HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Cody Franson is Available

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
10-25-2011, 12:15 PM
  #1
caley
Moderator
 
caley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,227
vCash: 500
Cody Franson is Available

In a Daily Debate column on ESPN, while discussing the rumors that Montreal is looking for a defenceman, Pierre LeBrun mentioned this which has been supposed recently, but this is the first time I've seen it from an actual good source.

Quote:
It just so happens that Cody Franson is available in Toronto, although I'm not sure whether any of those three teams has interest in him.
http://espn.go.com/blog/nhl/post/_/i...ed-in-montreal

I'd be curious where he winds up. Part of this, I chalk up to Jake Gardiner passing him on the depth chart, and another part of this would stem to Brian Burke possibly being annoyed at Franson complaining about not playing, but it also seems there was maybe something to all those Predators fans who suggested Franson's numbers were a by-product of being well-protected by coach Barry Trotz.

caley is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:19 PM
  #2
Hulk Hogan*
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,901
vCash: 500
The Leafs have enormous depth on the blue line and I can see them packaging off Franson and Bozak along with Komisarek as a cap dump for a top 2 centre or top six forward.

Hulk Hogan* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:20 PM
  #3
Giggli G
Registered User
 
Giggli G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,296
vCash: 500
Franson for Omark+

Giggli G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:21 PM
  #4
bleedblue1223
OMAHA!!!
 
bleedblue1223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 19,803
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agi View Post
The Leafs have enormous depth on the blue line and I can see them packaging off Franson and Bozak along with Komisarek as a cap dump for a top 2 centre or top six forward.
That package won't get you a top 6 forward. Any package with Komisarek won't get you a top 6 forward.

bleedblue1223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:22 PM
  #5
Soundgarden
Registered User
 
Soundgarden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Spring Hill, TN
Country: United States
Posts: 6,223
vCash: 562
I still see him getting a 2nd-3rd round pick or a middle of the road kind of prospect. I'm sure a few teams could be interested in a 3rd Pairing PP specialist.

Soundgarden is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:25 PM
  #6
Richiebottles
Big Mike !
 
Richiebottles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,621
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agi View Post
The Leafs have enormous depth on the blue line and I can see them packaging off Franson and Bozak along with Komisarek as a cap dump for a top 2 centre or top six forward.
I can see the Habs doing Bozak+ Franson for AK.

Richiebottles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:26 PM
  #7
oilsands
shut 'em down.
 
oilsands's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Halland
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,708
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giggli G View Post
Franson for Omark-
Fixed it for you.

oilsands is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:27 PM
  #8
Clipitar
Registered User
 
Clipitar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,383
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesWiznewski View Post
I can see the Habs doing Bozak+ Franson for AK.
No thank you, I'd much rather keep AK.

Clipitar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:30 PM
  #9
CB Joe
Registered User
 
CB Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,479
vCash: 496
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agi View Post
The Leafs have enormous depth on the blue line and I can see them packaging off Franson and Bozak along with Komisarek as a cap dump for a top 2 centre or top six forward.
You won't get a top 6 player if the other team has to take Komisarek's salary.

CB Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:32 PM
  #10
playasRus
Registered User
 
playasRus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,951
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesWiznewski View Post
I can see the Habs doing Bozak+ Franson for AK.
AK and Grabovski on the same team again?

playasRus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:33 PM
  #11
Richiebottles
Big Mike !
 
Richiebottles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,621
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by playasRus View Post
AK and Grabovski on the same team again?
You know it. It would be a terrible deal for the Habs but i just see it coming

Richiebottles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:35 PM
  #12
Boondock
Registered User
 
Boondock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,615
vCash: 500
I think that Columbus, Montreal, NYR and Edmonton should look at Franson as an option. He is a capable 3rd pairing guy who can play the point on the 2nd unit PP. Would the Leafs accept an early 3rd from C-Bus or Edmonton?

Boondock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:36 PM
  #13
Blind Gardien
Global Moderator
nexus of the crisis
 
Blind Gardien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Four Winds Bar
Country: France
Posts: 19,369
vCash: 500
Don't see the Habs being interested in Franson. Diaz has fit in nicely and Weber has shown progression and is starting to play more minutes effectively. Franson may have a bigger/taller body than those guys, but I don't see him displacing them or representing any significant upgrade.

I don't see bottom-pairing/shelter-requiring depth defenseman as being a need for the Habs. They could use a top-4 guy who can do the sheltering, but nothing less. Hopefully Markov comes back and stays back and can provide that, since it seems like the market is going to offer mostly bottom-pairing guys, and the price for true top-4 reliability is understandably out of Montreal's reach.

Blind Gardien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:39 PM
  #14
Patty Ice
Best in the World
 
Patty Ice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: OxNard
Country: Northern Ireland
Posts: 10,192
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Patty Ice Send a message via MSN to Patty Ice
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agi View Post
The Leafs have enormous depth on the blue line and I can see them packaging off Franson and Bozak along with Komisarek as a cap dump for a top 2 centre or top six forward.
I'm sure they'll have an easy time finding a team willing to trade a top player for two decent players as well as take on a horrible contract. Teams would be lining up for that sweet offer.

__________________
Patty Ice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:40 PM
  #15
Koobs11
aka Back door Johnny
 
Koobs11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North
Posts: 1,621
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Koobs11
The islanders need to be all over this

Koobs11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:41 PM
  #16
Mike Jones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,130
vCash: 500
The Leafs will probably receive a 3rd round draft choice for him. Why would Burke try any harder to get more? The fact that Lombardi is playing decently makes that trade a win regardless of what happens to Franson.

Mike Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:41 PM
  #17
KovalSNIPE
Registered User
 
KovalSNIPE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 670
vCash: 500
Franson to Devils (E4)

KovalSNIPE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:43 PM
  #18
Hanta Yo
Bag it up
 
Hanta Yo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,100
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesWiznewski View Post
I can see the Habs doing Bozak+ Franson for AK.
Absolutely not. Not sure why people decide to throw in Bozak as if he was trash. He slots into our 3rd line perfectly, and has been solid so far this season. AK wouldn't fit anywhere on the Leafs lineup.

Hanta Yo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:45 PM
  #19
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Montreal could use him, but we dont have any Lebda to give back.

palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:46 PM
  #20
The Management
Registered User
 
The Management's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Newfoundland
Country: Canada
Posts: 569
vCash: 500
Darren Dreger mentioned on TSN Radio 1050 that the Leafs are only "mildly" interested in trading Franson.

That's if the right offer comes along because, as Dreger mentioned, it's still quite early in the season. The tenor of the conversation suggests teams are calling Toronto, inquiring about guys like Gunnarsson and Franson, not that Toronto is actively shopping either player (most notably Gunnarsson, whom they apparently have "no interest" in moving at this time).

If you're a GM, it's your job to listen to offers that come across the table from your colleagues throughout the league. With the depth we have on defense, and kids like Keith Aulie and Jesse Blacker fine-tuning their games for the big club, the Leafs can probably afford to part with some talent or potential on the back-end. What Brian Burke would be looking for in return (perhaps a draft pick if he doesn't see Franson in this team's long-term plans, perhaps a package with a more significant piece) is anybody's guess, really.

The Management is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:47 PM
  #21
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by playasRus View Post
AK and Grabovski on the same team again?
They never had problem playing together.

He had issue with Sergei, not Andrei.

palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:47 PM
  #22
WarriorofTime
Registered User
 
WarriorofTime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,451
vCash: 500
He was dumped by Nashville for a reason.. Can't even crack the lineup on a terrible defensive team. People that want this guy are going to be disappointed.

WarriorofTime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:47 PM
  #23
Rhodes 81
grit those teeth
 
Rhodes 81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Atlanta
Country: United States
Posts: 12,188
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by KovalSNIPE View Post
Franson to Devils (E4)
he couldn't be worse than whatever the **** the volchenkov-salvador pairing is doing that they call hockey.

Rhodes 81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:49 PM
  #24
conrad420
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 797
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Jones View Post
The Leafs will probably receive a 3rd round draft choice for him. Why would Burke try any harder to get more for him? The fact that Lombardi is playing decently makes that trade a win regardless of what happens to Franson.
Becasue thats what half decent GMs are supposed to do?? why wouldnt he try is the better question.

anyways i doubt he gets moved for 3rd rounder, seems to low and im sure burke would package him with someone else to get a top 6 forward.

conrad420 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2011, 12:51 PM
  #25
UAGoalieGuy
Registered User
 
UAGoalieGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Long Island,New York
Country: United States
Posts: 8,680
vCash: 500
I think i'd prefer Franson over Stralman for the Rangers. How's a 3rd or 4th round pick sound for him?

EDIT: Can he play the right side?

UAGoalieGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.