HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > San Jose Sharks
Notices

Looks like Ignla wants out of Calgary

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
04-07-2012, 07:17 PM
  #1
WantonAbandon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,285
vCash: 500
Looks like Ignla wants out of Calgary

Where do you think he will end up? Could the Sharks be interested?


Vicki Hall ‏ @vickihallch



Iginla: Do I want to be on a team where we’re going to fully rebuild? I don’t know that I do. I think Calgary is a v good organization...

WantonAbandon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2012, 07:33 PM
  #2
210
Registered User
 
210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Worcester, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 8,266
vCash: 500
He's more than earned the right to want to move on to a winner...

210 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2012, 07:33 PM
  #3
MadmanSJ
Know Your Onion!
 
MadmanSJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Jose
Country: United States
Posts: 1,317
vCash: 500
Do I want one of my favorite players? Hell yeah!

V02 to the max! He will last in the league as long as Chelios did.

MadmanSJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2012, 07:33 PM
  #4
Eighth Fret
Registered User
 
Eighth Fret's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,740
vCash: 500
We don't know if Calgary is going to rebuild though. They should have started the rebuild process years ago.

Eighth Fret is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2012, 07:34 PM
  #5
Thorntonfan97
2013 QMJHL Champs!!
 
Thorntonfan97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Halifax
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,290
vCash: 157
Send a message via MSN to Thorntonfan97 Send a message via Yahoo to Thorntonfan97
But what would the Flames want?

Thorntonfan97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2012, 07:35 PM
  #6
WantonAbandon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,285
vCash: 500
Flames will probably look for picks and prospects although they would need some cap salary to return.

He is 35 so perhaps something like a first/or a couple of seconds and Demers or Clowe would do the trick. He will want to go to a competitor so they can't be too choosey. So they may have to settle for even less.


Last edited by WantonAbandon: 04-07-2012 at 07:42 PM.
WantonAbandon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2012, 07:37 PM
  #7
SactoShark
Integrity.
 
SactoShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sactopotato
Posts: 8,215
vCash: 50
What's the scouting report on this guy? Is he any good?

SactoShark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2012, 07:41 PM
  #8
Les Wynan*
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,745
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SactoShark View Post
What's the scouting report on this guy? Is he any good?
I know you're being sarcastic but he's not great anymore. Not even remotely worth that cap hit.

Les Wynan* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2012, 07:50 PM
  #9
WantonAbandon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,285
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Les Wynan View Post
I know you're being sarcastic but he's not great anymore. Not even remotely worth that cap hit.
Yeah but it is only for one year. Then it would be possible to sign him to a more reasonable two maybe three year extension. He would be great centering Couture and Havlat. The Sharks would of course ship Clowe elsewhere. I'd say he would score 40 goals on the Sharks. The top line of Marleau, Thornton, and Pavelski would likely improve as well. And if it doesn't work then in two years he would be gone and the new current era would close and the org would begin the new era.

WantonAbandon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2012, 07:50 PM
  #10
MadmanSJ
Know Your Onion!
 
MadmanSJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Jose
Country: United States
Posts: 1,317
vCash: 500
I'd take him for one year at 7m contingent upon him agreeing to a contract extension for an agreed upon low rate before the trade was completed.

He still has a lot left.

MadmanSJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2012, 07:56 PM
  #11
Les Wynan*
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,745
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WantonAbandon View Post
Yeah but it is only for one year. Then it would be possible to sign him to a more reasonable two maybe three year extension. He would be great centering Couture and Havlat. The Sharks would of course ship Clowe elsewhere. I'd say he would score 40 goals on the Sharks. The top line of Marleau, Thornton, and Pavelski would likely improve as well. And if it doesn't work then in two years he would be gone and the new current era would close and the org would begin the new era.
We've been through this with Heatley. Sharks fans need to stop salivating over every washed up one-dimensional winger who might potentially be available.

Iginla was horrible this season. When you have a 1013 PDO and still manage to finish -10, that's just embarrassing. Granted a lot of that was Sutter using him idiotically but he's nowhere near the player he once was. The Sharks would also assuredly lose a bidding war.

Les Wynan* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2012, 08:06 PM
  #12
gonegonegone*
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Diego
Country: United States
Posts: 3,338
vCash: 500
seeing how bad we dropped this season, i would be down with it contigent that we give up at most picks in the upcoming season along with some players going back for cap (havlat ideally if he waives, clowe maybe). i honestly think our window is one year now, we BARELY snuck in the playoffs this season. next season probably could be our last before we start sucking as a mediocre team. thus might as well just go for broke next season and see what happens. afterwards we absolutely need to start a rebuild, we have no prospects at all for a reasonable retool.

gonegonegone* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2012, 08:33 PM
  #13
WantonAbandon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,285
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Les Wynan View Post
We've been through this with Heatley. Sharks fans need to stop salivating over every washed up one-dimensional winger who might potentially be available.

Iginla was horrible this season. When you have a 1013 PDO and still manage to finish -10, that's just embarrassing. Granted a lot of that was Sutter using him idiotically but he's nowhere near the player he once was. The Sharks would also assuredly lose a bidding war.
He won't finish at a -10 with Couture and Havlat. All of his assets are still useful. He can do everything Clowe can do and is significantly better even on the decline and for once the Sharks would have someone who actually can play in front of the net.

Now with that said I wouldn't expect to give up as much as they did for Heatley. But if the price is right I don't see why not. With Ignla's presence the Sharks win the conference again.

WantonAbandon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2012, 08:34 PM
  #14
Mafoofoo
Hockey
 
Mafoofoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 11,101
vCash: 500
Yeah no. Stop making huge blockbuster trades. Let the team find some ******* chemistry and stuff. Minor **** is fine.

Mafoofoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2012, 08:37 PM
  #15
WantonAbandon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,285
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mafoofoo View Post
Yeah no. Stop making huge blockbuster trades. Let the team find some ******* chemistry and stuff. Minor **** is fine.
One way or the other the team has to be tweaked a bit. The Sharks either need to add a few goals or shoot for a defensive style team which would possibly require a bigger re-tool.

Ignla may be acquired at a pretty reasonable price. He has an NMC after all.

WantonAbandon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2012, 08:55 PM
  #16
Gene Parmesan
Ball-So-Hard-U
 
Gene Parmesan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 13,021
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WantonAbandon View Post
He won't finish at a -10 with Couture and Havlat. All of his assets are still useful. He can do everything Clowe can do and is significantly better even on the decline and for once the Sharks would have someone who actually can play in front of the net.

Now with that said I wouldn't expect to give up as much as they did for Heatley. But if the price is right I don't see why not. With Ignla's presence the Sharks win the conference again.
Iginla isn't that type of goal scorer. Just because the Sharks don't have a Holmstrom type isn't the end of the world. They score most of their goes off tips and rebounds and layer the front of the net. I don't think making a move for Iggy is good. Im a huge fan and have been but no thank you.

Gene Parmesan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2012, 08:59 PM
  #17
Mafoofoo
Hockey
 
Mafoofoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 11,101
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WantonAbandon View Post
One way or the other the team has to be tweaked a bit. The Sharks either need to add a few goals or shoot for a defensive style team which would possibly require a bigger re-tool.

Ignla may be acquired at a pretty reasonable price. He has an NMC after all.
There are teams Iginla would be happy to go to who could offer much more than SJ.

Mafoofoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2012, 09:03 PM
  #18
sjshark91
22 years of fail
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,001
vCash: 50
Please no.

The Sharks should try to keep the roster intact. Add a top 9 scoring forward and two dmen to replace White Vandy and possibly Murray.

No more overhauls.

Just my opinion.

sjshark91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2012, 09:05 PM
  #19
rangerssharks414
Registered User
 
rangerssharks414's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 8,335
vCash: 500
Iginla is one of my favorite players, but no thanks.

rangerssharks414 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2012, 09:21 PM
  #20
Gene Parmesan
Ball-So-Hard-U
 
Gene Parmesan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 13,021
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjshark91 View Post
Please no.

The Sharks should try to keep the roster intact. Add a top 9 scoring forward and two dmen to replace White Vandy and possibly Murray.

No more overhauls.

Just my opinion.
This. Id resign Vandy though.

Gene Parmesan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 10:43 PM
  #21
kluu
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 212
vCash: 500
trade marleau for iginla

kluu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 10:51 PM
  #22
SactoShark
Integrity.
 
SactoShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sactopotato
Posts: 8,215
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gene Parmesan View Post
This. Id resign Vandy though.
That and this.

I get the impression sometimes here that people don't dig Vandermeer. I just got to chalk it up to lack of ice time, because he is everything I'd like in a bottom pair d-man. Tough as nails, shoots well, passes decent, limits mistakes and just fills his limited ice time as well as possible.

I can't believe he was used as a forward this season, and maybe that's soured people on him? Regardless, Vandy played 18 minutes a night with Edmonton, he'd make a great regular pair with Braun. Just give the guy some ice time.

SactoShark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 11:01 PM
  #23
spurious
Registered Dummy
 
spurious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SF
Posts: 1,696
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SactoShark View Post
That and this.

I get the impression sometimes here that people don't dig Vandermeer. I just got to chalk it up to lack of ice time, because he is everything I'd like in a bottom pair d-man. Tough as nails, shoots well, passes decent, limits mistakes and just fills his limited ice time as well as possible.

I can't believe he was used as a forward this season, and maybe that's soured people on him? Regardless, Vandy played 18 minutes a night with Edmonton, he'd make a great regular pair with Braun. Just give the guy some ice time.
I thought posters were pretty positive on Vandermeer, although that may be because Colin White would have made anyone else look like a better option on defense for most of the season.

If I were Vandermeer though, I don't know if I'd want to resign here. He's been treated pretty badly. No ice time, and when he does get ice time, he's a forward who gets like five minutes a night.

spurious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 11:27 PM
  #24
Pinkfloyd
Registered User
 
Pinkfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Roseville
Country: United States
Posts: 23,426
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by spurious View Post
I thought posters were pretty positive on Vandermeer, although that may be because Colin White would have made anyone else look like a better option on defense for most of the season.

If I were Vandermeer though, I don't know if I'd want to resign here. He's been treated pretty badly. No ice time, and when he does get ice time, he's a forward who gets like five minutes a night.
Most are positive on Vandermeer. I agree that could be his thought process. Who knows? If the coaches aren't even using him, I can see DW letting him go as a result. However, the mere fact that he has the versatility to step in as a d-man and as a forward should still be appealing for the brass. If they need to go cheap, it's a good option to have to only spend 1 mil on an extra at either spot.

As for Iginla, there's no way the Sharks ought to be involved. I don't think they have the assets and I don't think he will turn this team w/o a lot of other moves to support it, back into a Cup contender.

Pinkfloyd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 10:46 PM
  #25
SoftDumpInTheCorner
Registered User
 
SoftDumpInTheCorner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Man Jose
Country: United States
Posts: 113
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjshark91 View Post
Please no.

The Sharks should try to keep the roster intact. Add a top 9 scoring forward and two dmen to replace White Vandy and possibly Murray.

No more overhauls.

Just my opinion.
I agree, I personally think the Sharks are fine if they can keep this current roster in tact for next season. The only tweaking I would consider is buying out Handzus and find a RW who can play tweener, between 2nd/3rd line, mainly play 3rd line RW, he would replace Mitchell. Resigning Winnik and Moore should be tops on the list for offseason moves.

This past season was not a tweak, it was almost a complete roster overhaul. Its no wonder the Sharks are just now finding their groove, but they couldnt have done it at a better time.

SoftDumpInTheCorner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.