HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The History of Hockey
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

The History of Hockey Relive great moments in hockey history and discuss how the game has changed over time.

Stanley Cup Dynasties

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
11-08-2005, 10:58 PM
  #26
Leaf Lander
Registered User
 
Leaf Lander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: BWO Headquarters
Country: Canada
Posts: 30,694
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Leaf Lander Send a message via MSN to Leaf Lander
Quote:
Originally Posted by cup2006sensrule
Yeah we were so terrible that we drafted Hossa 12th and Havlat 26th. Where do you place in the NHL to get the 26th choice?

Yeah it was Ottawa's fault they they got the worst expansion draft ever. Every other team since 1967 had a better chance to pick players when they joined the league than the Senators did. (and TB)

Didn't the Leafs enjoy a pretty bad run too.... From about say..... 1968-1992.

ahh typical idiot answer from a child sens fan

now go away your team has won nothing

crazed young ottawa fans go away

you do not belong in this thread

__________________
Hockey's Top 1100 Players of All Time ATD Draft!!!

Last edited by Leaf Lander: 11-11-2005 at 12:26 AM.
Leaf Lander is offline  
Old
11-08-2005, 11:02 PM
  #27
1datsyuk3*
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Country: Guinea-Bissau
Posts: 1,937
vCash: 500
Bob Ross is(was) so much cooler than Bob Rouse.......

I like how this thread started out w/ "Detroit buys cups" and later on in the thread no1 really replied to various valid points by wings fans....

for the record, I think Detroit is borderline dynasty....if they won the cup this year i would say yes b/c that decade (95-05) of excellence qualifies them as a dynasty....

1datsyuk3* is offline  
Old
11-10-2005, 03:12 PM
  #28
Birko19
Registered User
 
Birko19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hamilton, Ont
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,796
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by arrbez
Dude, I was kidding. We're talking about BOB ROUSE here.
I liked Bob Rouse, he was a good signing

Birko19 is online now  
Old
11-10-2005, 04:43 PM
  #29
jiggs 10
Registered User
 
jiggs 10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hockeytown, ND
Country: United States
Posts: 3,541
vCash: 500
Detroit has to be considered a "dynasty", simply because they have been one of the 2 best teams in the league since 1990. They won more games in the decade 1990-1999 than any other team. They made the Final 3 times in 5 years (1995, 1997, 1998), winning twice in the decade. They continue to win more games than any other team (see multiple Presidents' Cups), along with another Cup in 2002.

New Jersey has been a very good team for some years, but don't forget after they won the Cup in 1995, they slacked off and didn't even make the playoffs the next season. And they haven't won the Cup in 4 years now, so "dynasty"? I don't believe so.

jiggs 10 is offline  
Old
11-10-2005, 08:02 PM
  #30
Sens Rule
Registered User
 
Sens Rule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 22,331
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leaf Lander
ahh typical idiot answer from a child sens fan

now go away your team has won nothing
Wow the pot calling the kettle black. Unless you are 45 years old you can't remember the Leafs winning anything.

Sens Rule is online now  
Old
11-11-2005, 08:40 AM
  #31
McGuillicuddy
Registered User
 
McGuillicuddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,077
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by arrbez
Dude, I was kidding. We're talking about BOB ROUSE here.
Hahaha! We need a :headbangingagainstwall: smiley for times like these .

McGuillicuddy is offline  
Old
11-11-2005, 12:32 PM
  #32
Roke
Registered User
 
Roke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,900
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jiggs 10
Detroit has to be considered a "dynasty", simply because they have been one of the 2 best teams in the league since 1990. They won more games in the decade 1990-1999 than any other team. They made the Final 3 times in 5 years (1995, 1997, 1998), winning twice in the decade. They continue to win more games than any other team (see multiple Presidents' Cups), along with another Cup in 2002.

New Jersey has been a very good team for some years, but don't forget after they won the Cup in 1995, they slacked off and didn't even make the playoffs the next season. And they haven't won the Cup in 4 years now, so "dynasty"? I don't believe so.
I have to disagree but that's probably because my view of a Dynasty would be at least 3 cups in a row... which would mean Edmonton wouldn't be considered a dynasty under my narrow definition so it probably isn't all that accurate.

I don't think you can't say a team is domimant unless they're winning Cups. Could Ottawa in the past 3 years be considered a Dynasty? Sure, they've been domimant, during the season, but no Cups and that is how you decide whtehr or not they are a dynasty.

Roke is offline  
Old
11-11-2005, 02:50 PM
  #33
nik jr
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Country: Congo-Kinshasa
Posts: 10,798
vCash: 500
DRW may not technically be a dynasty, but their accomplishments are probably better than many dynasties. b/c it's harder today than it was 50 or 60 yrs ago. i think the cover of the sporting news in 98 once had holmstrom scoring against kolzig in the finals, w/ the headline DYNASTY!

nik jr is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2017 All Rights Reserved.