HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Cory Sarich, Scott Hannan

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
02-18-2012, 11:27 AM
  #26
Barney Gumble
Registered User
 
Barney Gumble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 16,194
vCash: 50
*** looks at where the Flames currently are in the standings then scratches head as to why they would be unloading roster players for draft picks ***

Barney Gumble is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 12:10 PM
  #27
Mike Jones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,204
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGleninator View Post
Not this again I am done do some research and come back when you know a thing or two about our hockey team.
I have "done research" and the handwriting is on the wall. The core is getting older and only has so many productive games and years left. Check out the roster and do the math (Hint One: It involves averages). It's best to get a rebuild done quickly then let things linger. Do Calgary fans really want to see a group of middle age guys floundering around at the bottom of the league before something sensible happens?

Mike Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 12:40 PM
  #28
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,611
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Jones View Post
I have "done research" and the handwriting is on the wall. The core is getting older and only has so many productive games and years left. Check out the roster and do the math (Hint One: It involves averages). It's best to get a rebuild done quickly then let things linger. Do Calgary fans really want to see a group of middle age guys floundering around at the bottom of the league before something sensible happens?
Hint they have more rookies playing right now than any other team all are holding their own.

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 12:46 PM
  #29
Mike Jones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,204
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGleninator View Post
Hint they have more rookies playing right now than any other team all are holding their own.
"Holding their own" (I agree with the statement) is not the same as "thriving" and helping the team win big. There are lots of young players in the AHL who could go to the show and hang on by their finger nails and good for them. There is a long distance, however, between survival and winning when it comes to life in the NHL.

Mike Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 12:50 PM
  #30
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,611
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Jones View Post
"Holding their own" (I agree with the statement) is not the same as "thriving" and helping the team win big. There are lots of young players in the AHL who could go to the show and hang on by their finger nails and good for them. There is a long distance, however, between survival and winning when it comes to life in the NHL.
So what do you purpose the edmonton way? In one year Feaster has made the average age of the team 2 years younger by redoing almost half the roster and every single player is younger that was brought in.

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 01:16 PM
  #31
Medium Rare*
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,065
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barney Gumble View Post
*** looks at where the Flames currently are in the standings then scratches head as to why they would be unloading roster players for draft picks ***
I don't get it either. The Flames are missing 6 of their regulars (including 3 guys who have played considerable time in their top 6) to injury and are still tied for 2nd in the west in points in their last 10 games.

I can see the Flames actually picking up a depth forward rather than selling anyone

Medium Rare* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 12:41 AM
  #32
Hawkguy
Moderator
Archer-Hero-Avenger
 
Hawkguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 37,466
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGleninator View Post
Hint they have more rookies playing right now than any other team all are holding their own.
How many rookies do you have? Montreal has like 4, I think.

Plus a bunch of guys who played less than a full season before this one.

Hawkguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 12:46 AM
  #33
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,611
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by natey2k4 View Post
How many rookies do you have? Montreal has like 4, I think.

Plus a bunch of guys who played less than a full season before this one.
at this moment 6 rookies on the roster.

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 12:55 AM
  #34
Silvesta
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 136
vCash: 500
One name circling around is Jeff Carter to the Flames, if we don't have to give up a WHOLE lot, I am fine with it, other than that pick up a center that can play top minutes and can play bottom 6, like a Malholtra type player. We won't need the acquisition for long until maybe Mid March

Silvesta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 01:26 AM
  #35
CaptainCrunch67
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,014
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silvesta View Post
One name circling around is Jeff Carter to the Flames, if we don't have to give up a WHOLE lot, I am fine with it, other than that pick up a center that can play top minutes and can play bottom 6, like a Malholtra type player. We won't need the acquisition for long until maybe Mid March
Right now with some of the other players in the mix, your going to have to give up more then Carter is worth, and Howson needs a big win when he trades Carter or Nash to keep his job, he just can't ask for picks and prospects to kick off another rebuild. I doubt that fans would flock out to the games to watch another 3 or 4 years of painful hockey.

I wouldn't mind Carter but the price is going involve a 1st and someone like Bartchi plus plus. Not worth the price.

CaptainCrunch67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 01:28 AM
  #36
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,611
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch67 View Post
Right now with some of the other players in the mix, your going to have to give up more then Carter is worth, and Howson needs a big win when he trades Carter or Nash to keep his job, he just can't ask for picks and prospects to kick off another rebuild. I doubt that fans would flock out to the games to watch another 3 or 4 years of painful hockey.

I wouldn't mind Carter but the price is going involve a 1st and someone like Bartchi plus plus. Not worth the price.
I wouldn't do Sven straight up and I don't think Sutter would either. Sven has the potential to be a great player not that Carter isn't but this year Carter has looked disinterested and I don't want that Carter on my team.

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 01:35 AM
  #37
Noori
Moderator
 
Noori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,973
vCash: 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silvesta View Post
One name circling around is Jeff Carter to the Flames, if we don't have to give up a WHOLE lot, I am fine with it, other than that pick up a center that can play top minutes and can play bottom 6, like a Malholtra type player. We won't need the acquisition for long until maybe Mid March
With Cammalleri's successful conversion to center, the need to go out and acquire Carter just become quite a bit less pressing. A one two punch of Jokinen and Cammalleri looks pretty solid to me.

We already have the right pieces top-6 wingers (Glencross, Stempniak) and bottom six centers (Jones, Backlund, Moss), we just have to wait until the first week of March to get bodies back.

If we're not seller's that's one thing, but I hope we don't go out and overspend on players we don't need.

Noori is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 03:24 AM
  #38
torque
...
 
torque's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,907
vCash: 500
Hannan would be a good depth player for the Canucks. He's also a BC boy, so that's a bonus.
Canucks offer:

VAN
Sulzer (700k - Impending UFA)
3rd Round Pick

CGY
Hannan (1.00m - Impending UFA)

torque is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 04:56 AM
  #39
HighLifeMan
HFB Partner
 
HighLifeMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,879
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by torque View Post
Hannan would be a good depth player for the Canucks. He's also a BC boy, so that's a bonus.
Canucks offer:

VAN
Sulzer (700k - Impending UFA)
3rd Round Pick

CGY
Hannan (1.00m - Impending UFA)
Not terrible, but not worth it considering Vancouver could be a potential 1st round opponent. ( If we make it )

I think Feaster only moves one of Sarich/Hannan if meant him recouping one of the 2nd round picks we have dealt in the next two seasons.

If not he will likely keep both of them for a playoff push.

HighLifeMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 03:12 PM
  #40
Silvesta
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 136
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noori View Post
With Cammalleri's successful conversion to center, the need to go out and acquire Carter just become quite a bit less pressing. A one two punch of Jokinen and Cammalleri looks pretty solid to me.

We already have the right pieces top-6 wingers (Glencross, Stempniak) and bottom six centers (Jones, Backlund, Moss), we just have to wait until the first week of March to get bodies back.

If we're not seller's that's one thing, but I hope we don't go out and overspend on players we don't need.
Very true, I mean Feaster can at least work his magic, like look at the Stempniak for Langkow trade, I think he will do something but not a major deal.

Silvesta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 03:42 PM
  #41
blankall
Registered User
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,844
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silvesta View Post
Very true, I mean Feaster can at least work his magic, like look at the Stempniak for Langkow trade, I think he will do something but not a major deal.
My guess is Babchuk will be moved for a depth forward or a pick.

blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:27 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.