If this one is agreed by both GMs, I don't see a major problem with it.
I wouldn't make the trade myself, but it doesn't give either GM a significant advantage or disadvantage.
I just don't see it as being much better than the original trade, but I guess "just a tiny bit better" is sometimes good enough to push things from unacceptable to acceptable.
I just don't see it as being much better than the original trade, but I guess "just a tiny bit better" is sometimes good enough to push things from unacceptable to acceptable.
If that is the resulting trade, I feel the trade committee has done it's job in this case. All trades have a winner and loser, but as long as we can eliminate the trades that distort the balance of the draft, I think that's what we should focus on.
I think the changes made, assuming they are agreed upon by the GMs involved, are enough as well.
(having said that, if we can get them to remove the 151 and 134 part, it would be more fair)
I just resent the fact I presented not one two but two re-worked trades, and I had GMs not even on the trade committee trying to brow-beat me into a lesser deal. Add in the fact that one such GM immediately tried to use that as leverage in a trade via PM and you can understand why I'm not pleased.
#23, #170 for #59, #70. I don't like it, but it's what the majority has deemed adequate and I guess I have to go along with that.
We didn't officially reject your 2nd try - it was in discussion. I think we can all agree that if you want to go through this one, it will be accepted no problem.
I still think you made a really good deal for yourself. 3 Top 70 picks is a great way to start a team.
I just resent the fact I presented not one two but two re-worked trades, and I had GMs not even on the trade committee trying to brow-beat me into a lesser deal. Add in the fact that one such GM immediately tried to use that as leverage in a trade via PM and you can understand why I'm not pleased.
I just resent the fact I presented not one two but two re-worked trades, and I had GMs not even on the trade committee trying to brow-beat me into a lesser deal. Add in the fact that one such GM immediately tried to use that as leverage in a trade via PM and you can understand why I'm not pleased.
I have asked if people had any problem with me giving my opinion on the proposal, and no one wrote any complains. Sorry if it's at the detriment of your own team, but I don't look at the team involve before making my comment. After 8 complete drafts, I think I'm in a situation to give a fair hindsight as to the value of a pick and shouldn't feel embarrass to give my opinion. Too bad this time it goes against you, but you should know it's nothing personal. Actually, you would be surprise to learn that Papershoe is in my own division.
