HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Los Angeles Kings
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

NHLPA Blocks reallignment

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-06-2012, 07:58 PM
  #1
Jason Lewis
Hockey's Future Staff
 
Jason Lewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 5,049
vCash: 500
NHLPA Blocks reallignment

The ****?

http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=610343



Firing the first shot before this offseason CBA I see NHLPA.....Thought this deserved it's own thread...

Why the hell would they do this? Thoughts?

Jason Lewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 08:01 PM
  #2
Bandit
Registered User
 
Bandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Country: United States
Posts: 5,449
vCash: 500
Well that sucks.

Bandit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 08:04 PM
  #3
Mr Irreverent
Put me in coach!
 
Mr Irreverent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,292
vCash: 500
It's about money. It always is....

Mr Irreverent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 08:06 PM
  #4
FootKnight
This ****ing team
 
FootKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,263
vCash: 500
I see no reason to deny this other than to pump up negotiations for the next CBA. Next lockout ahead, all engines full.

FootKnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 08:07 PM
  #5
Mindcircus
Registered User
 
Mindcircus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Irvine, CA
Country: Taiwan
Posts: 3,034
vCash: 500
What a massive **** block!

Mindcircus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 08:23 PM
  #6
jimmy1100
Registered User
 
jimmy1100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle
Country: United States
Posts: 1,814
vCash: 500
I'm surprised, but not disappointed. I was only ho-hum on the realignment.

jimmy1100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 08:24 PM
  #7
Jason Lewis
Hockey's Future Staff
 
Jason Lewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 5,049
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FootKnight View Post
I see no reason to deny this other than to pump up negotiations for the next CBA. Next lockout ahead, all engines full.
Right? They really don't have any logical reason to block this other then to flip the NHL Board the bird and say, "See neener neener what you gunna do about it?"

Jason Lewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 08:25 PM
  #8
Ziggy Stardust
Master Debater
 
Ziggy Stardust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 31,223
vCash: 500
This doesn't bode well...

Ziggy Stardust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 08:29 PM
  #9
Jason Lewis
Hockey's Future Staff
 
Jason Lewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 5,049
vCash: 500
Just a bunch of ******** posturing by reps. This pisses me off. I fear Baseball and Basketball will be all I have to look forward to next year....

Jason Lewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 08:31 PM
  #10
johnjm22
16,005
 
johnjm22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Barstow, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 8,457
vCash: 500
The realignment was unfair to West Coast teams. I'm glad it's delayed.

johnjm22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 08:39 PM
  #11
Jason Lewis
Hockey's Future Staff
 
Jason Lewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 5,049
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnjm22 View Post
The realignment was unfair to West Coast teams. I'm glad it's delayed.
Elaborate on how you feel it was unfair.



Honestly right now any way you slice the realignment it's going to be unfair to west teams because of how far the teams are spread apart.


Do you have a better solution in mind?

Jason Lewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 08:40 PM
  #12
Sam
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,993
vCash: 500
Meh. I just view this similarly to Bettman not committing to NHL players in the next Olympics. It will eventually happen; they just want to use it a bargaining chip since they know the other side wants it.

Sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 08:40 PM
  #13
KopitarFAN
Reno Sucks!
 
KopitarFAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lost Wages, NV
Country: United States
Posts: 9,426
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnjm22 View Post
The realignment was unfair to West Coast teams. I'm glad it's delayed.
I agree. That said, i'd rather deal with that than another lockout.

KopitarFAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 08:46 PM
  #14
Jason Lewis
Hockey's Future Staff
 
Jason Lewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 5,049
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by KopitarFAN View Post
I agree. That said, i'd rather deal with that than another lockout.
Exactly. Unless the league wants to start putting teams in Las Vegas, Portland, Seattle, Eugene, Sacramento, San Diego, Santa Barbara...

proximity is always going to be something that the East benefits from as opposed to the West. It's just an unavoidable evil of all sports. Baseball, Basketball, and Football don't escape it either.

I am really tired of people talking about travel being unfair to the west. It is what it is. And it is going to be there no matter what.

Jason Lewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 08:59 PM
  #15
Hatter
All about the Bob
 
Hatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ojai, Ca
Country: United States
Posts: 2,814
vCash: 500
Not sure why you think that the current travel isn't unfair to the west or why you'd believe that it has to be that way cuz "it is what it is", Jay. that's seems like a strange line of thinking.

It's strange I didn't read any of the threads on this and didn't do too much research But just in perusing it I thought the main idea was solid from what I understood. Get a fairer travel schedule and allow our fans to see teams once a year, a far cry from this once every 3-4 year **** we have to deal Witt now. The one thing I didn't like, again it must be stated I didn't do my fair share of reading on the realignment, was that EDM and VAN would be in our new conference. And really the only reason that bothered me was because it made the path to the playoffs all the harder.

What am I missing here? Thanks

Hatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 09:03 PM
  #16
Jason Lewis
Hockey's Future Staff
 
Jason Lewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 5,049
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatter View Post
Not sure why you think that the current travel isn't unfair to the west or why you'd believe that it has to be that way cuz "it is what it is", Jay. that's seems like a strange line of thinking.

My line of thinking is that there IS NO way to make travel fair for the west if you are comparing it to the east.

Travel will never be fair, so you just have to lessen the damage best you can.

Jason Lewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 09:11 PM
  #17
Hatter
All about the Bob
 
Hatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ojai, Ca
Country: United States
Posts: 2,814
vCash: 500
Ahhh gotcha. And you think that this realignment would do that, yes?

Hatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 09:15 PM
  #18
Sydor25
LA Kings
 
Sydor25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: North Texas
Country: United States
Posts: 21,828
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Sydor25
http://www.nhlpa.com/news/media-rele...ed-realignment

Sydor25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 09:25 PM
  #19
Holden Caulfield
Moderator
Perennial Skeptic
 
Holden Caulfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,015
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaygokings View Post
Elaborate on how you feel it was unfair.



Honestly right now any way you slice the realignment it's going to be unfair to west teams because of how far the teams are spread apart.


Do you have a better solution in mind?
Because both the Western Conferences had 8 teams and the Eastern nnes had 7?

Much easier to make playoffs in an 7 team Conference versus an 8.

That being said, I am pretty pissed this is being delayed. Mostly since now WPG needs to spend another year in the SE. Garbage. You just needed to add a cross-over rule and you had the best possible conference setup, IMO.

Holden Caulfield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 09:50 PM
  #20
johnjm22
16,005
 
johnjm22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Barstow, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 8,457
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaygokings View Post
Elaborate on how you feel it was unfair.



Honestly right now any way you slice the realignment it's going to be unfair to west teams because of how far the teams are spread apart.


Do you have a better solution in mind?
Why couldn't they have just had two conferences, and split each one into two divisions?

Conference I
Division A
Carolina
Columbus
New Jersey
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
Washington

Division B
Boston
Buffalo
Florida
Montreal
Ottawa
Tampa Bay
Toronto


Conference II
Division C
Chicago
Dallas
Detroit
Minnesota
Nashville
St. Louis
Winnipeg

Division D
Anaheim
Calgary
Colorado
Edmonton
Los Angeles
Phoenix
San Jose
Vancouver


15 teams per conference. Winner of each division gets an automatic playoff berth. Spots 3-8 are determined by record. This would be much more fair because the top 8 teams from both conferences make the playoffs.

johnjm22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 10:20 PM
  #21
KopitarFAN
Reno Sucks!
 
KopitarFAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lost Wages, NV
Country: United States
Posts: 9,426
vCash: 500
^ that.

KopitarFAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 10:28 PM
  #22
KingsFan7824
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,928
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnjm22 View Post
Why couldn't they have just had two conferences, and split each one into two divisions?

Conference I
Division A
Carolina
Columbus
New Jersey
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
Washington

Division B
Boston
Buffalo
Florida
Montreal
Ottawa
Tampa Bay
Toronto


Conference II
Division C
Chicago
Dallas
Detroit
Minnesota
Nashville
St. Louis
Winnipeg

Division D
Anaheim
Calgary
Colorado
Edmonton
Los Angeles
Phoenix
San Jose
Vancouver


15 teams per conference. Winner of each division gets an automatic playoff berth. Spots 3-8 are determined by record. This would be much more fair because the top 8 teams from both conferences make the playoffs.
Because Detroit would not want to be the only eastern time zone team in the western conference. They don't like having to go to the west coast so much during the regular season, plus maybe playing 3 playoff series against 3 west coast teams. The teams in the central time zone aren't big fans of playing in the pacific time zone so much either.

KingsFan7824 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 10:58 PM
  #23
johnjm22
16,005
 
johnjm22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Barstow, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 8,457
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingsFan7824 View Post
Because Detroit would not want to be the only eastern time zone team in the western conference. They don't like having to go to the west coast so much during the regular season, plus maybe playing 3 playoff series against 3 west coast teams. The teams in the central time zone aren't big fans of playing in the pacific time zone so much either.
The league's current proposal for Detriot's conference/division isn't really any different than mine.

League's current Proposal:
Chicago
Columbus
Dallas
Detroit
Minnesota
Nashville
St. Louis
Winnipeg

johnjm22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 11:10 PM
  #24
KINGS17
Smartest in the Room
 
KINGS17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 15,552
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam View Post
Meh. I just view this similarly to Bettman not committing to NHL players in the next Olympics. It will eventually happen; they just want to use it a bargaining chip since they know the other side wants it.
Pretty much, but I would advise the NHLPA against crossing swords with Bettman again. I think they will lose, again.

KINGS17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2012, 11:17 PM
  #25
ScoreZeGoals
Back on Cloud 9
 
ScoreZeGoals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 10,245
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnjm22 View Post
Why couldn't they have just had two conferences, and split each one into two divisions?

Conference I
Division A
Carolina
Columbus
New Jersey
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
Washington

Division B
Boston
Buffalo
Florida
Montreal
Ottawa
Tampa Bay
Toronto


Conference II
Division C
Chicago
Dallas
Detroit
Minnesota
Nashville
St. Louis
Winnipeg

Division D
Anaheim
Calgary
Colorado
Edmonton
Los Angeles
Phoenix
San Jose
Vancouver


15 teams per conference. Winner of each division gets an automatic playoff berth. Spots 3-8 are determined by record. This would be much more fair because the top 8 teams from both conferences make the playoffs.
^ This. I really don't understand why this became so difficult. It's like the league used a shotgun to kill a fly. The proposed playoff format was a complete joke

ScoreZeGoals is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.