i wish he wouldve worked out better on the PK, probably could get a few SH goals off of him.
my feelings on mitchell are very mixed. sometimes he lights it up, and others he stinks it up. not a lot of middle ground with him. I think our entire bottom six minus mcginn/handzus lack a lot of the soft hands you need to keep pressure in the O-Zone.
murray is just an older version of mcarthy/wingles who doesnt produce as much as them with twice as many games.
do i hold on to a 30 year olds contract who has most likely reached his ceiling and take away ice time from my prospects or off load the contract and keep cycling vandemeer into the fourth line when needed?
wish we could get more concrete insight into the decision, but whatever. still waiting for an actual trade to happen.
If what you say is true then why didn't it work out that way? I'm not just talking about the todds decision which was a direct result of Murrays performance.
No clue. Why was White being played instead of Vandermeer early this season? Why did they decide to use Huskins and Wallin against Vancouver instead of Braun? Why did they even bother signing/playing Lemieux?
Well, i'm sure we'll see him in the playoffs. A vet. player over a rookie is is a good roster decision for the 4th line. We have several forwards that can play in the NHL in the 4th line. Good chance to see what they can do...
seems like most of you has a secret man-crush on Murray..
by the way what the hell is TOM?
The Other Murray
Thereís a lot of things wrong with this country, but one of the few things still right with it is that a man can steer clear of the organized ******** if he really wants to. Itís a goddamned luxury, and if I were you, Iíd take advantage of it while you can.
-- Dr. Hunter S. Thompson