Not really, but congrats to them anyway. Thankfully for me I like Hockey much more than Baseball, though still a Braves fan, so I'll forget about all this until the summer comes.
I think this Dr needs to be sent back to for some remedial math classes LOL... I was drinking this at work and was like, I know I'm tired at 3 am, but that doesn't look right LOL
I think this Dr needs to be sent back to for some remedial math classes LOL... I was drinking this at work and was like, I know I'm tired at 3 am, but that doesn't look right LOL
I bet the serving size is half a bottle and that is what they use (because everyone always drinks half a bottle you know).
EDIT: Never mind I just noticed it says per 8 ounces then 20 ounces in a bottle lol.
I bet the serving size is half a bottle and that is what they use (because everyone always drinks half a bottle you know).
EDIT: Never mind I just noticed it says per 8 ounces then 20 ounces in a bottle lol.
That's what I originally thought too. A quick lesson in algebra for someone who hasn't been in school for over 10 years (but I still have nightmares). Lol.
Would some Canes fans help me out with some stats from 2005-2006?
Well what kind of stats would you like to know? Player? Team? Playoffs?
For starters I can tell you that Eric Staal had a 100 point season (45goals & 55 assists). The team won 52 games that season, and had two separate 9 game winning streaks.
Well what kind of stats would you like to know? Player? Team? Playoffs?
For starters I can tell you that Eric Staal had a 100 point season (45goals & 55 assists). The team won 52 games that season, and had two separate 9 game winning streaks.
Salary cap info and the typical/ideal/general line-up of the team during the season/playoffs.
Salary cap info and the typical/ideal/general line-up of the team during the season/playoffs.
It's for an informal study.
I won't get into the dynamic of the lineup throughout the season, but I will tell you that our Game 7 lineup against Edmonton was as follows (lines might be a little off but I'll try my best to remember):
I sometimes forget how deep that team was in terms of forwards. If everyone is healthy, Matt Cullen probably wouldn't have been in the top 9. That team arguably had 8 or 9 top six forwards.
Last edited by Boom Boom Anton: 10-31-2011 at 07:44 AM.
I won't get into the dynamic of the lineup throughout the season, but I will tell you that our Game 7 lineup against Edmonton was as follows (lines might be a little off but I'll try my best to remember):
Would have Weight changed the line up much with him being healthy?
Only a little... Larose probably would've been a healthy scratch, Ladd moved to the 4th line, and either Weight or Cullen moved to the wing (probably Cullen). At least, that's what I would've done. But still, a Weight over Larose trade is pretty good, so it might've been a pretty big change...
It's tough to tell. In Game 1 of that series, Weight was healthy, but Cole wasn't, so the lineup changed by replacing Cole with Weight. Not too much different there.
Game 2, they ran with 7 defensemen, with LaRose being replaced by Tverdovsky. Tverdovsky only got 2:20 in that game.
Game 3 was the same lineup as Game 1.
Game 4 and 5, Vasicek replaced LaRose.
Game 6, Weight was injured and Cole returned. Vasicek still in place of LaRose.
Game 7, LaRose was back in and Vasicek was a healthy scratch.
That's some pretty crazy forward depth. Which was important, because looking at the defenseman, it doesn't look like you'd get the classic PMD feel from anyone except Hedican.
Good mix of guys, though, that really were peaking in their careers for the most part (the dmen, that is). That's a recipe for a Cup run.