HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Andrew MacDonald

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
07-16-2011, 09:25 PM
  #1
uncleben85
My face is my mask.
 
uncleben85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,309
vCash: 500
Andrew MacDonald

Just curious on how valuable he really is.
He has really flown under the radar playing with the Islanders, but i honestly think he was one of, if not the, best defencemen on the team last season.

uncleben85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-16-2011, 09:27 PM
  #2
Phion Keneuf
Top Dawg Ent.
 
Phion Keneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vaughan, Ontario
Country: Italy
Posts: 24,314
vCash: 50
Hamonic was better imo... i'd offer a 2nd + decent-good prospect

Phion Keneuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-16-2011, 09:39 PM
  #3
M Moulson Ale
It's back, I'm back
 
M Moulson Ale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 2,663
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phion Keneuf View Post
Hamonic was better imo... i'd offer a 2nd + decent-good prospect
Hamonic was good physically, but amac led this defense with streit and eaton out
He put up good offensive numbers and played great defense
I'd say his value is pretty high since his contract is a bargain and his overall game is solid

M Moulson Ale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-16-2011, 09:44 PM
  #4
WangMustGo
NYI
 
WangMustGo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 2,697
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by M Moulson Ale View Post
Hamonic was good physically, but amac led this defense with streit and eaton out
He put up good offensive numbers and played great defense
I'd say his value is pretty high since his contract is a bargain and his overall game is solid
This, although Hamonic has much higher upside. I think Macdonald is a decent middle pairing guy right now, with potential to be a very good number 3 defenseman, whereas Hamonic has potential to be a #1 defenseman IMO.

He is definitely not available, his contract is a steal, and he is one of our 3 legit top 4 defenseman, we need more defenseman not less.

WangMustGo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-16-2011, 10:03 PM
  #5
M Moulson Ale
It's back, I'm back
 
M Moulson Ale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 2,663
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by WangMustGo View Post
This, although Hamonic has much higher upside. I think Macdonald is a decent middle pairing guy right now, with potential to be a very good number 3 defenseman, whereas Hamonic has potential to be a #1 defenseman IMO.

He is definitely not available, his contract is a steal, and he is one of our 3 legit top 4 defenseman, we need more defenseman not less.
I agree, hamonic has the potential to be a weber type player

M Moulson Ale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-16-2011, 10:48 PM
  #6
shadow1
Registered User
 
shadow1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 10,662
vCash: 500
Name your price, man. This guy was a beast last year. Came out of no where to play a ton of minutes with the Isle and looked good in the process.

shadow1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-16-2011, 11:16 PM
  #7
hskates21*
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 758
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phion Keneuf View Post
Hamonic was better imo... i'd offer a 2nd + decent-good prospect
No Amac was easily the better player

Edit: maybe not easily but nonetheless macdonald was the better defenseman

hskates21* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-16-2011, 11:40 PM
  #8
startainfection
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4,413
vCash: 500
i see him as a 2nd pairing dman that can seamlessly step up to the first pairing incase of injury and his contract is one of the best in the league, hes pretty untouchable unless the islanders get blown out of the water and he is only going to get better hes was only a sophmore this season and i liked him just as much when he was called up from the bridge, i dont think the islanders are trading him unless they get completely blown away

startainfection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-16-2011, 11:44 PM
  #9
CREW99AW
Registered User
 
CREW99AW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 24,055
vCash: 200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phion Keneuf View Post
Hamonic was better imo... i'd offer a 2nd + decent-good prospect

I loved how Harmonic played,but felt MacDonald played as well if not better.
Hamonic being so impressive as a 20 yr old rookie,really has nothing to do with MacDonald's value.

After Snow politely declines,he laughs his azz off.24 yr old MacDonald played over 22 mins a game this season.Quality mins.His $500,000 salary is a bargain.

that 2nd?When is it joining the nhl team and contributing?In 3-4 yrs if the isles are lucky.
That decent-good prospect gets lost among the glut of NYI prospects.

CREW99AW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-16-2011, 11:45 PM
  #10
Kevin27NYI
Global Moderator
 
Kevin27NYI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 7,642
vCash: 400
MacDonald was better.

He is literally priceless given he is under contract for 550k for 3 more years.

Kevin27NYI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-16-2011, 11:50 PM
  #11
Phion Keneuf
Top Dawg Ent.
 
Phion Keneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vaughan, Ontario
Country: Italy
Posts: 24,314
vCash: 50
Wow I never knew his contract was that good .... Forget the 2nd + mid-level prospect

Phion Keneuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2011, 12:00 AM
  #12
SLAPSHOT723
MM
 
SLAPSHOT723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 13,594
vCash: 500
You can't have him. We need to add another defenseman, not subtract.

SLAPSHOT723 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2011, 01:10 AM
  #13
uncleben85
My face is my mask.
 
uncleben85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,309
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLAPSHOT723 View Post
You can't have him. We need to add another defenseman, not subtract.
take komisarek.
or sign mccabe at least

uncleben85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2011, 01:11 AM
  #14
Kevin27NYI
Global Moderator
 
Kevin27NYI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 7,642
vCash: 400
Quote:
Originally Posted by uncleben85 View Post
take komisarek.
or sign mccabe at least
We need a top 4 dman. Those two are not.

Kevin27NYI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2011, 09:01 AM
  #15
M Moulson Ale
It's back, I'm back
 
M Moulson Ale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 2,663
vCash: 50
And if you think about, MacDonald has made a great climb to get to where he is
He was a 6th round pick
Did not look good at first in the AHL, went to the ECHL
Looked good going back to the AHL
Got his stints with the Islanders, played well
Basically pushed out Andy Sutton from the Isles defense to make room for himself, receiving that four year extension (Sutton was later traded)

M Moulson Ale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2011, 09:09 AM
  #16
Brian Boyle
Global Moderator
 
Brian Boyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Nutley, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 34,360
vCash: 1716
A legitimate #2/#3 defenseman making $550,000K for the next few seasons?

I'd say there is about a 0% chance he is moved. His value is through the roof.

__________________

John Moore - A Star In The Making; A Look Into the Rangers Upcoming Offseason; Rangers Unlimited
Follow me on Twitter at @SMartiniqueTHW for NYR and NHL news/opinions.
Brian Boyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2011, 09:35 AM
  #17
SLAPSHOT723
MM
 
SLAPSHOT723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 13,594
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by uncleben85 View Post
take komisarek.
or sign mccabe at least
People need to realize that Garth isn't going to just take Komisarek. He's horrible.

SLAPSHOT723 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2011, 10:05 AM
  #18
CodeE
Registered User
 
CodeE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 2,055
vCash: 500
Only legit way I can see AMac moved is for one of the top RFAs on the market, if they back Garth into a corner. Sorta like Schenn in the Richards deal - the key piece Los Angeles never wanted to move in the first place, but rationalize it because they got Mike Richards.

If Garth wants Doughty/Weber/Stamkos/Parise, the asking price will start with one of Hamonic/AMac (if the other team wants the deal built around defense, otherwise Tavares/Grabner/Nino/Strome is heading back), another player/prospect or two, and maybe some picks.

Any attempts to acquire AMac for prospects, picks, or typical hfboards "take my trash" proposals would be laughed off.

CodeE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2011, 10:08 AM
  #19
SLAPSHOT723
MM
 
SLAPSHOT723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 13,594
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CodeE View Post
Only legit way I can see AMac moved is for one of the top RFAs on the market, if they back Garth into a corner. Sorta like Schenn in the Richards deal - the key piece Los Angeles never wanted to move in the first place, but rationalize it because they got Mike Richards.

If Garth wants Doughty/Weber/Stamkos/Parise, the asking price will start with one of Hamonic/AMac (if the other team wants the deal built around defense, otherwise Tavares/Grabner/Nino/Strome is heading back), another player/prospect or two, and maybe some picks.

Any attempts to acquire AMac for prospects, picks, or typical hfboards "take my trash" proposals would be laughed off.
AMac should be considered untouchable at his salary. If he was being paid fair value, I'd think about trading him for an upgrade, but he's such a bargain that I wouldn't think about moving him.

SLAPSHOT723 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2011, 10:14 AM
  #20
CodeE
Registered User
 
CodeE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 2,055
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLAPSHOT723 View Post
AMac should be considered untouchable at his salary. If he was being paid fair value, I'd think about trading him for an upgrade, but he's such a bargain that I wouldn't think about moving him.
If Weber prices himself out of Nashville, and they offer something like MacDonald/Comeau/Koskinen, I think Snow pulls the trigger. Nashville would probably want more than that, but for the sake of my example, it works.

Tavares is really the only untouchable player because everyone else in our system I'd trade for Stamkos

CodeE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2011, 12:06 PM
  #21
uncleben85
My face is my mask.
 
uncleben85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,309
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLAPSHOT723 View Post
People need to realize that Garth isn't going to just take Komisarek. He's horrible.
coming from a leafs fan, i wouldnt say he's horrible.
he is by no means the player he once was, and for his contract, hes bad, but not horrible. and he's turned into a really good team guy

reality is you guys NEED more salary. he may not be a top 4 guy but the top four you have right now actually isnt that bad, plugging komi in as even a number 6 would add some stability and get you that much closer to the floor.

thats why i also suggested mccabe. except hes an even better leader, has learned to play a more responsible game in florida, can put up a lot better numbers and still brings you closer to the floor.

cory stillman on forward would also be a wise choice to help out the salary. obviously none of these guys are top4/top6 players anymore, but your team missed out by choosing to sign no one. youre not going to get top players while keeping your roster intact anymore


EDIT: For the record, this nvr was a Komisarek FOR MacDonald thread lmfao. Originally wanted to know AMac's value, then secondarily some one said Isles needed another D, so i suggested Komi. Komi for a pick, or Komi and a pick for a minor leaguer or smthg ******.


Last edited by uncleben85: 07-17-2011 at 12:11 PM.
uncleben85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2011, 12:11 PM
  #22
Brian Boyle
Global Moderator
 
Brian Boyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Nutley, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 34,360
vCash: 1716
Komisarek is a #6 defenseman who holds a $4.5M cap hit for the next 3 years; there is also a NMC in his contract.

I don't think any team would take him for free. Certainly not the Isles, who will likely be looking to add significant pieces during free agency in the summer of '12/'13, where Komisarek could potentially hinder that ability.

Brian Boyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2011, 12:25 PM
  #23
Karlssonlee
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,372
vCash: 500
1st round pick imo. anywhere from 18-25

Karlssonlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2011, 12:40 PM
  #24
blinkman360
Robb Stark Lives
 
blinkman360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,077
vCash: 500
I just can't see the Isles dealing MacDonald alone for any sort of package. The only way I see them dealing him anytime soon is if he is part of a package to bring in an elite player. Right now, at the salary he is making, I don't see how dealing him makes any sense. So I'd say what it would cost to get him is probably a lot higher than his actual value(which is pretty high to begin with).

MacDonald, Hamonic and de Haan will be a part of the Isles defensive core for a long time. I think they will want to build around them, not break them apart.

blinkman360 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2011, 01:17 PM
  #25
SteenMachine
Registered User
 
SteenMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fenton, MO
Country: United States
Posts: 3,402
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by uncleben85 View Post
take komisarek.
or sign mccabe at least


"I'm hungry"
Have this bag of vomit I can't seem to get rid of... or at least lick that turd on the ground.

SteenMachine is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.