HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Jon Blum + Nick Spaling + NSH 1st

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-22-2012, 10:19 PM
  #26
Hockey 4 Life
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 687
vCash: 500
To
Nashville
Clark Macarthur
2012 2nd
2013 2nd
Jonas Gustavson
Toronto
Jonathon Blum
Anders Lindback
2012 1st

Hockey 4 Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 10:19 PM
  #27
DeceiverOfTheGods
HFBoards Sponsor
 
DeceiverOfTheGods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,883
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatvianTwist View Post
If I were Nashville, I'd make it a conditional 1st only if he resigns, a 3rd if he doesn't.
The deal wouldn't get done. You have to make it worth Toronto's while to trade Grabo, and Budish and a 3rd doesn't do it. If teams are giving up 1sts for Kyle Quincey, and a 2nd for Dominic Moore, Grabo is definitely worth this deal.

DeceiverOfTheGods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 10:19 PM
  #28
uncleben85
My face is my mask.
 
uncleben85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,654
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gopreds9 View Post
Now here is one I can get behind
Grabo is heart and soul and possibly my fave on the team, but i could get behind that too... maybe

uncleben85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 10:20 PM
  #29
Top 6 Spaling
Registered User
 
Top 6 Spaling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Smashville
Country: United States
Posts: 10,389
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey 4 Life View Post
To
Nashville
Clark Macarthur
2012 2nd
2013 2nd
Jonas Gustavson
Toronto
Jonathon Blum
Anders Lindback
2012 1st
Take a look at some of the other proposals in this thread (like the Ribero one. Or the one that's Grabo for 1st+Budish) and tell me that this is a better deal for Nashville than those.....

We don't need picks, we need help now.

Top 6 Spaling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 10:22 PM
  #30
LyricalLyricist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 21,505
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gopreds9 View Post
Now here is one I can get behind

EDIT: Though i'd rahter make the pick conditional. 1st if he resigns, later round if he doesnt.
then it would have to be 2013.

LyricalLyricist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 10:22 PM
  #31
LatvianTwist
Global Moderator
 
LatvianTwist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston
Country: Tibet
Posts: 18,465
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey 4 Life View Post
To
Nashville
Clark Macarthur
2012 2nd
2013 2nd
Jonas Gustavson
Toronto
Jonathon Blum
Anders Lindback
2012 1st
Please stop. These are so incredibly one-sided it's not even funny.

LatvianTwist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 10:22 PM
  #32
Sonny21
Registerd User
 
Sonny21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,689
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TribalPhoenix View Post
Here was my proposal in another thread that I felt works pretty well, and most agreed.



Mikhail Grabovski



NSH 1st Rounder 2012
Zach Budish


Preds get a cost effective guy who can produce and instantly becomes their first line centre, and plays with heart and soul while putting up solid offence.

Leafs get another 1st, and the kind of prospect that makes Burke drool (huge, offensive upside, hits like a truck, and is American.)
Yeap I think it's a great trade for both teams. I think Grabovski is a great fit too with preds.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey 4 Life View Post
To
Nashville
Grabovski
2012 2nd
Jonas Gustavson
Korbinian holzer
2013 3rd

Toronto
Ryan ellis
Anders lindback
2012 1st
Preds say no way. As one poster mentioned they won't trade they're bluechip prospect for a rental. That trade breaks down to 1st + Lindback for Grabovski and Ellis for 2nd, 3rd, holzner, Gusto which is a big no from them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gopreds9 View Post
Now here is one I can get behind

EDIT: Though i'd rahter make the pick conditional. 1st if he resigns, later round if he doesnt.
No conditional, Grabovski is the best rental available and a two way centre that is a 60 pointer who can be a game breaker. I would rather go to Hawks for McNeill + 2nd/3rd in that case.

Sonny21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 10:23 PM
  #33
uncleben85
My face is my mask.
 
uncleben85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,654
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NugentHopkinsfan View Post
These proposals are just crazy aren't they

They want a great prospect Ellis, a first round pick, and a goalie who can start for them in exchange to rent a second liner? it's insanity.

Oh but they'll throw in some garbage and make it look like you're getting a bunch lol.
ellis is indeed a great prospect. blum might be more approriate, though still really good

later first round pick in a draft thats all over the place and not too deep

linds wouldnt start. he'd be stuck in the same rotating door that Gus is in with Reimer right now

and Grabos not a 2nd liner. guy doesnt get the credit he deserves.
though the whole rental thing is a turn off for other teams, i understand that. reality is though rental prices are usually high, and if he was signed, thered be no trade involving him.


i DO recognize that it favours the Leafs, im not saying its the best deal, but there could definitely be worse!

uncleben85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 10:24 PM
  #34
LatvianTwist
Global Moderator
 
LatvianTwist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston
Country: Tibet
Posts: 18,465
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gopreds9 View Post
Deal. I'd do it without your 2nd added in, but i love Ribs, so i'm biased
Yea, Blum + Budish + 1st was what we came to in the other thread, so I figured the upgrade from Budish to Spaling would be worth a 2nd, or 2 rounds down in the draft. I'd take any of:

Blum + Budish + 1st
Blum + Spaling + 3rd
Blum + Spaling + 1st (we add a 2nd)

LatvianTwist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 10:27 PM
  #35
NugentHopkinsfan
Registered User
 
NugentHopkinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,091
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by uncleben85 View Post
ellis is indeed a great prospect. blum might be more approriate, though still really good

later first round pick in a draft thats all over the place and not too deep

linds wouldnt start. he'd be stuck in the same rotating door that Gus is in with Reimer right now

and Grabos not a 2nd liner. guy doesnt get the credit he deserves.
though the whole rental thing is a turn off for other teams, i understand that. reality is though rental prices are usually high, and if he was signed, thered be no trade involving him.
Grabs isn't a first liner though, even in Toronto even if he is their most competitive, hardest working, and most consistent player.

I think you guys are a forward away from being terrifying and Grabovski would be a great addition but he's not worth a package like that IMO. A good prospect and a first is just too much for any rental outside of players like Hossa back in the day who are on another level.

NugentHopkinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 10:28 PM
  #36
Webersmashpuck
Registered User
 
Webersmashpuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Spring Hill
Country: United States
Posts: 1,132
vCash: 500
I don't see any of the Toronto proposals working. Many are way off in value and if I remember correctly wasn't there some sort of issue between Grabovski and Kostitsyn? That might make him a no go.

Webersmashpuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 10:30 PM
  #37
Top 6 Spaling
Registered User
 
Top 6 Spaling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Smashville
Country: United States
Posts: 10,389
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatvianTwist View Post
Yea, Blum + Budish + 1st was what we came to in the other thread, so I figured the upgrade from Budish to Spaling would be worth a 2nd, or 2 rounds down in the draft. I'd take any of:

Blum + Budish + 1st
Blum + Spaling + 3rd
Blum + Spaling + 1st (we add a 2nd)
I do any of those with no second thoughts. I'd prefer the 2nd one though.

Top 6 Spaling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 10:37 PM
  #38
AtlantaWhaler
Moderator
Thrash/Preds/Sabres
 
AtlantaWhaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Country: United States
Posts: 11,859
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey 4 Life View Post
To
Nashville
Clark Macarthur
2012 2nd
2013 2nd
Jonas Gustavson
Toronto
Jonathon Blum
Anders Lindback
2012 1st
Dude... Stop.

AtlantaWhaler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 10:40 PM
  #39
braindead
Registered User
 
braindead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The cookie spoke
Country: Tibet
Posts: 2,772
vCash: 500
If this is a "go for it" trade for the Preds, it makes no sense to throw Spaling in for any of those packages. He is severely underrated for his current contributions-- Preds would want to substitute a prospect and keep the lineup intact.

braindead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 11:02 PM
  #40
Exit Dose
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cerritos, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 18,885
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingJet View Post
Probably Bobby Ryan and Peter Holland for 1st, Watson, Blum, Spaling and Lindback
We're not looking for quantity.

Exit Dose is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 11:05 PM
  #41
Petro Points
Registered User
 
Petro Points's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,343
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gopreds9 View Post
What could the Predators get for this package? We're definetly looking for offensive forwards, preferably snipers. Centers and wingers are both fine. Other pieces that can be thrown in are Anders Lindback, Matt Halischuk, Taylor Beck, Micheal Latta, Austin Watson, Mattias Ekholm, and Ryan Ellis (would replace Blum, and he won't be cheap).

Who can the preds get?
Hemsky + Omark for Ellis\Blum + 1st

Petro Points is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 11:25 PM
  #42
smoke meat pete*
VoiceofReason
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,905
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Webersmashpuck View Post
I don't see any of the Toronto proposals working. Many are way off in value and if I remember correctly wasn't there some sort of issue between Grabovski and Kostitsyn? That might make him a no go.
They made peace before the Olympics.

smoke meat pete* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 11:34 PM
  #43
LatvianTwist
Global Moderator
 
LatvianTwist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston
Country: Tibet
Posts: 18,465
vCash: 500
Oh god, If Radulov comes back...

Radulov - Ribeiro - ???

I don't care who's on the wing, that would be scary as ****.

How much for Radulov?

LatvianTwist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 11:36 PM
  #44
trotzian brow
Registered User
 
trotzian brow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 296
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by dynrehab View Post
They made peace before the Olympics.
who's that in your avatar?

trotzian brow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 11:40 PM
  #45
uncleben85
My face is my mask.
 
uncleben85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,654
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NugentHopkinsfan View Post
Grabs isn't a first liner though, even in Toronto even if he is their most competitive, hardest working, and most consistent player.

I think you guys are a forward away from being terrifying and Grabovski would be a great addition but he's not worth a package like that IMO. A good prospect and a first is just too much for any rental outside of players like Hossa back in the day who are on another level.
Grabs is easily on tier/ahead with the likes of Weiss, Ribeiro, or other forwards Brown, Clowe.

to break it down really quickly with numbers...

he's tied for 11th in C goals, (18, currently tied with Kesler, EStaal, OJokinen, BRichards, Fisher, Hudler, Little) and tied for 28th in C pts (40 - BRichards, Gagner, Krejci). he's hitting 50% of faceoffs and has a respectable 15% shooting percentage. All while sitting at 54th for TOI as a C (sitting at 936:03 versus BRichards' 1,167:14)He's also only 58th for PP TOI as a C. not the most consistent linemates this season either.

A +7 on a negative differential team and only 16PIM, often playing against the other teams' top lines. unfortunately only around 30 hits this season and only 25 blocked shots, though he's certainly not afraid to get his body involved in any part of the ice

obviously heart and hustle doesnt make a player top line material, but it certainly doesnt hurt. he wont stop skating, and he's pretty quick, to boot. good offensive instinct. good defensive instinct.

in no way is he a top line elite player. but i would say he's a top 30 centreman and easily worthy of top line minutes on the majority of the teams in the league


Last edited by uncleben85: 02-22-2012 at 11:58 PM.
uncleben85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 11:41 PM
  #46
Loso
Registered User
 
Loso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,028
vCash: 500
Blum + 1st + condition 4th which becomes a 3rd if Nashville makes the conference final for Grabovski + AHL defenseman with NHL potential (ex: Holzer, Mikus, Gysbers)?

HOWEVER.

Toronto is in a playoff race and likely wants to keep Grabo.

If we did do MacArthur for Blum it would allow us to do Schenn for JVR which makes things interesting.

Loso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 11:46 PM
  #47
Sonny21
Registerd User
 
Sonny21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,689
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loso View Post
Blum + 1st + condition 4th which becomes a 3rd if Nashville makes the conference final for Grabovski + AHL defenseman with NHL potential (ex: Holzer, Mikus, Gysbers)?

HOWEVER.

Toronto is in a playoff race and likely wants to keep Grabo.

If we did do MacArthur for Blum it would allow us to do Schenn for JVR which makes things interesting.
I don't see them trading Blum and 1st for a rental but I would jump on any deal that involves Blum. Blum + 2nd would be perfect.

I would be more then ecstatic if Leafs got a package of either McNeill + 2nd or Blum +2nd for Grabovski and I think it's a well deserved for both sides.

We're fighting for playoffs so I can understand, but not enough hype about a player like Grabo being possibly available.

Sonny21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 11:48 PM
  #48
uncleben85
My face is my mask.
 
uncleben85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,654
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonny21 View Post
I don't see them trading Blum and 1st for a rental but I would jump on any deal that involves Blum. Blum + 2nd would be perfect.

I would be more then ecstatic if Leafs got a package of either McNeill + 2nd or Blum +2nd for Grabovski and I think it's a well deserved for both sides.

We're fighting for playoffs so I can understand, but not enough hype about a player like Grabo being possibly available.
Blum + cond 2nd?

condition being if Preds make SCF it becomes a 1st?

uncleben85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-22-2012, 11:57 PM
  #49
LatvianTwist
Global Moderator
 
LatvianTwist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston
Country: Tibet
Posts: 18,465
vCash: 500
I could probably see a deal next year working out even better for Nashville. They'll have everyone they need under contract, and know how much they can spend, as well as have Radulov back for cheap, and they'll probably be odds on favorites with 2 great PPG forwards, their insane defense, and Rinne.

LatvianTwist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-23-2012, 12:03 AM
  #50
Sonny21
Registerd User
 
Sonny21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,689
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by uncleben85 View Post
Blum + cond 2nd?

condition being if Preds make SCF it becomes a 1st?
I think it's good, essentially it's Blum + 2nd but yeah if they make SCF or maybe re-signs then 1st.

If Leafs get Blum + 2nd, anything extra would be gravy.

Sonny21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.