HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > Other Sports > Football
Football NFL, NCAA, CFL

All Purpose Los Angeles NFL Thread

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
03-30-2012, 02:58 PM
  #426
Melrose Munch
Registered User
 
Melrose Munch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,911
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moo View Post
I don't see the Vikings going anywhere unless the deal in place with the government completely falls apart instead of getting approved.

I also don't see the Jags moving anywhere immediately unless the attendance issues continue. The new owner is at least trying to stay put.
That's already happened. Zygi should sell and just build a mall at Arden Hills.

Melrose Munch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 03:58 PM
  #427
Moo
Moooooooooooooooo!
 
Moo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Valrico, FL
Posts: 29,028
vCash: 28761
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melrose Munch View Post
That's already happened. Zygi should sell and just build a mall at Arden Hills.
The last I read the charities were upset with their amount of coin being given to them in the deal but there was still time to remedy that. Is there something else I am missing?

Moo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 05:15 PM
  #428
VLoo
Registered User
 
VLoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,384
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moo View Post
I also don't see the Jags moving anywhere immediately unless the attendance issues continue. The new owner is at least trying to stay put.
I still don't get this one, they haven't had a blackout in a few years. There are quite a few teams who can't say that. Even with the tarps it still has a larger capacity than many other stadiums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by iRep TheWingedWheel View Post
Ain't the Jags locked in a lease til 2030 too?
I still believe this will be the largest issue with relocation. I don't think Khan would be the guy to bring it to LA because there's no way the prospective stadium owner(name escapes me) is going to just own the stadium and not the team. So he'd have to buy the team, build the stadium and buyout a massive lease. The bills add up quickly.

VLoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 07:48 PM
  #429
Melrose Munch
Registered User
 
Melrose Munch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,911
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moo View Post
The last I read the charities were upset with their amount of coin being given to them in the deal but there was still time to remedy that. Is there something else I am missing?
The Legislature does not support the deal.
http://www.minnpost.com/politics-pol...s-breakthrough

Very bad. I think Wilf will give and sell.

Melrose Munch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:12 AM
  #430
blueandgoldguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Greg's River Heights
Posts: 1,296
vCash: 500
Yep, no surprise there. I always thought it would be tricky for LA to lure an NFL team to their city with the terms set down by the financier of the stadium. This gives Wilf less leverage with politicians in Minnesota and they know it. Wouldn't be surprised to see a stadium announcement delayed for the Vikings until later this year or even early next year.

Maybe Wilf will have to cough up a little more moolah or agree to give a percentage of something ie parking, naming rights, etc. Regardless, he'll play ball. In a football mad city of 3.2 million city with the 4th highest tv ratings in the country there's money to be made, even if he does have to pay nearly 50% of the stadium costs.

blueandgoldguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 02:22 AM
  #431
Brodie
only I may dance
 
Brodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Michigan
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 9,039
vCash: 500
I thought the NFL had made it known that they still preferred the Industry stadium anyway?

And the Chargers are it. Even if Wilf sells, someone will buy to keep the Vikings local. They're way too storied, it'd be even worse than Modell moving the Browns. The Chargers aren't even at the table and the family has considered selling a controlling share.

Brodie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-01-2012, 09:38 PM
  #432
BK Triple Threat
Not Here To Be Liked
 
BK Triple Threat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Middle of nowhere
Posts: 9,481
vCash: 500
feel so bad for LA.....................

BK Triple Threat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-01-2012, 09:39 PM
  #433
BK Triple Threat
Not Here To Be Liked
 
BK Triple Threat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Middle of nowhere
Posts: 9,481
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by iRep TheWingedWheel View Post
Ain't the Jags locked in a lease til 2030 too?

The Vikes I think will get done by next offseason. Maybe this one but its not looking like thats gonna happen at the moment.

I think the top 2 candidates for LA are San Diego and St. Louis.
As a minor league sports fan I can tell you..."contracts are made to be broken"

BK Triple Threat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-04-2012, 02:54 AM
  #434
TTOMO
Registered User
 
TTOMO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Port Moody, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 938
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Green Men Rule View Post
feel so bad for LA.....................
I feel bad for Vikings fans. They deserve better.

TTOMO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2012, 09:09 PM
  #435
Melrose Munch
Registered User
 
Melrose Munch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,911
vCash: 500
L.A., Toronto dangled as NFL relocation threat

http://www.cbc.ca/sports/football/nf...s-jaguars.html

Quote:
NFL officials have said repeatedly that the league isn't interested in expansion, and with cities including Los Angeles and Toronto among the spots that could host a team, it creates a situation in which the threat of relocation will hang for some time over cities and states faced with franchise demands for a new stadium.
Quote:
In an interview last month, NFL vice-president of business operations Eric Grubman said he has a list "longer than my arm" of interested buyers in cities "all over the place," but named only Los Angeles and Toronto as viable markets the league would currently consider.
And just because I have been accused of bias before.

Quote:
But it has to be said - Los Angeles doesn't deserve an NFL team, and there are a host of good reasons why. Though it is the second-largest media market in the United States and NFL commissioner Roger Goodell has been on record as saying that he and the league want a franchise to return to the Entertainment Capital of the World, Los Angeles has several reasons not to be a host city for the most popular professional sports league in the United States.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/5-reaso...0777--nfl.html

Melrose Munch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2012, 09:17 PM
  #436
ixcuincle
Global Moderator
The Legend
 
ixcuincle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Twitter
Posts: 112,270
vCash: 500
I don't think Toronto would be a good idea. I think LA would be a great idea.

__________________
www.twitter.com/ixcuincle
ixcuincle is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-20-2012, 09:29 PM
  #437
AP
Dirty Hypocrite
 
AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Country: Mexico
Posts: 21,155
vCash: 8350
Not surprised by this but at the rate things are going, the only way LA gets another NFL team is by expansion unless if any other team gets put on relocation hot seat.

AP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-21-2012, 01:08 AM
  #438
EpochLink
Canucks and Jets fan
 
EpochLink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,027
vCash: 500
Los Angeles is getting an NFL team soon..

EpochLink is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-21-2012, 01:30 AM
  #439
BK Triple Threat
Not Here To Be Liked
 
BK Triple Threat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Middle of nowhere
Posts: 9,481
vCash: 500
For the love of god....how many times will we hear this???

As for LA they are fickle sports fan, will only back winners(except for maybe the Lakers)

But they already have a pro team basically in the USC Trojans.

BK Triple Threat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-21-2012, 11:54 AM
  #440
Melrose Munch
Registered User
 
Melrose Munch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,911
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Green Men Rule View Post
For the love of god....how many times will we hear this???

As for LA they are fickle sports fan, will only back winners(except for maybe the Lakers)

But they already have a pro team basically in the USC Trojans.
They have to keep talking to keep these small markets on the edge.

Melrose Munch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-21-2012, 12:50 PM
  #441
Renbarg
Registered User
 
Renbarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NY
Country: United States
Posts: 8,350
vCash: 500
I've never heard Toronto legitimately mentioned in a non-Canada based news-story.

L.A. will probably get the Chargers sooner or later.

Vegas, Portland, heck even places like Salt Lake City, Omaha and Oklahoma City would get more consideration before Toronto.

Renbarg is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-21-2012, 02:23 PM
  #442
BK Triple Threat
Not Here To Be Liked
 
BK Triple Threat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Middle of nowhere
Posts: 9,481
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renbarg View Post
I've never heard Toronto legitimately mentioned in a non-Canada based news-story.

L.A. will probably get the Chargers sooner or later.

Vegas, Portland, heck even places like Salt Lake City, Omaha and Oklahoma City would get more consideration before Toronto.
Toronto is mentioned often in Upstate NY regarding the Bills.

BK Triple Threat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-21-2012, 02:29 PM
  #443
Melrose Munch
Registered User
 
Melrose Munch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,911
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renbarg View Post
I've never heard Toronto legitimately mentioned in a non-Canada based news-story.

L.A. will probably get the Chargers sooner or later.

Vegas, Portland, heck even places like Salt Lake City, Omaha and Oklahoma City would get more consideration before Toronto.
Toronto was mentioned for the Rams and one other place a while back, I don't remember which one it was.

Melrose Munch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-21-2012, 06:41 PM
  #444
GKJ
Global Moderator
Entertainment
 
GKJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Do not trade plz
Country: United States
Posts: 101,947
vCash: 1328
Toronto getting a team is not a matter of if but when. Whether it's 5, 10, 20 years, it's going to happen eventually.

GKJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 03:41 AM
  #445
BK Triple Threat
Not Here To Be Liked
 
BK Triple Threat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Middle of nowhere
Posts: 9,481
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by GKJ View Post
Toronto getting a team is not a matter of if but when. Whether it's 5, 10, 20 years, it's going to happen eventually.
and bomb miserably.

BK Triple Threat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 04:48 AM
  #446
kingsholygrail
Good to be the Kings
 
kingsholygrail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Derpifornia
Country: United States
Posts: 32,719
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Green Men Rule View Post
For the love of god....how many times will we hear this???

As for LA they are fickle sports fan, will only back winners(except for maybe the Lakers)

But they already have a pro team basically in the USC Trojans.
I don't know where this reputation comes from. LA teams consistently have good attendance levels even in franchises that haven't won in a long time or won at all.

kingsholygrail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 05:04 AM
  #447
Hasbro
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Hasbro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: South Rectangle
Country: Sami
Posts: 27,662
vCash: 500
In other news: Earth=round.

Hasbro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 06:57 AM
  #448
BK Triple Threat
Not Here To Be Liked
 
BK Triple Threat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Middle of nowhere
Posts: 9,481
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingsholygrail View Post
I don't know where this reputation comes from. LA teams consistently have good attendance levels even in franchises that haven't won in a long time or won at all.
Say what??? Everytime I watch a Dodgers game it's never sold out. If it is, many don't show. The Clippers I can't imagine sell well. The Angels don't count and I don't follow hockey enough to care.

BK Triple Threat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 07:40 AM
  #449
GKJ
Global Moderator
Entertainment
 
GKJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Do not trade plz
Country: United States
Posts: 101,947
vCash: 1328
Quote:
Originally Posted by Green Men Rule View Post
and bomb miserably.
NFL teams don't bomb.

GKJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 10:41 AM
  #450
NewtJorden
Sharks/Packers Fan
 
NewtJorden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rimouski
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,830
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to NewtJorden
Quote:
Originally Posted by EpochLink View Post
Los Angeles is getting an NFL team soon..
Isnt that what people been saying for almost 20 years now?

NewtJorden is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.