HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Central Division > Dallas Stars
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

In Search of General Stars Talk

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-15-2012, 12:55 PM
  #26
Bennrocks
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,078
vCash: 500
Apparently joe has had talks with howson... if we give up our first im gonna rage

Bennrocks is offline  
Old
02-15-2012, 12:57 PM
  #27
Stars99Lobo37
Moderator
Away Games - 13
 
Stars99Lobo37's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sec 314 - Richardson
Country: United States
Posts: 48,204
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bennrocks View Post
Apparently joe has had talks with howson... if we give up our first im gonna rage
That would go against everything GMJN has talked about in his first couple of seasons as general manager.

If Army was still GM, then yea, I could see it possibly happening but not with Joe.

__________________
"Now when people ask me where I'm from, I tell them Texas. Dallas, Texas." - Mike Modano, March 8th, 2014

Bossier-Shreveport Mudbugs - 1997 to 2011 - WPHL Champions 1998, 1999, 2000 - CHL Champions 2011
Stars99Lobo37 is online now  
Old
02-15-2012, 01:16 PM
  #28
MetalGodAOD
Moderator
Star Rangers
 
MetalGodAOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New York City
Country: United States
Posts: 12,136
vCash: 500
No way iin hell we give up our 1st. I'm guessing something around Brassard or Vermette for one of our D.

MetalGodAOD is online now  
Old
02-15-2012, 01:17 PM
  #29
Bennrocks
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,078
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnholyPrince View Post
No way iin hell we give up our 1st. I'm guessing something around Brassard or Vermette for one of our D.
probably

Bennrocks is offline  
Old
02-15-2012, 01:18 PM
  #30
Ambassador Of Fun
Registered User
 
Ambassador Of Fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,674
vCash: 500
Carter for Besko/Bachman/Campbell + Glennie + Vincour + 2nd/Smith/Smith/Chaisson

Ambassador Of Fun is offline  
Old
02-15-2012, 01:19 PM
  #31
Dallasman
Registered User
 
Dallasman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Country: Ukraine
Posts: 1,644
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnholyPrince View Post
No way iin hell we give up our 1st. I'm guessing something around Brassard or Vermette for one of our D.
This is my thinking too

Dallasman is offline  
Old
02-15-2012, 01:23 PM
  #32
Bennrocks
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,078
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambassador Of Fun View Post
Carter for Besko/Bachman/Campbell + Glennie + Vincour + 2nd/Smith/Smith/Chaisson
i'd do it preferably bachs but i would totally be willing to sell campbell off for carter

Bennrocks is offline  
Old
02-15-2012, 01:24 PM
  #33
Frozen Failure
Best Threadkiller
 
Frozen Failure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,510
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Frozen Failure Send a message via Yahoo to Frozen Failure
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bennrocks View Post
Apparently joe has had talks with howson... if we give up our first im gonna rage
I told myself I was going to see how long it would take me before I posted in this thread, but god dammit you make it hard guys.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambassador Of Fun View Post
Carter for Besko/Bachman/Campbell + Glennie + Vincour + 2nd/Smith/Smith/Chaisson
Hell no AoF, hell no.

I would rather Joe make a play for Nash than Carter, but if we give up a first and some futures for Nash or Carter, I will be very very disappointed in management and will probably go join a different fanbase. I hear the Panthers need more fans and might actually make the playoffs too! Brassard or Vermette, as UP just mentioned, would be the most logical decision, because we need to increase our long term depth rather than shell out huge for a single top end talent. You don't succeed in the "new NHL" by doing that. (Before you say, but look at the Rangers! They drafted the only thing keeping them at the top, plus most of their depth and futures like Staal and MDZ, and didn't trade for Gaborik or Richards)

We have a relatively loaded prospect pool right now. Even with all the misgivings towards Glennie, Oleksiak and Campbell, we're in good shape with high reward picks. Our future winger depth is excellent with Chiasson, Smith, Smith, Smith, and Smith (this is a joke, we only have two Smiths) and our defense depth looks very promising with Larsen, Nemeth, Oleksiak, etc. Some of these guys have had tons of time to develop and deserve a chance in the NHL. We've been riding veterans so hard these past few years, and we've let a lot of serviceable talent walk or be wasted.

So, Joe, if you ever read this, please don't let me be misunderstood, make the right move and stay out of this Nash or Carter mess no matter what. It's over for our old guard, and the depth you picked up can't right this ship anymore.

Bring on The Scott Glennie.

Frozen Failure is offline  
Old
02-15-2012, 01:34 PM
  #34
Ambassador Of Fun
Registered User
 
Ambassador Of Fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,674
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frozen Failure View Post
I told myself I was going to see how long it would take me before I posted in this thread, but god dammit you make it hard guys.



Hell no AoF, hell no.

I would rather Joe make a play for Nash than Carter, but if we give up a first and some futures for Nash or Carter, I will be very very disappointed in management and will probably go join a different fanbase. I hear the Panthers need more fans and might actually make the playoffs too! Brassard or Vermette, as UP just mentioned, would be the most logical decision, because we need to increase our long term depth rather than shell out huge for a single top end talent. You don't succeed in the "new NHL" by doing that. (Before you say, but look at the Rangers! They drafted the only thing keeping them at the top, plus most of their depth and futures like Staal and MDZ, and didn't trade for Gaborik or Richards)

We have a relatively loaded prospect pool right now. Even with all the misgivings towards Glennie, Oleksiak and Campbell, we're in good shape with high reward picks. Our future winger depth is excellent with Chiasson, Smith, Smith, Smith, and Smith (this is a joke, we only have two Smiths) and our defense depth looks very promising with Larsen, Nemeth, Oleksiak, etc. Some of these guys have had tons of time to develop and deserve a chance in the NHL. We've been riding veterans so hard these past few years, and we've let a lot of serviceable talent walk or be wasted.

So, Joe, if you ever read this, please don't let me be misunderstood, make the right move and stay out of this Nash or Carter mess no matter what. It's over for our old guard, and the depth you picked up can't right this ship anymore.

Bring on The Scott Glennie.
We have a goalie prospect to spare (one of which has disappointed after having a lot of hype), another 1st round bust who has a little value still, a guy who has shown glimpses of being maybe a 2nd liner in this league but more than likely will be a 3rd/4th liner, and a crap shoot of a forward prospect for a legit 40 goal scorer. It's a whole lot of not much to give up for a very good player.

Ambassador Of Fun is offline  
Old
02-15-2012, 01:44 PM
  #35
Frozen Failure
Best Threadkiller
 
Frozen Failure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,510
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Frozen Failure Send a message via Yahoo to Frozen Failure
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambassador Of Fun View Post
We have a goalie prospect to spare (one of which has disappointed after having a lot of hype), another 1st round bust who has a little value still, a guy who has shown glimpses of being maybe a 2nd liner in this league but more than likely will be a 3rd/4th liner, and a crap shoot of a forward prospect for a legit 40 goal scorer. It's a whole lot of not much to give up for a very good player.
Doesn't matter. These are guys who haven't had a chance in a pro league yet to show their mettle. I'd rather eat the growing pains of guys like Vincour and Glennie and Chiasson and Campbell than take the easy and possibly horrific path of trading for another superstar who hasn't made the playoffs and seemed content with his lot the past few years.

Frozen Failure is offline  
Old
02-15-2012, 01:53 PM
  #36
Ambassador Of Fun
Registered User
 
Ambassador Of Fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,674
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frozen Failure View Post
Doesn't matter. These are guys who haven't had a chance in a pro league yet to show their mettle. I'd rather eat the growing pains of guys like Vincour and Glennie and Chiasson and Campbell than take the easy and possibly horrific path of trading for another superstar who hasn't made the playoffs and seemed content with his lot the past few years.
Carter has played in about 50 playoff games. He hasn't produced as well as the regular season, but that last sentence doesn't apply to him.

Ambassador Of Fun is offline  
Old
02-15-2012, 01:58 PM
  #37
Bennrocks
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,078
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frozen Failure View Post
Doesn't matter. These are guys who haven't had a chance in a pro league yet to show their mettle. I'd rather eat the growing pains of guys like Vincour and Glennie and Chiasson and Campbell than take the easy and possibly horrific path of trading for another superstar who hasn't made the playoffs and seemed content with his lot the past few years.
if carter is available for the right price you have to make that trade he's the same age as loui isn't he? He scores a **** ton of goals and we're gonna need some one to replace ribs in the coming years, im not advocating going out and getting in a bidding war with some other teams to get him but if the right deal comes along you have to do it.

Before throwing campbell overboard i would like to see him in pro hockey however so i would rather not move him

Bennrocks is offline  
Old
02-15-2012, 02:03 PM
  #38
joelnmich
Registered User
 
joelnmich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 140
vCash: 500
I hope Dallas holds on to Campbell also. I want to hear Rayzor say stuff like "No Soup for You!" and "Campbell ladles it out to Larsen" and "Bloated rebound like the morning after lentil soup".

joelnmich is offline  
Old
02-15-2012, 02:05 PM
  #39
Chaos
3, 2, 1
 
Chaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Country: United States
Posts: 7,779
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Chaos
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frozen Failure View Post
Doesn't matter. These are guys who haven't had a chance in a pro league yet to show their mettle. I'd rather eat the growing pains of guys like Vincour and Glennie and Chiasson and Campbell than take the easy and possibly horrific path of trading for another superstar who hasn't made the playoffs and seemed content with his lot the past few years.
If you can get Carter for something like Campbell, Glennie, Vincour, and a 2nd, you make that trade in an instant.

We'd be adding a guy the same age as Eriksson, who has been good for about 30 goals a year for 4 years in a row(until this year), and he's only got a $5.2 million cap hit. He's the exact kind of guy Niuewendyk has talked about acquiring, someone who can help th team now, but will still be with us for years to come.

__________________
Chaos is always right.

-Vagrant
Chaos is offline  
Old
02-15-2012, 02:05 PM
  #40
Frozen Failure
Best Threadkiller
 
Frozen Failure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,510
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Frozen Failure Send a message via Yahoo to Frozen Failure
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bennrocks View Post
if carter is available for the right price you have to make that trade he's the same age as loui isn't he? He scores a **** ton of goals and we're gonna need some one to replace ribs in the coming years, im not advocating going out and getting in a bidding war with some other teams to get him but if the right deal comes along you have to do it.

Before throwing campbell overboard i would like to see him in pro hockey however so i would rather not move him
The price for Nash or Carter would be out of our price range unless we're moving Ribeiro.

Frozen Failure is offline  
Old
02-15-2012, 02:08 PM
  #41
Bennrocks
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,078
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frozen Failure View Post
The price for Nash or Carter would be out of our price range unless we're moving Ribeiro.
I don't think we can say that until the deal goes down. Richards was had for a reasonable price. We have no ****ing clue what howson is going to do and how much other GM's are going to lowball him

Bennrocks is offline  
Old
02-15-2012, 02:40 PM
  #42
Sony Eriksson*
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: N. Dallas/NYC
Country: Faroe Islands
Posts: 13,583
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaos View Post
If you can get Carter for something like Campbell, Glennie, Vincour, and a 2nd, you make that trade in an instant.

We'd be adding a guy the same age as Eriksson, who has been good for about 30 goals a year for 4 years in a row(until this year), and he's only got a $5.2 million cap hit. He's the exact kind of guy Niuewendyk has talked about acquiring, someone who can help th team now, but will still be with us for years to come.
Why do all this for Carter who has scored "30 goals the last 4 years" and not give up a 1st, roster player and a prospect for Nash who has averaged 30+ goals since he came into the league?

Sony Eriksson* is offline  
Old
02-15-2012, 02:43 PM
  #43
Chaos
3, 2, 1
 
Chaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Country: United States
Posts: 7,779
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Chaos
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sony Eriksson View Post
Why do all this for Carter who has scored "30 goals the last 4 years" and not give up a 1st, roster player and a prospect for Nash who has averaged 30+ goals since he came into the league?
Because I'm pretty sure Nash would take quite a bit more in a trade, and he carries a $2.6 million higher cap hit, for similar recent production. IMO Carter is the smarter guy to go after

Chaos is offline  
Old
02-15-2012, 03:07 PM
  #44
MetalGodAOD
Moderator
Star Rangers
 
MetalGodAOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New York City
Country: United States
Posts: 12,136
vCash: 500
And Carter's a Center.

MetalGodAOD is online now  
Old
02-15-2012, 03:27 PM
  #45
Cin
Eurosnob.
 
Cin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Country: Thailand
Posts: 7,471
vCash: 500
The problem with getting either Carter or Nash is that we'd have too many goal scorers. We NEED players like Ribeiro and well Ribeiro. We don't have any other play makers... Wow.

Hemsky, even though he is older and injury prone is what we'd need if we decide to buy. Playmaker.

Also Lol to the Campbell Soup references.

Cin is offline  
Old
02-15-2012, 03:49 PM
  #46
MetalGodAOD
Moderator
Star Rangers
 
MetalGodAOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New York City
Country: United States
Posts: 12,136
vCash: 500
We need talent more than anything. But I agree I don't want to sell the farm for Carter. But if Joe could trade Campbell Glennie and Nemeth or something I'd do it. That wouldn't be enough though we all know.

MetalGodAOD is online now  
Old
02-15-2012, 03:51 PM
  #47
Bennrocks
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,078
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnholyPrince View Post
We need talent more than anything. But I agree I don't want to sell the farm for Carter. But if Joe could trade Campbell Glennie and Nemeth or something I'd do it. That wouldn't be enough though we all know.
i dunno... he only cost voracek and a 1st... if they sell carter now its probably going to be less than that

Bennrocks is offline  
Old
02-15-2012, 03:53 PM
  #48
Shady12
12-13 FGotG Champion
 
Shady12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: WesTex
Country: United States
Posts: 2,068
vCash: 500
We'd have too many goal scorers? Lol. Please I desperately want too many goal scorers.

I'd rather have Carter. But only if the plan is for him to play right wing. The deal above is too much. Only cost Columbus Voracek and a first. Probably less now. Maybe Campbell(first round pick) and Vincour(somewhat similar to Voracek).

Shady12 is offline  
Old
02-15-2012, 04:06 PM
  #49
Frozen Failure
Best Threadkiller
 
Frozen Failure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,510
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Frozen Failure Send a message via Yahoo to Frozen Failure
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shady12 View Post
We'd have too many goal scorers? Lol. Please I desperately want too many goal scorers.

I'd rather have Carter. But only if the plan is for him to play right wing. The deal above is too much. Only cost Columbus Voracek and a first. Probably less now. Maybe Campbell(first round pick) and Vincour(somewhat similar to Voracek).
If Huselius hadn't exploded I'd say we need him.

Frozen Failure is offline  
Old
02-15-2012, 04:09 PM
  #50
Bennrocks
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,078
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shady12 View Post
We'd have too many goal scorers? Lol. Please I desperately want too many goal scorers.

I'd rather have Carter. But only if the plan is for him to play right wing. The deal above is too much. Only cost Columbus Voracek and a first. Probably less now. Maybe Campbell(first round pick) and Vincour(somewhat similar to Voracek).
Glennie was the same # pick as the CLB pick and they want defense soooooo

glennie+nemeth for carter

glennie+larsen might be less of a clouds in the head proposal

Bennrocks is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.