about their sources way too much. My opinion is name them or don't use them. It also annoys me that the Flyers allow this to continue but at the same time, ASF posted in a response to a blog that they've done it for years. They'll give a scoop based on anonimity and the next day, the same person will deny the quote.
Guessing you're not a writer or reporter.

You don't ever name your sources...ever. Its one of the major rules of journalism. I said this when that guy was talking about how his sources were saying Richards and Carter were being moved. I didn't necessarily believe the guy, but I said his "sources" would be proved if what he was saying actually happened, and not by him giving out their name.

Protest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 11:53 AM
  #16
Jester
Registered User
 
Jester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Andrews
Country: Scotland
Posts: 34,075
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Protest View Post
Guessing you're not a writer or reporter.

You don't ever name your sources...ever. Its one of the major rules of journalism. I said this when that guy was talking about how his sources were saying Richards and Carter were being moved. I didn't necessarily believe the guy, but I said his "sources" would be proved if what he was saying actually happened, and not by him giving out their name.
This isn't true at all. The recent rise of anonymous sources to such prevalence (and it is a recent development) has been terrible for "journalism". Turns them into little more than organs of biased information. Less of a problem in sports, but a massive problem in politics.

Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 11:57 AM
  #17
EasyMac
Registered User
 
EasyMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kingston
Country: Canada
Posts: 834
vCash: 500
I think everyone also has to remember, that not all trade negotiations end up in a deal. I am sure there are many times in which journalists have sources say "Team A is in talks with Team B about Player X" and then no trade is ever made. It doesn't mean the source was lying, it could just be that a deal both GM's were comfortable with was never found.

EasyMac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 12:01 PM
  #18
Jester
Registered User
 
Jester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Andrews
Country: Scotland
Posts: 34,075
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by EasyMac View Post
I think everyone also has to remember, that not all trade negotiations end up in a deal. I am sure there are many times in which journalists have sources say "Team A is in talks with Team B about Player X" and then no trade is ever made. It doesn't mean the source was lying, it could just be that a deal both GM's were comfortable with was never found.
Yep, primary problem with the criticism Eklund gets. I think he's an idiot in most of his editorials, but he makes no bones about the fact that he has zero filter between sources and readers... Thus he's going to have a very low success rate.

Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 12:31 PM
  #19
Coppy
Good Luck Richie!
 
Coppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 930
vCash: 500
I put it more on people overreacting to everything that is written. Teams talk to eachother all the time. Most of the time, nothing comes of these talks. Someone covering the team writes that these teams are talking, and everyone expects something to happen.

Day 1: A Writer reports the Flyers are trying to trade for Stamkos

Days 1-5: After a lot of negotiating, Homer decides the price tag is just to high and breaks off negotiations.

Day 7: Flyers don't trade for Stamkos and people just assume the writter lied and made up that sources were saying that.

Coppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 12:46 PM
  #20
Jester
Registered User
 
Jester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Andrews
Country: Scotland
Posts: 34,075
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coppy View Post
I put it more on people overreacting to everything that is written. Teams talk to eachother all the time. Most of the time, nothing comes of these talks. Someone covering the team writes that these teams are talking, and everyone expects something to happen.

Day 1: A Writer reports the Flyers are trying to trade for Stamkos

Days 1-5: After a lot of negotiating, Homer decides the price tag is just to high and breaks off negotiations.

Day 7: Flyers don't trade for Stamkos and people just assume the writter lied and made up that sources were saying that.
Yep, there's a cognitive disconnect (for whatever reason) between "rumor" and "fact" which reporters get unfairly criticized for.

Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 01:19 PM
  #21
Giroux tha Damaja
Registered User
 
Giroux tha Damaja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mount Holly, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 9,231
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Giroux tha Damaja
I chose real. Along with Jester's and Coppy's points, sometimes a real source just isn't a very good source. That doesn't mean the reporter made it up.

Giroux tha Damaja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 01:23 PM
  #22
Jester
Registered User
 
Jester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Andrews
Country: Scotland
Posts: 34,075
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giroux tha Damaja View Post
I chose real. Along with Jester's and Coppy's points, sometimes a real source just isn't a very good source. That doesn't mean the reporter made it up.
Yep, and this is the big difference between "reporters" -- real journalists -- and what Eklund is doing. A journalist is supposed to display some discretion in what s/he reports, and actually analyze fact from fiction. This is the real problem with anonymous sources, because they are anonymous the reader has no idea where the information is coming from, and no way to determine what biases may be in play. Similarly, the "journalist" cannot really engage in their job because of the given anonymity.

As said, in sports, who the F cares? In the grander scheme, it's diluting the quality of writing that the public is getting from "journalists". In many cases, political journalists have turned into little more than mouthpieces for various factions and individuals who they allow to get a message out without putting their name to that message.

Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 01:28 PM
  #23
MiamiScreamingEagles
Global Moderator
A Fistful of Dollars
 
MiamiScreamingEagles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 40,482
vCash: 691
Since Mark Howe is in the news...

After the 1984 season, there was a rumor circulating that the Flyers would send Mark Howe and Ilkka Sinisalo to Detroit for Reed Larson and Ron Duguay.

Another had Michel Goulet and Dale Hunter from Quebec to Philly for Mark Howe, Brian Propp and Tim Kerr (who asked to be traded over a contract battle).

Sources and rumors are historic but get punctuated with today's immediacy and availability of resources.

MiamiScreamingEagles is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 04:26 PM
  #24
Haute Couturier
Registered User
 
Haute Couturier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 5,972
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coppy View Post
I put it more on people overreacting to everything that is written. Teams talk to eachother all the time. Most of the time, nothing comes of these talks. Someone covering the team writes that these teams are talking, and everyone expects something to happen.

Day 1: A Writer reports the Flyers are trying to trade for Stamkos

Days 1-5: After a lot of negotiating, Homer decides the price tag is just to high and breaks off negotiations.

Day 7: Flyers don't trade for Stamkos and people just assume the writter lied and made up that sources were saying that.
Although I agree this tends to happen, I am not sure this specific instance is an example of fans overreacting. The Stamkos situation was fishy to me because we were given conflicting information. Seravalli and San Filippo were told by their sources that the Flyers were going to offer sheet him and we even given the dollar amount while Carchidi and Panaccio were told it wasn't going to happen and that they expected Stamkos to remain in Tampa. So clearly someone had to be wrong on this considering there were conflicting sources.

To me this Stamkos stuff never smelled right. I don't believe a team would be so public with their intentions to the point where they give the dollar amount of the contract that they were contemplating. Personally I don't believe they were ever going after Stamkos just like I don't believe Tampa was ever considering letting him go via offer sheet or through a trade.

Then we have Seravalli saying the Flyers signed Handzus on July 1, only for Bob McKenzie to shoot it down and said the Flyers didn't even talk to Handzus. It was also reported on July 1 that the Flyers signed Braydon Coburn to an extension which also turned out to be false. I believe it was Anthony Sam Filippo who reported on the Coburn signing that didn't happen.

There is clearly some bad information being reported and it's not just people overreacting. I don't believe these writers are making up stuff, but I do believe they either have a sketchy source or they have a credible source that is flat out lying to them for whatever reason.

Haute Couturier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2011, 04:54 PM
  #25
MsWoof
Registered User
 
MsWoof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,200
vCash: 500
Wouldn't surprise me if the sources like to throw in the odd crazy thing to see who will write about it and look like a fool.

I prefer to see a writer like Elliotte Friedman who writes 30 Thoughts weekly during the season. Here's an excerpt:

http://www.cbc.ca/sports/blogs/ellio...-thoughts.html

Quote:
9) When Philadelphia fell behind Boston 3-0 in the second round, one individual said to me, "Here's a 30 Thought for you: how about the Flyers without Carter and Richards next year?" I said, "I'm not writing that. I'm going to look like an idiot." I was as astonished as anyone else, but it's clear Philly was quietly considering the possibility for awhile. This was not a snap decision.
Even though the person who told him was correct, he didn't want to write about it because he'd look like a fool. If he had written about it and the trades didn't happen, he would have been ridiculed. I just don't see any reason for writers to act like the Philly ones because they're all about sensationalism.

MsWoof is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.