HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

1st overall pick to Toronto.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
03-31-2012, 10:41 AM
  #51
Rob Brown
Riot Specialist
 
Rob Brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,638
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaketheCannoli View Post
OK- keep that in mind

The best Burke could do to equal that is

Gardiner
Leafs 2012 1st
Leafs 2013 1st
Leafs 2012 2nd
Leafs 2012 4th

Leaf fans, is that a deal?
Guess not. This is is a pretty brutal offer.

Rob Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 10:43 AM
  #52
JustinCider
Registered User
 
JustinCider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Earth
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,053
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Brown View Post
Hopefully you're joking.
if he's not, Edmonton would take the deal for sure. They'd still get one of the dmen they want with the 5th overall pick and they'd add a prospect, and a young dman with top 4 potential, who struggled this year, but still possesses the tools to be a solid top 4 dman. It'd be a lot to give up for Toronto, but if they really want Grigs, it's probably gonna cost something similar. Remember, there will be other team's bidding for that pick too, so it's not going to be cheap.

JustinCider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 10:44 AM
  #53
bizzz
Registered User
 
bizzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Minsk
Country: Tokelau
Posts: 2,096
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1927 View Post
As indicated in my previous post, read post 25.

Nazem Kadri on the Marlies
GP G A PTS
44 17 24 41

Bobby Ryan on the Chops
GP G A PTS
48 21 28 49

Ryan played 14 games thereafter and then went on to play for the Ducks.
Robby Schremp at the same age on the Springfield Falcons
GP G A PTS
78 23 53 76

bizzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 12:53 PM
  #54
1927
Maj. Conn Smythe
 
1927's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brock, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 923
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayor Bee View Post
Iowa lasted one single season, so either he played 14 games in that season or he didn't. You re-emphasizing what I should or shouldn't read doesn't make your numbers right, as the AHL's official numbers bear out.

http://theahl.com/stats/player.php?id=1213

Regardless, there are few things more worthless than comparing AHL scoring to NHL success. In any given year, there's a good number of young AHL players who put up numbers and yet either aren't NHL prospects or, if they are, don't make it in the NHL. I remember every year, when Justin Papineau would score in the preseason and get sent down, and he would score in bunches in the AHL. There's a few of those in every season.
My apologies the numbers came from Hockey DB and I mixed up the season Bobby Ryan played on the Portland Pirates before they became the Iowa Chops.

http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/p....php?pid=76888

Either way, Ryan produced those similar numbers to what Kadri has produced this season. The only reason this was even brought up is for the simple fact that some people on HFBoards are calling Kadri a bust, when in fact he hasn't even fully played one NHL season yet. I am not saying Kadri will become a good player, all I am stating is that it is premature to be calling a prospect a bust so early.

Kadri can go either way becoming the next Bobby Ryan, or Papineau, or he can be something in between. However, the consensus amongst the hockey world is that Kadri is the Maple Leafs top prospect and he would garner interest from other NHL teams. There is no sugar coating anything here. No one knows what the future holds for any prospect that is why these players are prospects and not NHL players.

Quote:
Originally Posted by topdog View Post
Who give a **** what Kadri is producing in the AHL. Many players have done good in the AHL only to fall flat on their face in the NHL. Trying to compare Kadri to Ryan on what each did in the AHL is just plainly stupid.

Your just grasping at straws to make your player look better.
Than you use 1 friggin trade that happened 9 yrs ago to Try to make the OP's offer sound reasonable.What a joke of a post.
Not grasping at straws, just being objective here. By stating Kadri is a bust is just as bad as saying he will become a star. As stated above, no one knows for sure what Kadri will become, but to call him a bust is just wrong.

If Columbus has no need for Kadri than another team will, a General Manager would welcome Kadri on their team. Just ask Bryan Murray, he wanted to trade up in the draft to pick Kadri for the Senators. It's not HF Leafs fans talking up Kadri to make him "look better" it is other General Managers in the NHL that have shown interest in Kadri like Murray.

As for using the first overall trade that happened nine years ago, I was simply stating the FACTS and answering your question:

Quote:
Originally Posted by topdog View Post
When was the last time that you saw the 1st overall pick get traded fo next to nothing. It just don't happen.
The answer to that was in 2003 when Pittsburgh traded 3rd overall, 2nd round pick and Mikael Samuelsson to Florida for first overall plus!

To move two spots all it took was a 2nd round pick and a roster player. For the Leafs to move four spots up it doesn't seem unreasonable to trade their top prospect, plus a young defender and their 5th overall pick.

Maybe something more is required, but it would not require selling the farm. If Columbus does not want to draft a Russian player than they will move the draft pick for more assets.

However, if Scott Howson is smart he will just draft Yakupov and not even worry about entertaining any offers. That is what Columbus SHOULD do. However, if they do not than a potential deal can be had.

From a Leafs perspective, Brian Burke will not trade the 1st pick 2012, AND 1st pick 2013 ++ as some here have suggested. That would be horrible asset management, and the Leafs would be better keeping their hypothetical 5th overall pick and not trading at all.

1927 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:14 PM
  #55
smoke meat pete*
VoiceofReason
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,858
vCash: 500
I can't imagine Burke wants Nail, and is most interested in Galchenyuk. We need a center, and he will likely be our target, with Grigs as a back-up plan. With a few teams wanting a defenceman, Burke will be on top of who will be available at our pick.

There's no need to get to #1.


Last edited by smoke meat pete*: 03-31-2012 at 01:19 PM.
smoke meat pete* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:19 PM
  #56
JustinCider
Registered User
 
JustinCider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Earth
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,053
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by smoke meat pete View Post
I can't imagine Burke wants Nail, and is most interested in Galchenyuk. We need a center, and he will likely be our target, with Grigs as a back-up plan. With a few teams wanting a defenceman, Burke will be on top of who will be available at our pick.
If he's happy with either one (Grigs or Galchenyuk), then there is a good chance one of them will be available at 5. Toronto could end up picking anywhere from 1st to 11th. Way too early to tell.

JustinCider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:21 PM
  #57
smoke meat pete*
VoiceofReason
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,858
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustinCider View Post
If he's happy with either one (Grigs or Galchenyuk), then there is a good chance one of them will be available at 5. Toronto could end up picking anywhere from 1st to 8th. Way too early to tell.
I think 7th or 8th is starting to be a stretch. But it is very possible those 3 are gone in the top 4. I think Burke will want to be top 3, but top 4 if Edmonton keeps their pick and grabs a defenceman. Minnesota is a "Wild" card. I'm interested to see how they change things.

smoke meat pete* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:24 PM
  #58
SoupNazi
Homerist!
 
SoupNazi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Soup Kitchen
Country: Argentina
Posts: 6,256
vCash: 455
How many of these threads are we going to see between now and the draft?

SoupNazi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:26 PM
  #59
smoke meat pete*
VoiceofReason
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,858
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoupNazi View Post
How many of these threads are we going to see between now and the draft?
Plenty. Many. Lots

smoke meat pete* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:28 PM
  #60
JustinCider
Registered User
 
JustinCider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Earth
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,053
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by smoke meat pete View Post
I think 7th or 8th is starting to be a stretch.
I changed it up to a 11th, 6th and 10th are separated by only 3 points. Time is running out, but it would only take 2 wins in their last 4 games to possibly put them in 9th. They play the Sabres twice, the Bolts, and the Habs. They could win 3, or lose all 4, who knows. Very tight from 21st to 29th. Only CBJ knows where they'll end up.

JustinCider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:28 PM
  #61
JustinCider
Registered User
 
JustinCider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Earth
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,053
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoupNazi View Post
How many of these threads are we going to see between now and the draft?
Good thing you wasted your time to post this question.

JustinCider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:29 PM
  #62
smoke meat pete*
VoiceofReason
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,858
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustinCider View Post
I changed it up to a 11th, 6th and 10th are separated by only 3 points. Time is running out, but it would only take 2 wins in their last 4 games to possibly put them in 9th. They play the Sabres twice, the Bolts, and the Habs. They could win 3, or lose all 4, who knows. Very tight from 21st to 29th. Only CBJ knows where they'll end up.
Have you seen us play lately?

smoke meat pete* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:34 PM
  #63
rockinghockey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,868
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaketheCannoli View Post
No they don't.

Try this out:

To Edmonton

Schenn
Kadri
Toronto 1st 2012

To Toronto

Edmonton 1st 2012 assuming it's 1st or 2nd
Switch Kadri to Colborne and I would do it for EDM's 2nd.

rockinghockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:44 PM
  #64
zeus3007*
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 13,228
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaketheCannoli View Post
No they don't.

Try this out:

To Edmonton

Schenn
Kadri
Toronto 1st 2012

To Toronto

Edmonton 1st 2012 assuming it's 1st or 2nd
We don't have room for Kadri unless we can trade Horcoff (which we can't), so I am not interested in this kind of deal. Change Schenn and Kadri to Gardiner and add a piece coming back from Edmonton (David Musil or Curtis Hamilton, depending on Toronto's wants).

Edmonton first, Curtis Hamilton

for

Toronto first, Jake Gardiner

Of course this would be after the lottery, if Edmonton ends up with 2nd and the Leafs 5th. The difference between Grigorenko and the 4-5 pick is significant enough that I would need a Gardiner type piece coming back to agree. Burke of course says no though.

zeus3007* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 02:04 PM
  #65
JustinCider
Registered User
 
JustinCider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Earth
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,053
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by smoke meat pete View Post
Have you seen us play lately?
The Habs have been just as bad, a home and home with any team is tough to sweep, and the Bolts are brutal too.
Someone has to win these games.

JustinCider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 02:52 PM
  #66
TaketheCannoli
RIP
 
TaketheCannoli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Country: United States
Posts: 7,998
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralSwell View Post
You can't be serious? While the original offer was a lowball, this is ridiculous. Leafs pick is looking like it will be anywhere from 1-4 spots below. To move up you want our best defenceman, who happens to be 21, our 2nd, AND our 1st in a much stronger draft next year???

A big giant pass from me. I'd rather do the proposed 1st+kadri+gardiner for nash trade.... and that's saying a lot.
That's what Burke PAID for the 1st overall in 1999. Seems like using that as a guide is fair to me.


It's really pretty simple. What's totally missing in this thread is the idea that Columbus likely will have the 1st overall pick. If Toronto wants it, they have to offer something Columbus thinks is more valuable to Columbus than that pick. It's not about what's "fair" to the Leafs; it's all about what it will take for Columbus to prefer the offer to the 1st overall. If you don't offer that, you won't get the pick.
Columbus doesn't need or want Franson, Kadri or Colborne. Columbus needs a #1 Goalie, top pairing defense and lots of high picks.

TaketheCannoli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 05:20 PM
  #67
mark3361
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 340
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1927 View Post

Kadri can go either way becoming the next Bobby Ryan, or Papineau, or he can be something in between. However, the consensus amongst the hockey world is that Kadri is the Maple Leafs top prospect and he would garner interest from other NHL teams. There is no sugar coating anything here. No one knows what the future holds for any prospect that is why these players are prospects and not NHL players.

Not grasping at straws, just being objective here. By stating Kadri is a bust is just as bad as saying he will become a star. As stated above, no one knows for sure what Kadri will become, but to call him a bust is just wrong.


.
Except for stats, there isnt one similarity between Ryan and Kadri. Yay stats, the ultimate crutch for faulty thinking! Ryan's ceiling at draft was prototype power forward if he could improve his skating. his size and skill would make him a useful player even if he was on the 3rd line. Kadri's ceiling is Marc Savard, whose skill and savy make up for lack of size. Kadri's bust potential is much higher. If he doesnt develop, he's likely not in the NHL. He isnt going to play a bottom six role.

mark3361 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 05:42 PM
  #68
Alexander Baigle
Registered User
 
Alexander Baigle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Great White North
Country: Ethiopia
Posts: 714
vCash: 500
Honestly, Colborne + First for edmonton's first is fair. Instead of picking Grigorenko at second, they get Joe Colborne and possibly Ryan Murray.

Alexander Baigle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 05:51 PM
  #69
quat
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 7,764
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to quat
Quote:
Originally Posted by topdog View Post
Overpayment by the Jackets.
Do Leaf fans really believe that if they put enough garbage together in a offer that the Jackets will bite?The OP's offer is just terrible.When was the last time that you saw the 1st overall pick get traded fo next to nothing. It just don't happen.
WTH? Garbage? Next to nothing? Hyperbole much?

Why not just say it isn't enough to interest Columbus, or better yet engage in an actual conversation that wouldn't get you punched if you spoke that way in person?

In what world is a top 5 pick, a former #7 overall who is looking good in the AHL plus a decent defender, for a top two pick that the GM is on record having interest in moving anywhere close to being nothing or garbage? Maybe it's not enough, but it's certainly in the ballpark. It's embarrassing how dumped on Kadri is getting these days, and the last time I looked there were some extremely good prospects available at the #5 selection.

The homers on this board are freaking awesome in their all their embarrassing splendor!

quat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 05:56 PM
  #70
quat
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 7,764
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to quat
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaketheCannoli View Post
That's what Burke PAID for the 1st overall in 1999. Seems like using that as a guide is fair to me.


It's really pretty simple. What's totally missing in this thread is the idea that Columbus likely will have the 1st overall pick. If Toronto wants it, they have to offer something Columbus thinks is more valuable to Columbus than that pick. It's not about what's "fair" to the Leafs; it's all about what it will take for Columbus to prefer the offer to the 1st overall. If you don't offer that, you won't get the pick.
Columbus doesn't need or want Franson, Kadri or Colborne. Columbus needs a #1 Goalie, top pairing defense and lots of high picks.
And according to many of their fans they shouldn't have to pay much to get those. Funny how that works.

quat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 05:59 PM
  #71
Shrimper
Dan Bylsma out
 
Shrimper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 35,602
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaketheCannoli View Post
If I give you your assessment of the players which I disagree with, did you even bother to find out Columbus's needs?




Columbus doesn't need Kessel or Grabovski. They need top pairing defense and a #1 goaltender. I don't see those..
It wasn't a point of who they needed that I was making, more that it's the kind've value that they'd have to give up to get the 1st round pick. Also, if Columbus wants/needs a top pairing defender and a #1 goaltender, why are Nazem Kadri and Cody Franson who isn't a top defenseman being considered?

Shrimper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 06:37 PM
  #72
mark3361
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 340
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by quat View Post
WTH? Garbage? Next to nothing? Hyperbole much?

In what world is a top 5 pick, a former #7 overall who is looking good in the AHL plus a decent defender, for a top two pick that the GM is on record having interest in moving anywhere close to being nothing or garbage? Maybe it's not enough, but it's certainly in the ballpark. It's embarrassing how dumped on Kadri is getting these days, and the last time I looked there were some extremely good prospects available at the #5 selection.
In the world of NHL value? There isnt immediate help in this draft except for maybe #1. No one cares where Kadri was drafted anymore. His value is what GMs think his potential NHL career is now. Decent defenders are available on waivers

mark3361 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 10:00 PM
  #73
vipernsx
Flatus Expeller
 
vipernsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Country: United States
Posts: 5,371
vCash: 500
Oh the joy of Leaf fan proposals...endless laughs.

vipernsx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 10:05 PM
  #74
Dr Swag
Banned User
 
Dr Swag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: T.
Country: Canada
Posts: 789
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by vipernsx View Post
Oh the joy of Leaf fan proposals...endless laughs.
It's funny because the 1st overall is overrated and Leafs would be shooting themselves in the foot if they made ANY of the deals in this thread.

Dr Swag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 10:11 PM
  #75
TaketheCannoli
RIP
 
TaketheCannoli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Country: United States
Posts: 7,998
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by quat View Post
And according to many of their fans they shouldn't have to pay much to get those. Funny how that works.
Here's how it really works. They will either have the #1 or #2 pick. If someone offers Columbus more than Columbus thinks that pick is worth, they will trade it. If they don't, they will make the pick. The odds of the player picked 1st overall or even 2nd overall becoming an elite player, likely a franchise player are pretty high. They can't lose either way.

TaketheCannoli is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.