HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > Non-Sports > Political Discussion - "on-topic & unmoderated"
Political Discussion - "on-topic & unmoderated" Rated PG13, unmoderated but threads must stay on topic - that means you can flame each other all you want as long as it's legal

Alberta Elections Thread

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-05-2012, 12:59 PM
  #176
The Moose
Registered User
 
The Moose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 4,504
vCash: 500
Alberta Election 2012: Parties split along north-south axis: poll

Quote:
The poll also shows the Tories continue to lead the Wildrose by a significant margin in Edmonton, but are lagging behind the Wildrose in Calgary and the rest of the province, where more than half of decided voters are giving their support to the Wildrose.

"If the election splits this way, there will be a real north-south divide in the legislature and that's going to cause some problems," said Leger vice-president Ian Large.

In Edmonton, the Tories lead the Wildrose 37 per cent to 25 per cent, while in Calgary the Wildrose leads the Tories 47 per cent to 34 per cent.
I say we split the province in North Alberta (or Democratic Republic of North Alberta) and South Alberta. The DMZ will be around Red Deer.

The Moose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-05-2012, 01:10 PM
  #177
Melrose Munch
Registered User
 
Melrose Munch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 13,004
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by devils4cup View Post
Wildrose party wants to create a dividend fund. The media nicknamed this fund Danielle bucks or Danielle dollars.

When the provincial government has a surplus a certain percentage of the surplus gets placed into the dividend fund. Once this fund reaches 1 billion $ the government will send cheques with the estimated value of 300$ to every man women and child that lives in Alberta.
So she's saying I'll pay you if the price of oil keeps rising.

Melrose Munch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-05-2012, 02:58 PM
  #178
Concordski
Knockoff Jets FTW
 
Concordski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 4,107
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Moose View Post
Alberta Election 2012: Parties split along north-south axis: poll



I say we split the province in North Alberta (or Democratic Republic of North Alberta) and South Alberta. The DMZ will be around Red Deer.
But that would concentrate the Left enough for them to actually have some power. The Left can't have a voice in Alberta, that's socialism.

Concordski is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-05-2012, 03:00 PM
  #179
devils4cup
ummmmmm...
 
devils4cup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grande Prairie, AB
Posts: 3,502
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melrose Munch View Post
So she's saying I'll pay you if the price of oil keeps rising.
More like, i'll pay you if I have the money.

devils4cup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-05-2012, 03:02 PM
  #180
Concordski
Knockoff Jets FTW
 
Concordski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 4,107
vCash: 50
She'll gladly pay you on tuesday for crude oil today.

Concordski is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-05-2012, 03:38 PM
  #181
Ol' Jase
We got Schultz?
 
Ol' Jase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,851
vCash: 500
http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/...010/story.html

I can't understand what the hell is going on in the Wildrose war room, but the spending promises are now past the point of unrealistic and are borderline insane.

Ol' Jase is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-05-2012, 03:55 PM
  #182
thome_26
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sherwood Park
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,540
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to thome_26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ol' Jase View Post
http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/...010/story.html

I can't understand what the hell is going on in the Wildrose war room, but the spending promises are now past the point of unrealistic and are borderline insane.
My only sense is that they're trying to control the news cycle for the next week up to the debate where they could cement this thing.

__________________
http://hfboards.com/forumdisplay.php?f=160 - the Unofficial HF Political board
thome_26 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-05-2012, 09:19 PM
  #183
Melrose Munch
Registered User
 
Melrose Munch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 13,004
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by devils4cup View Post
More like, i'll pay you if I have the money.
Ok.

Quote:
Originally Posted by thome_26 View Post
My only sense is that they're trying to control the news cycle for the next week up to the debate where they could cement this thing.
So you think Redford will jump to Ottawa if she loses?


Last edited by Melrose Munch: 04-05-2012 at 09:25 PM.
Melrose Munch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-05-2012, 11:46 PM
  #184
thome_26
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sherwood Park
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,540
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to thome_26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melrose Munch View Post
So you think Redford will jump to Ottawa if she loses?
Tough to say; she's young enough and has had a short enough taste of power that one would think that we wouldn't have seen the last of her. At the same time, there is nothing saying that -should she lose the election- she wouldn't dedicate herself to being an effective leader of the opposition and attempt to return the PCs to power.

thome_26 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-06-2012, 12:06 AM
  #185
Concordski
Knockoff Jets FTW
 
Concordski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 4,107
vCash: 50
I think the more pressing question is if the CPC wants Redford. Most of the people in the CPC supported the Canadian Alliance from which the Wildrose Alliance came from.

Concordski is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-06-2012, 12:33 AM
  #186
Melrose Munch
Registered User
 
Melrose Munch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 13,004
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thome_26 View Post
Tough to say; she's young enough and has had a short enough taste of power that one would think that we wouldn't have seen the last of her. At the same time, there is nothing saying that -should she lose the election- she wouldn't dedicate herself to being an effective leader of the opposition and attempt to return the PCs to power.
I think it is a black mark to lose against the Wildrose. It means you are the face of the PC failure and elitism(so called.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielBryanRoleModel View Post
I think the more pressing question is if the CPC wants Redford. Most of the people in the CPC supported the Canadian Alliance from which the Wildrose Alliance came from.
She can go to the Liberal Party. She is more centrist anyway.

Melrose Munch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-06-2012, 08:17 AM
  #187
tony d
1 More Season
 
tony d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Behind A Tree
Country: Canada
Posts: 25,581
vCash: 500
I think if Redford loses this election she'll be turfed out as PC leader. I mean how can you take a party that has had such a strong history as the Alberta PC's and not only have them potentially lose government but lose government by close to 25 or 30 seats).

__________________
Exhibit A as to how hockey doesn't matter on ESPN:

Last night an ESPN program was discussing how the Detroit Pistons needed a hero citing the heroes on the Detroit Tigers, Detroit Lions and no mention of the Detroit Red Wings. All this despite the Red Wings probably being the most succesful team in Detroit right now.
tony d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-06-2012, 09:57 AM
  #188
Roughneck
Registered User
 
Roughneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Calgary
Country: Ireland
Posts: 8,214
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Roughneck
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielBryanRoleModel View Post
I think the more pressing question is if the CPC wants Redford. Most of the people in the CPC supported the Canadian Alliance from which the Wildrose Alliance came from.
They already chose Rob Anders over her when there was a candidate challenge for Calgary West.

Roughneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-06-2012, 11:46 AM
  #189
Alex87
Registered User
 
Alex87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,742
vCash: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire Feaster View Post
They already chose Rob Anders over her when there was a candidate challenge for Calgary West.
This is misleading. IIRC, party rules would make it very difficult for Redford to strip a sitting MP of his nomination. It's not like it was a simple vote and Anders received 50% + 1.

And FWIW, sounds like Alison Redford and Stephen Harper go way back.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...2387909/page1/

Alex87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-06-2012, 12:12 PM
  #190
Melrose Munch
Registered User
 
Melrose Munch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 13,004
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex87 View Post
This is misleading. IIRC, party rules would make it very difficult for Redford to strip a sitting MP of his nomination. It's not like it was a simple vote and Anders received 50% + 1.

And FWIW, sounds like Alison Redford and Stephen Harper go way back.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...2387909/page1/
So CPC can't change the rules.

Melrose Munch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-06-2012, 03:57 PM
  #191
Alex87
Registered User
 
Alex87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,742
vCash: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melrose Munch View Post
So CPC can't change the rules.
The nomination challenge in question was eight years ago. What does changing the rules have to do with the CPC's relationship with Alberta's provincial parties in 2012?

Alex87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-06-2012, 05:25 PM
  #192
DoyleG
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: YEG--->YYJ
Country: Canada
Posts: 775
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielBryanRoleModel View Post
I think the more pressing question is if the CPC wants Redford. Most of the people in the CPC supported the Canadian Alliance from which the Wildrose Alliance came from.
Wildrose was a product of the merger of the Wildrose Party and the Alberta Alliance, which had existed before as fringe parties.

Its only under Smith that it has gained any traction. People expected a WA breakthrough last election and it didn´t happen.

DoyleG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-06-2012, 08:53 PM
  #193
Melrose Munch
Registered User
 
Melrose Munch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 13,004
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex87 View Post
The nomination challenge in question was eight years ago. What does changing the rules have to do with the CPC's relationship with Alberta's provincial parties in 2012?
My point was if Redford could go to Ottawa if she loses. One the calgary seats is held by anders and I was wondering if someone could challenge him.

Melrose Munch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-06-2012, 09:23 PM
  #194
Alex87
Registered User
 
Alex87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,742
vCash: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melrose Munch View Post
My point was if Redford could go to Ottawa if she loses. One the calgary seats is held by anders and I was wondering if someone could challenge him.
Personally I wouldn't at all be surprised if Smith and Redford are CPC colleagues one day. Redford speaks French and would be a shoe-in for a Cabinet post (might even do well if she ran in a leadership race).

With Anders, I don't think anyone will challenge him for the nomination, but you get the sense that he is one screw up away from being booted from caucus.

Alex87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-06-2012, 09:53 PM
  #195
Melrose Munch
Registered User
 
Melrose Munch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 13,004
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex87 View Post
Personally I wouldn't at all be surprised if Smith and Redford are CPC colleagues one day. Redford speaks French and would be a shoe-in for a Cabinet post (might even do well if she ran in a leadership race).

With Anders, I don't think anyone will challenge him for the nomination, but you get the sense that he is one screw up away from being booted from caucus.
Redford is bright and young, she can solidify an Ontario base IMO.

I think Smith wins and becomes the next Klein type long time premier.

I don't know why Anders is still around. I really don't. There must be better people out there.

Melrose Munch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-06-2012, 11:37 PM
  #196
Concordski
Knockoff Jets FTW
 
Concordski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 4,107
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoyleG View Post
Wildrose was a product of the merger of the Wildrose Party and the Alberta Alliance, which had existed before as fringe parties.

Its only under Smith that it has gained any traction. People expected a WA breakthrough last election and it didn´t happen.
The Alberta Alliance can be traced back to a provincial level Canadian Alliance party.

Concordski is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:52 PM
  #197
DoyleG
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: YEG--->YYJ
Country: Canada
Posts: 775
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielBryanRoleModel View Post
The Alberta Alliance can be traced back to a provincial level Canadian Alliance party.
Wrong.

The parties roots were in the Social Credit Party of the 1990s.The first leader of the AA was the former head of the Socreds.

There never was a provincial-level CA. Read history (not your own version).

DoyleG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 02:08 PM
  #198
Concordski
Knockoff Jets FTW
 
Concordski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 4,107
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoyleG View Post
Wrong.

The parties roots were in the Social Credit Party of the 1990s.The first leader of the AA was the former head of the Socreds.

There never was a provincial-level CA. Read history (not your own version).
Reform was also rooted in the Socreds

Concordski is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 07:21 AM
  #199
Auguste Escoffier
Registered User
 
Auguste Escoffier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Country: Uzbekistan
Posts: 5,370
vCash: 500
http://www.backwardsalberta.ca/2012/...r-john-carpay/

Not just because of this guy, but the WRP, as a whole, scare the living **** out of me.

Auguste Escoffier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 09:46 PM
  #200
The Moose
Registered User
 
The Moose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 4,504
vCash: 500
Alberta missing out on oilsands revenue: Study

Quote:
The Alberta government received less than 20% of revenue generated by the oilsands since 1997 — short of its original target of 35% — a new report says.

In the University of Alberta’s Parkland Institute study, completed in mid-March, the Edmonton-based think-tank concluded the oil and gas industry has raked in $260-billion in pre-tax profits since 1986, while the public received less than $25-billion — less than 6% of the total value.

“Albertans have never received more than 20% of the rent in the tarsands, and since 1997 have averaged only 9%,”
Quote:
If the 35% revenue target set in the 1970s by former Progressive Conservative premier Peter Lougheed had been met, the institute estimates Alberta would have pocketed an extra $195-billion between 1971 and 2010.
And we have to choose between a party that wants to keep royalties low and another that wants to make them lower.

The Moose is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.