Low, wearing a helmet and a visor and punching on a guy who has no head protection.
I have less of a problem with it since he doesn't fight as much.. **** I don't even think he's got more than 5 fighting majors in his career. He should've taken off the helmet but it still wouldn't have changed the fight.
This is why I like Jack Edwards (and why everyone else hates him)
Honestly, I think that vid's a perfect example of why Edwards is a good announcer.
He didn't say anything slanderous or untrue about Armstrong. Right before the hit he was kind-of complimenting him on being a blue-collar player and he didn't overreact to the hit on Seidenberg... just commented that Armstrong came all the way across to throw it, which was true. On the replay, Brickley pointed out that Seidenberg did indeed lose an edge.
The only thing to get upset about is that Edwards clearly enjoyed seeing Seidenberg win the fight. And being a Bruins fan, why wouldn't he? Good fight call IMO.
The word destroyed gets used so liberally around here, eh?
In this case, yes Armstrong was destroyed and good riddance. It's not that he's "dirty" or another Cooke, as some would want you to believe, it's just... he brings absolutely nothing to the table, and that's all.
I think Armstrong is at a disadvantage in fights because of his dumb face. If I were in a fight, and my opposition had a similar, stupid face, I would have an increased motivation to just punch it in and punish it. This is probably what happens with Armstrong. Patrick Kane would probably fill him in.