Saw-off. Torts has been coaching longer but both are winners of a sort. Both can push buttons in the room and in the media, can't wait to see Torts lose it though.
Edge: Even
Defense:
Rangers are much more responsible in their own end but we might have more game-breakers with Karlsson and Gonchar. Senators have shown that they can spring out an attack fairly quickly though....
Edge: Rangers
Offense:
Spezza lacks Richards' winning pedigree but he gives fits to the Rangers "D". Michalek is good as well but the depth players usually do some damage here...and Ottawa's depth players have gotten it done in the past.
Edge: Senators
Goaltending:
Hank has played alarmingly poorly for the Rangers versus the Senators. Anderson is questionable playoff-wise, but Hank has never advanced past the second round. Going to give Anderson the edge here since Alfie knows the sweet spots on the other guy.
Edge: Senators
Intangibles:
Rangers have some winners in there but the Senators, as a whole, can boast a lot of playoff experience from Alfredsson to Spezza to Gonchar to Michalek to...so the Senators will not be rattled. A playoff game-winning defenseman (Matt Carkner) probably won't even be starting. That's depth for you.
Edge: Senators
Would love for the Big Apple to surprise, but this has upset all over it...
Saw-off. Torts has been coaching longer but both are winners of a sort. Both can push buttons in the room and in the media, can't wait to see Torts lose it though.
Edge: Even
Defense:
Rangers are much more responsible in their own end but we might have more game-breakers with Karlsson and Gonchar. Senators have shown that they can spring out an attack fairly quickly though....
Edge: Rangers
Offense:
Spezza lacks Richards' winning pedigree but he gives fits to the Rangers "D". Michalek is good as well but the depth players usually do some damage here...and Ottawa's depth players have gotten it done in the past.
Edge: Senators
Goaltending:
Hank has played alarmingly poorly for the Rangers versus the Senators. Anderson is questionable playoff-wise, but Hank has never advanced past the second round. Going to give Anderson the edge here since Alfie knows the sweet spots on the other guy.
Edge: Senators
Intangibles:
Rangers have some winners in there but the Senators, as a whole, can boast a lot of playoff experience from Alfredsson to Spezza to Gonchar to Michalek to...so the Senators will not be rattled. A playoff game-winning defenseman (Matt Carkner) probably won't even be starting. That's depth for you.
Edge: Senators
Would love for the Big Apple to surprise, but this has upset all over it...
Hank has played alarmingly poorly for the Rangers versus the Senators. Anderson is questionable playoff-wise, but Hank has never advanced past the second round. Going to give Anderson the edge here since Alfie knows the sweet spots on the other guy.
Saw-off. Torts has been coaching longer but both are winners of a sort. Both can push buttons in the room and in the media, can't wait to see Torts lose it though.
Edge: Even
Defense:
Rangers are much more responsible in their own end but we might have more game-breakers with Karlsson and Gonchar. Senators have shown that they can spring out an attack fairly quickly though....
Edge: Rangers
Offense:
Spezza lacks Richards' winning pedigree but he gives fits to the Rangers "D". Michalek is good as well but the depth players usually do some damage here...and Ottawa's depth players have gotten it done in the past.
Edge: Senators
Goaltending:
Hank has played alarmingly poorly for the Rangers versus the Senators. Anderson is questionable playoff-wise, but Hank has never advanced past the second round. Going to give Anderson the edge here since Alfie knows the sweet spots on the other guy.
Edge: Senators
Intangibles:
Rangers have some winners in there but the Senators, as a whole, can boast a lot of playoff experience from Alfredsson to Spezza to Gonchar to Michalek to...so the Senators will not be rattled. A playoff game-winning defenseman (Matt Carkner) probably won't even be starting. That's depth for you.
Edge: Senators
Would love for the Big Apple to surprise, but this has upset all over it...
After reading this i've decided that they should just give the Sens the cup now so we don't all have to waste our time to watch them destroy all the other teams.
Saw-off. Torts has been coaching longer but both are winners of a sort. Both can push buttons in the room and in the media, can't wait to see Torts lose it though.
Edge: Even
Defense:
Rangers are much more responsible in their own end but we might have more game-breakers with Karlsson and Gonchar. Senators have shown that they can spring out an attack fairly quickly though....
Edge: Rangers
Offense:
Spezza lacks Richards' winning pedigree but he gives fits to the Rangers "D". Michalek is good as well but the depth players usually do some damage here...and Ottawa's depth players have gotten it done in the past.
Edge: Senators
Goaltending:
Hank has played alarmingly poorly for the Rangers versus the Senators. Anderson is questionable playoff-wise, but Hank has never advanced past the second round. Going to give Anderson the edge here since Alfie knows the sweet spots on the other guy.
Edge: Senators
Intangibles:
Rangers have some winners in there but the Senators, as a whole, can boast a lot of playoff experience from Alfredsson to Spezza to Gonchar to Michalek to...so the Senators will not be rattled. A playoff game-winning defenseman (Matt Carkner) probably won't even be starting. That's depth for you.
Edge: Senators
Would love for the Big Apple to surprise, but this has upset all over it...
Saw-off. Torts has been coaching longer but both are winners of a sort. Both can push buttons in the room and in the media, can't wait to see Torts lose it though.
Edge: Even
Defense:
Rangers are much more responsible in their own end but we might have more game-breakers with Karlsson and Gonchar. Senators have shown that they can spring out an attack fairly quickly though....
Edge: Rangers
Offense:
Spezza lacks Richards' winning pedigree but he gives fits to the Rangers "D". Michalek is good as well but the depth players usually do some damage here...and Ottawa's depth players have gotten it done in the past.
Edge: Senators
Goaltending:
Hank has played alarmingly poorly for the Rangers versus the Senators. Anderson is questionable playoff-wise, but Hank has never advanced past the second round. Going to give Anderson the edge here since Alfie knows the sweet spots on the other guy.
Edge: Senators
Intangibles:
Rangers have some winners in there but the Senators, as a whole, can boast a lot of playoff experience from Alfredsson to Spezza to Gonchar to Michalek to...so the Senators will not be rattled. A playoff game-winning defenseman (Matt Carkner) probably won't even be starting. That's depth for you.
Edge: Senators
Would love for the Big Apple to surprise, but this has upset all over it...
This is one of the worst posts I've ever seen on hfboards. And I've seen a few dandies
Saw-off. Torts has been coaching longer but both are winners of a sort. Both can push buttons in the room and in the media, can't wait to see Torts lose it though.
Edge: Even
Defense:
Rangers are much more responsible in their own end but we might have more game-breakers with Karlsson and Gonchar. Senators have shown that they can spring out an attack fairly quickly though....
Edge: Rangers
Offense:
Spezza lacks Richards' winning pedigree but he gives fits to the Rangers "D". Michalek is good as well but the depth players usually do some damage here...and Ottawa's depth players have gotten it done in the past.
Edge: Senators
Goaltending:
Hank has played alarmingly poorly for the Rangers versus the Senators. Anderson is questionable playoff-wise, but Hank has never advanced past the second round. Going to give Anderson the edge here since Alfie knows the sweet spots on the other guy.
Edge: Senators
Intangibles:
Rangers have some winners in there but the Senators, as a whole, can boast a lot of playoff experience from Alfredsson to Spezza to Gonchar to Michalek to...so the Senators will not be rattled. A playoff game-winning defenseman (Matt Carkner) probably won't even be starting. That's depth for you.
Edge: Senators
Would love for the Big Apple to surprise, but this has upset all over it...
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL Andy better than Hank, common man Im a Sens fan and even I know thats highly incorrect (Hank is also my fav goalie in the NHL). I admit however Hanks record against the Sens doesnt look pretty but he is arguably the biggest threat to the Sens along with Gaborik.
