HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Jack Johnson to Pitt

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-19-2012, 02:59 PM
  #26
Martyros
Registered User
 
Martyros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Holly Hood
Country: Armenia
Posts: 5,448
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sawski21 View Post
a lot of scraps huh...why is Jack Johnson so valuable? explain that to me? he is a career minus player!! how is he worth more than your so called scraps
Because Johnson is worth a top 6 forward. Not a combination of bottom 6 forwards/prospects....a current top 6 forward. In other words, we'd package him with another talent (Bernier/1st round pick/higher-level prospect) to get a top line forward.

Martyros is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 03:05 PM
  #27
kingsofLA
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The Great NW
Country: United States
Posts: 494
vCash: 500
Think of James Neal and his value. That how we value JJ

kingsofLA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 03:06 PM
  #28
The Instigator
Registered User
 
The Instigator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,932
vCash: 900
Jack Johnson would get a hundred points playing with Crosby!!!!!111!1!1!!

The Instigator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 03:47 PM
  #29
eXile59
Shirts on.
 
eXile59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 16,225
vCash: 500
We are having enough trouble getting our over paid Defense to play as is so no thanks.

eXile59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 03:59 PM
  #30
Oroku Saki*
Pete Hearts Volch
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Rocky Point
Country: United States
Posts: 24,130
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FanHabtic View Post
Don't forget Palmeiri, Fayne, 2nd
It's actually Palmieri, Clermont, 2nd. Do some learning.

Oroku Saki* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 05:54 PM
  #31
billybudd
5 Mike Rupps
 
billybudd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 10,157
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Telos View Post
Terrible trading partners. The Pens have spent a lot of time trying to get wingers for their centers, and we have been doing the exact same thing. If we trade someone like Johnson, we wouldn't be looking for defense in return, our depth chart is beyond ridiculous when it comes to defense, we would be looking for someone just like Neal. Which is impossible. We are looking for the deal that the Pens made with Dallas. We've obviously had different successes, but we are very similar teams. We have defense, goaltender, and centers. The problem is capable wingers, and that is all we desire.
Pretty much this. The player the Kings need is a big, north/south winger with a cannon to ride shotgun with Kopitar. Pittsburgh can't spare the only one they have.

Johnson is sort of a teetering between young D with a high ceiling and overpaid underachieving blueliner. Pittsburgh has both types of guys spilling out the ears.

So, basically, this proposal is LA offering Pittsburgh something Pittsburgh doesn't need in the hopes of getting back something LA wouldn't need.

billybudd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 06:38 PM
  #32
mytor4*
 
mytor4*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,175
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sawski21 View Post
what would it take? something based around Tangradi, Kennedy, 3rd rd pick? to much? to little?
This junk won't get you Johnson.
This is a terrible proposal.

mytor4* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 07:26 PM
  #33
Rorschach
Fearful Symmetry
 
Rorschach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Country: United States
Posts: 6,414
vCash: 500
The only thing that these two teams could do would be something around Johnson and Stoll for Staal.

- R

Rorschach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 07:27 PM
  #34
bobafettish*
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,961
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sawski21 View Post
a lot of scraps huh...why is Jack Johnson so valuable? explain that to me? he is a career minus player!! how is he worth more than your so called scraps
why do u want to trade for him.

bobafettish* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 07:31 PM
  #35
CF Punk
Le Magnifique
 
CF Punk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Peterborough, ONT
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,697
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RehnX View Post
Kennedy COULD play top 6, but no, they wouldn't accept that.

If JJ is moved it will be part of the package for Nash.

We don't really need him/couldn't afford him anyway, unless we move Martin. . .
Only on Pittsburgh. That's the problem. He's not good enough. He's a career third liner.

CF Punk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 07:53 PM
  #36
ean
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,802
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rorschach View Post
The only thing that these two teams could do would be something around Johnson and Stoll for Staal.

- R
Done from LA. Have Penner too.

ean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 07:56 PM
  #37
Hockey 4 Life
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 622
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davalicious View Post
Edited version I probably go with...

Ryder, Halak, 2nd
Kadri, MacArthur, 2nd
Raymond, Ballard, 2nd
Kennedy, Tangradi, 2nd
Thats the correct order. LoL at tangradi,Kennedy and a 2nd being ranked 1st.

Hockey 4 Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2012, 10:09 PM
  #38
10 ft. pole
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Colorado
Country: United States
Posts: 1,242
vCash: 500
to PITT: jack johnson

to LA: dan bylsma

10 ft. pole is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.