Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The History of Hockey
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
The History of Hockey Relive great moments in hockey history and discuss how the game has changed over time.

80s divisions

Thread Tools
12-11-2011, 02:36 PM
saskriders's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,605
vCash: 750
80s divisions

So I read an article where the author was excited about realignment because he thought it would be good to see the different styles of hockey played in each division again. I was not alive in the 80's so I am not really aware of what these styles were, and was wondering if someone could describe them

saskriders is offline   Reply With Quote
12-11-2011, 02:42 PM
Johnny Engine
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,654
vCash: 500
Well, the Norris Division was kind of a circus for a while. Mostly poor teams and a lot of Probert, McCrae, Grimson and others running amuck.

Johnny Engine is offline   Reply With Quote
12-11-2011, 03:39 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 114
vCash: 500
Been awhile since we've seen them play, and some may disagree, but here is what I remember:

Smythe: Run n' gun Western shootouts. Mainly because it was the Oilers division, so to win it, you have to be better at scoring than the Oilers. Made for some entertaining games.

Norris: Ah, the poor old Snorris division. Due to general ineptitude and mismanagement, it was easily the worst division in hockey. Worse than the Southleast. For fun, take a look at the list of worst teams to ever make the playoffs. Most of them played in the Norris. I remember the Leafs making it in with 57 points one year. Only because Minnesota was worse. Style included alot of nuclear deterrents on each time, and a regular line brawl in division games. And crappy goaltending.

Adams: It was home to some of the smallest arenas in hockey at the time. The Aud in Buffalo, the old Boston Gardens. I think Hartford's ice was a bit smallish too. Made for tight division. Strong defensive games from everyone in the division. If a team was having trouble playing two ways one year, they got left in the dust. That and Habs vs. Nords, Bruins vs. Sabres, Bruins vs. Whalers, Habs vs. Sabres...some real blood fueds.

Patrick: An argument could be made that it was the best division in hockey. Islanders, Flyers, Capitals, sometimes the Penguins, usually the Rangers. Only real patsy in the division was the Devils. Real good hockey and some real long standing grudges. The Patrick teams could play both ways. Some real scoring stars and some real good defences.

JoeMalone is offline   Reply With Quote
12-12-2011, 10:23 AM
Registered User
JaymzB's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto
Country: Lord Howe Island
Posts: 2,605
vCash: 500
Repeating a lot of what was said above:

Smythe: All-Out offense, as the teams tried to keep up with the Oilers (and failed). The Flames and occasionally the Jets would somewhat challenge the Oilers, while the Kings and ‘Nucks were generally pathetic.

Norris: ...God, easily the worst division in the league. Hard to argue that any team from the division would have been top-10 in the league in most seasons. The Hawks had their moments (Savard was a joy to watch), but that’s pretty much it. Generally speaking, the teams were all terrible. As an example, between 81/82 and 88/89, only 1 season saw 3 teams with a .500 or above record, while 86-87 saw NO teams finishing at or above .500. And teams played the other teams in their division 8 times!

Adams: As said above, the was the tightest division for defensive play in the league. The Whale were pretty bad to start the decade, but the Habs, Bruins, Nords and Sabres were all very solid teams. By the end of the decade, the Nords were a joke of a franchise, but the Whale did pick up some of that slack. Put it this way, in the crazy, high scoring 80’s, you could compete in this division without a plethora of PPG players.

Patrick: Best division in the league. Always had at least 4, sometimes even 6 good/great teams. Obviously the Isles and Flyers were a class above, while the Caps would be 3rd, and the Rangers next. The Pens once they got Lemieux were unfortunate to be stuck where they were (put them in the Norris, and they probably win the division crown from 86 on). The Devils until the end of the decade were a joke, or if you like, a Mickey Mouse franchise, but again, they played half their schedule against other Patrick Division foes. Put them in the Norris? Probably make the playoffs a few times.

JaymzB is offline   Reply With Quote

Forum Jump


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2015 All Rights Reserved.