HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > Philadelphia Flyers
Notices

Should it have been Briere, and why not?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
10-27-2011, 10:12 PM
  #1
thephillyflu
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 231
vCash: 500
Should it have been Briere, and why not?

There was only ever talking about moving Carter and Richards this summer. Not Briere. Not even mentioned. But Briere was much higher paid and much worse in defense than both those guys without producing neither more points nor a better offense in large in regular season play. Also Briere only has a few good years left, while both Carter and Richards could (without injuries) be franchise players for 10+ years to come. Also Briere was a mercenary, Carter and Richards were home-drafted players who'd only ever represented Flyers in the NHL.

So why wasn't Briere considered for a trade? I can't believe it was because of his no movement clause, because those things are always possible to work around.

Was it because we wanted to be able to trade with every team in the league, starting a bidding war and yielding the highest return? I mean, since Briere at his age and pay would only ever yield a proper return from a contender, I have a hard time seeing Columbus trading for Briere to finish 8th in the Western Conference instead of 12th for 2 years and then back to 12th again... But even the worst team in the NHL would want a player like Carter or Richards, since they were only 25-26 at the time and probably (no bad luck with injuries) will get even better. Although I could see LA giving up Schenn and Simmonds for Briere, I don't think so, so that's a question. I could easily though see Sharks giving up Heatley or comparable for Briere, but that wouldn't help with cap space. So maybe he wouldn't have yielded as high of a return since he's 8 years older, and that's the full answer and I could stop at that.

But having a line up of centers in Richards, Giroux, Carter and "Talbot/Read/other cheap but quality 4th center" for 10 years to come would've been something...

Or maybe, it was because Briere is a reknown "clutch" playoff performer, and Carter has hardly got a chance to prove anything in the playoffs with his injuries. Richards though has shown some really solid playoff ice hockey, though not on Briere level but close.

Or was it maybe as the rumours said, that Carter and Richards were unprofessional and didn't seem to accept that being a franchise star is a 24/7 job? That they partied too hard, didn't take being leading players seriously enough, and set a bad example for younger players? And if that's so, why the fück did they get the C and the A respectively? Seems pretty contradictory to me. So is that the reason or is it just media and fan speculation? I have a hard time accepting Richards as a bad influence, since few players in the flyers shirt has fought that hard and endured as much pain for the team. Carter was also known for playing through loads of pain.

I never thought of them as players with a bad attitude, but the media and fan speculation kept saying so, so I don't know what to believe.

Or was it about both Richards and Carter having "hard to ever heal completely"-injuries as in complicated fractures in complicated places as wrist and ankle, and we made a bet on their health (a bet against)?

So, how is it? Was it just a question about yielding the highest but for the time being, cheapest (in $), return? Or was it a question of wanting to win the cup in a few years time, before Briere's done. Or was it a question of Holmgren not being able to move Briere even if he wanted? Or was it because of Carter/Richards possible bad attitude? Or their injuries?

I'm not talking about trading last summer in general, I'm talking about why the choice was Richards AND Carter instead of just either one or neither one but Briere or one of them AND Briere. Why? I don't question the trades, in a few years if Voracek, Simmonds, Schenn and Couturier develop as expected, becoming solid 2nd liners all four of them in 3-4 years time, it's great. Though there's always the risk that Carter will score 50 goals and 35 assists in three years time and Richards 35+50 with a Selke to boot and become the superstars one might've thought a couple of years ago. But even then we might still be winners in the long run. I'm just wondering about the choice, between the three top expensive centers, why it was those two? Is there a simple answer or is it a combination of all the possible reasons I suggested..? Help me out, please!

thephillyflu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2011, 10:15 PM
  #2
RevUpThoseGolfCarts
Experts at losing
 
RevUpThoseGolfCarts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 1,810
vCash: 500
Briere wasn't pounding every day and night

RevUpThoseGolfCarts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2011, 10:18 PM
  #3
FreshPerspective
We don't need one!
 
FreshPerspective's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Country: Italy
Posts: 10,252
vCash: 500
Why don't you just change the title of the thread to " Why did we trade Carter and Richards?"

Suggest you use the search function to gain some insight into your inquiry.....

FreshPerspective is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2011, 10:18 PM
  #4
Damaged Goods
Registered User
 
Damaged Goods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 2,026
vCash: 500
NTCs, age, return value, # of years remaining on contracts, playoff performances, Carter and Richards being best friends...

Damaged Goods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2011, 10:20 PM
  #5
czechmate25
Registered User
 
czechmate25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Hershey, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,188
vCash: 500
Maybe Briere wasn't the one who had any part in dividing the locker room?

czechmate25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2011, 10:40 PM
  #6
Philadelphia Ducks
#BringBackBob
 
Philadelphia Ducks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,267
vCash: 500
Briere is a class act who has his stuff together off the ice. He has mentored many of the young players and let Roo and now Couts move in with him. You really don't trade players like Briere who have so many intangibles off the ice.

Philadelphia Ducks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2011, 10:42 PM
  #7
Haute Couturier
Registered User
 
Haute Couturier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 5,972
vCash: 500
It depends on the reason for the trades. If it was solely a cap deal then Briere should have been shipped out before either of them.

Haute Couturier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2011, 11:15 PM
  #8
MsWoof
Registered User
 
MsWoof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,865
vCash: 500
He won't go anywhere because he has 3 young kids and his ex-wife lives in the area. He can't expect her to follow him around anymore now that they're not married, so if ever there was a time for a player to dig in his heels and say I'm not going anywhere, this is it. They can try doing what they did to Gagne but it's different with this kind of family situation. Besides, who would Couturier live with? He might move in with another young guy and, you know, go out drinking from time to time.

MsWoof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2011, 11:51 PM
  #9
Sawdalite
AbleWasIEreISawLupul
 
Sawdalite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Girouxsalem
Posts: 5,341
vCash: 500
#1 Briere's full NMC and Richards and Carter's NTCs not yet in place... When their clauses kicked in they would be in control... the timing was ripe to move them.

#2 It may be a case where the Organization decided that they did NOT want Richards and Carter to be the core going forward for another decade... they'd rather have more flexibility in the Cap Era and go with Giroux, Read and (as it turned out) Schenn, Simmonds, Voracek and a high selection as their Core forwards along with the players they kept for the next few years and re-sign them or move them later as they saw fit.

#3 They wanted a new Leadership Core Group that centered around Pronger and Kimmo and officially add Briere and work in Giroux and other young players... obtaining other strong character players such as Talbot... and eliminating their Captain, Richards and an Alternate, Carter who they may have felt were no leading in the proper manner.

#4 They may have wanted to shore up their standing with the Media and stop the obvious war with them and furnish better representation after games and during and after the season... Richards was not a friend to the local Media and Carter was not one who furnished well thought out and convey thoughts about games as a player like Knuble once did... Briere on the other hand was and remains a well sought after player by the Media who was well liked... They changed the sanding with the Media by elimination and bringing back Briere.

#5 The Organization wanted a 'Culture' change and moving Richards and Carter served that purpose... Moving Briere would no have accomplished that.

#6 Briere was and still is a great presence in the Room and with the young players... as mention by another he is a good mentor... Richards and Carter were not.

#7 Briere plays at near a PPG pace during the Regular Season and has been at better than a PPG player with the Flyers in the Postseason.

#8 Briere had only a few seasons left in his contract and Carter and Richards had many more remaining... In a few seasons he Flyers would have another $17M+ to work with rather than $6M+.

#9 Briere has been a good soldier in his time here and has moved around the lines and forward positions with neither complaint nor problem nor effect on output... Except for one major injury he has been in the lineup and played through injury... While Richards has also, he has had ups and downs... Carter was a strongman and then seems to now get hurt more often and also has more ups and downs and seems to be more effected with being moved around.

#10 Briere has proved to make players better when playing with them... IMO that has not been the case with Richards and Carter.

Sawdalite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-28-2011, 12:04 AM
  #10
Prongo
Beer
 
Prongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 13,859
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sawdalite View Post
#1 Briere's full NMC and Richards and Carter's NTCs not yet in place... When their clauses kicked in they would be in control... the timing was ripe to move them.

#2 It may be a case where the Organization decided that they did NOT want Richards and Carter to be the core going forward for another decade... they'd rather have more flexibility in the Cap Era and go with Giroux, Read and (as it turned out) Schenn, Simmonds, Voracek and a high selection as their Core forwards along with the players they kept for the next few years and re-sign them or move them later as they saw fit.

#3 They wanted a new Leadership Core Group that centered around Pronger and Kimmo and officially add Briere and work in Giroux and other young players... obtaining other strong character players such as Talbot... and eliminating their Captain, Richards and an Alternate, Carter who they may have felt were no leading in the proper manner.

#4 They may have wanted to shore up their standing with the Media and stop the obvious war with them and furnish better representation after games and during and after the season... Richards was not a friend to the local Media and Carter was not one who furnished well thought out and convey thoughts about games as a player like Knuble once did... Briere on the other hand was and remains a well sought after player by the Media who was well liked... They changed the sanding with the Media by elimination and bringing back Briere.

#5 The Organization wanted a 'Culture' change and moving Richards and Carter served that purpose... Moving Briere would no have accomplished that.

#6 Briere was and still is a great presence in the Room and with the young players... as mention by another he is a good mentor... Richards and Carter were not.

#7 Briere plays at near a PPG pace during the Regular Season and has been at better than a PPG player with the Flyers in the Postseason.

#8 Briere had only a few seasons left in his contract and Carter and Richards had many more remaining... In a few seasons he Flyers would have another $17M+ to work with rather than $6M+.

#9 Briere has been a good soldier in his time here and has moved around the lines and forward positions with neither complaint nor problem nor effect on output... Except for one major injury he has been in the lineup and played through injury... While Richards has also, he has had ups and downs... Carter was a strongman and then seems to now get hurt more often and also has more ups and downs and seems to be more effected with being moved around.

#10 Briere has proved to make players better when playing with them... IMO that has not been the case with Richards and Carter.
I believe this pretty much sums it up

Prongo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-28-2011, 12:07 AM
  #11
FreshPerspective
We don't need one!
 
FreshPerspective's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Country: Italy
Posts: 10,252
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyersfan9180 View Post
I believe this pretty much sums it up
Too much of an eyesore explanation

This is what it comes down to....


Holmgren is stupid.....

FreshPerspective is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-28-2011, 12:15 AM
  #12
Arigold*
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8
vCash: 500
Briere plays hockey minus the drama. Also hes a mentor to Giroux in the offseason. Something has to go really bad for that to happen.

Arigold* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-28-2011, 12:16 AM
  #13
SolidSnakeUS
Registered User
 
SolidSnakeUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pipersville, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 29,260
vCash: 500
Losing Briere I think would be worse. Considering if we can get to the playoffs, Briere will definitely be key to the team winning.

SolidSnakeUS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-28-2011, 12:22 AM
  #14
Sawdalite
AbleWasIEreISawLupul
 
Sawdalite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Girouxsalem
Posts: 5,341
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coutsiephan View Post
Too much of an eyesore explanation

This is what it comes down to....


Holmgren is stupid.....

"eyesore explanation"?

I hope you are speaking of my sticky keyboard keys, Kind Sir................

Sawdalite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-28-2011, 12:57 AM
  #15
Kimota
Nation of Poutine
 
Kimota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: La Vieille Capitale
Country: France
Posts: 21,654
vCash: 500
I think Briere could have been considered but I think what I would have done is move only Carter, not both Carter and Richards. That way you keep a great player in Richards but since Carter is his friend, it sends him a message, it's over with the country club and if you don't shape up, you're next. And just remove the C on his jersey.

Kimota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-28-2011, 01:07 AM
  #16
Sawdalite
AbleWasIEreISawLupul
 
Sawdalite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Girouxsalem
Posts: 5,341
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kimota View Post
I think Briere could have been considered but I think what I would have done is move only Carter, not both Carter and Richards. That way you keep a great player in Richards but since Carter is his friend, it sends him a message, it's over with the country club and if you don't shape up, you're next. And just remove the C on his jersey.
Moving him at a later point might not have been possible if his NTC would kick in... And removing his 'C' could lose him forever, which would be disastrous if he was lost and unhappy and had a NTC... He would then have the Flyers over a barrel IMO.

Sawdalite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-28-2011, 02:14 AM
  #17
dats81
Registered User
 
dats81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Carinthia
Country: Austria
Posts: 2,048
vCash: 500
We could as well resume discussing why we should have kept Brind'Amour instead of acquiring Primeau, or that Foppa could have been better than Lindros...


dats81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-28-2011, 06:38 AM
  #18
FlyersFan61290
Registered User
 
FlyersFan61290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 8,436
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sawdalite View Post
Moving him at a later point might not have been possible if his NTC would kick in... And removing his 'C' could lose him forever, which would be disastrous if he was lost and unhappy and had a NTC... He would then have the Flyers over a barrel IMO.
His NTC doesn't kick in for another yr if I'm not mistaken. I wish we didn't trade Richie but if Schenn turns out it's all good.

Anyway I said this on another thread but I'll say it again. I don't like Briere, I like what's he's done for the team in the playoffs and w/ G and now Couturier but I'm still hopefully that he is moved sooner rather then later.


Last edited by FlyersFan61290: 10-28-2011 at 07:12 AM.
FlyersFan61290 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-28-2011, 06:59 AM
  #19
DrinkFightFlyers
Grave Before Shave
 
DrinkFightFlyers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 12,260
vCash: 155
Send a message via AIM to DrinkFightFlyers
They should have signed Vokoun for $100.

DrinkFightFlyers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-28-2011, 07:13 AM
  #20
TOCxNJ
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Jersey Shore
Country: United States
Posts: 1,523
vCash: 500
Briere, in my opinion, is almost always one of the best players on the ice. Obviously his defensive play is questionable but so are many other offensively gifted players.

Personally I'm extremely happy it was Carter/Richards and not Briere. Not that I wanted them to go necessarily.

TOCxNJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-28-2011, 07:15 AM
  #21
JVR21
G
 
JVR21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 7,856
vCash: 500
Because Couts would have no place to live

JVR21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-28-2011, 08:19 AM
  #22
RJ8812
Gunner Stahl #9
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sudbury
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,369
vCash: 769
Because Briere scored more points in the SCF 2 years ago than Carter has scored in his entire playoff career

RJ8812 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-28-2011, 08:32 AM
  #23
BringBackStevens
Registered User
 
BringBackStevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 12,013
vCash: 500
Because Briere is massively overrated by pretty much everyone in philadelphia, whether it be the fans or the management.

You remember the huge goals and the pretty plays but forget the chronic defensive issues with much more ease.

His defensive woes are so bad that even when he tries to play defense and gets in the right position, he's so ineffective that he might as well just be cherry picking. He would be more useful that way with how awful he is at doing anything remotely useful in his own end

BringBackStevens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-28-2011, 08:57 AM
  #24
Crescent Street
Saturday Nite Hockey
 
Crescent Street's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Island
Posts: 2,444
vCash: 500
I'm just going to go ahead and assume the OP doesn't watch the playoffs year after year. Trade Briere? Yeah, ok. Stupidest thing I've read in a week.

Crescent Street is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-28-2011, 09:01 AM
  #25
metalan2
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 5,154
vCash: 500
I've said it since the trades happened...

The Carter trade was great, the Richards trade was beyond retarded. I still can't even believe it. The Flyers could have their same team they have now, but with Richards added to the lineup. That is legitimate contender right there. Just makes ZERO sense to trade Richards for that return, ZERO.

metalan2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.