HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Northeast Division > Toronto Maple Leafs
Notices

Burke's 1st season: 81 points - This season: 80 points... damn

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
04-09-2012, 11:33 AM
  #426
Dalton
Registered User
 
Dalton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ho Chi Minh City
Country: Vietnam
Posts: 2,096
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebluemachine View Post
I'm not claiming anything, this team has tanked because the results over the last few years show that this team has tanked. There is no conspiracy, those are the actual real world results. You can double check on NHL.com if you want.
LMFAO. Rosy world where you live eh? The results show failure by management to achieve their stated goals.

Dalton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 11:34 AM
  #427
thebluemachine*
go ahead, do it
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,193
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalton View Post
It's called hope. At this moment Leaf fans have very little if any.
There is lots of hope in many fans, just because you said there isn't doesn't mean it's true. The future is bright imo, we're getting another lottery pick and have lots of young players in the farm and on the team to look forward to for many years.

thebluemachine* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 11:39 AM
  #428
thebluemachine*
go ahead, do it
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,193
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalton View Post
LMFAO. Rosy world where you live eh? The results show failure by management to achieve their stated goals.
Failure is a part of tanking and rebuilding, how does a team tank without losing? If they didn't lose you can't consider them tankers.

thebluemachine* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 11:40 AM
  #429
Dalton
Registered User
 
Dalton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ho Chi Minh City
Country: Vietnam
Posts: 2,096
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebluemachine View Post
There is lots of hope in many fans, just because you said there isn't doesn't mean it's true. The future is bright imo, we're getting another lottery pick and have lots of young players in the farm and on the team to look forward to for many years.
Maybe. I don't think our farm is anything special but one never knows. I hope I'm wrong.

Dalton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 11:41 AM
  #430
Dalton
Registered User
 
Dalton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ho Chi Minh City
Country: Vietnam
Posts: 2,096
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebluemachine View Post
Failure is a part of tanking and rebuilding, how does a team tank without losing? If they didn't lose you can't consider them tankers.
Tanking may usually mean losing but losing doesn't always mean tanking.

Dalton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 11:46 AM
  #431
thebluemachine*
go ahead, do it
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,193
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalton View Post
Tanking may usually mean losing but losing doesn't always mean tanking.
2 x 5th overall
1 x 7th overall
1 x 2nd overall

Looks like a pretty good tanking team to me. Right up there with every bottom feeder the last few years.

thebluemachine* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 11:52 AM
  #432
thebluemachine*
go ahead, do it
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,193
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalton View Post
Tanking may usually mean losing but losing doesn't always mean tanking.
How does one tank without losing?

thebluemachine* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 12:10 PM
  #433
Dalton
Registered User
 
Dalton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ho Chi Minh City
Country: Vietnam
Posts: 2,096
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebluemachine View Post
How does one tank without losing?
I'm thinking that the concept of failure eludes you. I'm giving you the benefit of doubt of course.

Dalton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 12:17 PM
  #434
thebluemachine*
go ahead, do it
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,193
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalton View Post
I'm thinking that the concept of failure eludes you. I'm giving you the benefit of doubt of course.
How does one fail (tank) without losing?

thebluemachine* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 12:29 PM
  #435
SexyJoffreyLupul
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 414
vCash: 500
The fact that Many leaf fans still feel hopeless is indicative of how much suffering they've gone through. As a guy who just got on the Leafs bandwagon this year, i honestly feel bad for the lot of you. No fan base deserves the humiliation they've gone through for the past decade.

That said, this team has plenty of potential, just look at the marlies.

SexyJoffreyLupul is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 12:30 PM
  #436
Mess
Global Moderator
 
Mess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 53,784
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebluemachine View Post
2 x 5th overall
1 x 7th overall
1 x 2nd overall

Looks like a pretty good tanking team to me. Right up there with every bottom feeder the last few years.
Right you are in that Leafs have been right there among the bottom feeders in on ice results, which clearly demonstrates Burke's inability to ice a competitive hockey team, despite trying hard and spending millions on what he believed were improvements.

Unless of course one believes he purposely acquired Phil Kessel, Joffrey Lupul and Dion Phaneuf and others, with an intentional desired attempt to make the team worse.

PS. That wasn't 2 X 5th overall but rather 1 X 5th and 1 X 9th instead.

__________________
Signature: There is no greater demonstration of Fan patience then to suggest to "Play the Kids " and be willing to accept the consequences of those actions..
Mess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 12:35 PM
  #437
SexyJoffreyLupul
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 414
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mess View Post
Clearly demonstrates Burke's inability to ice a competitive hockey team despite trying hard and spending millions on what he believed was improvements.

Unless of course one believes he purposely acquired Phil Kessel, Joffrey Lupul and Dion Phaneuf and others, with an intentional desired attempt to make the team worse.
Burke bit off more than he could chew, he thought he could build a playoff team while at the same time REBUILD the prospect pool AND ensure a stanley cup contender in 5+ years. He tried to do this with a coach that does not share his philosophy of hockey, so he built a team for him with what he could. Frankly i'm glad wilsons gone and Carlyle is in, we finally have a coach and GM that are on the same page in terms of playstyle and players, especially if we can tap into the Marlies for burkie/carlyle type players

SexyJoffreyLupul is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 12:49 PM
  #438
thebluemachine*
go ahead, do it
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,193
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mess View Post
Right you are in that Leafs have been right there among the bottom feeders in on ice results, which clearly demonstrates Burke's inability to ice a competitive hockey team, despite trying hard and spending millions on what he believed were improvements.

Unless of course one believes he purposely acquired Phil Kessel, Joffrey Lupul and Dion Phaneuf and others, with an intentional desired attempt to make the team worse.

PS. That wasn't 2 X 5th overall but rather 1 X 5th and 1 X 9th instead.
Burke acquired those pieces because you have to make those deals if players like that become available for what we had to give up. No one said we were going to be cup winners instantly or stop rebuilding outright because those trades were made.

How come Edmonton gets praise for failing year after year around here, what have they accomplished other then drafting high? Lots of holes to fill over there last time I checked.

PS We're picking top 5 (lottery) again this year, possibly higher. You stand corrected.

thebluemachine* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 12:51 PM
  #439
Gatorade
Registered User
 
Gatorade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,535
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebluemachine View Post
2 x 5th overall
1 x 7th overall
1 x 2nd overall

Looks like a pretty good tanking team to me. Right up there with every bottom feeder the last few years.
Who the heck tanks without their top picks? The Leafs didn't tank. They unintentionally sucked. There is a BIG difference.

"I'm not interested ... in a five-year rebuild like some of these teams have done," said Burke. "Maybe because of my age, maybe just because I know it doesn't have to be five years because it wasn't in Anaheim"

Gatorade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 12:55 PM
  #440
thebluemachine*
go ahead, do it
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,193
vCash: 500
MOD

When did we stop rebuilding?


Last edited by Fugu: 04-09-2012 at 03:13 PM. Reason: flaming
thebluemachine* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 12:56 PM
  #441
Gatorade
Registered User
 
Gatorade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,535
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebluemachine View Post
MOD

When did we stop rebuilding?
There terms you fail to understand are rebuild and tank.

Gatorade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 12:57 PM
  #442
Mess
Global Moderator
 
Mess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 53,784
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebluemachine View Post
Great point, below are our last 4 seasons in the standings. People keep saying we haven't tanked and I disagree because the numbers prove otherwise.

2011/2012 - 26th overall
2010/2011 - 22nd overall
2009/2010 - 29th overall
2008/2009 - 24th overall
Burke must be some new wave tanking savant, because only a genius could come up with a plan to attempt to finish as low as possible for the draft benefit, and knowing that it only benefits Boston, because he already traded away Leafs own future 2010 and 2011 draft 1st round picks ahead of time. Burke was extremely successful in his tanking pursuit as he gave Boston the 2nd and 32nd overall picks in 2010 and the 9th overall in 2011.

Burke felt the need to add a 30+ goal scorer to his immediate line-up to help assist him to finish near the league bottom in the standings for 3 consecutive years.

Simply brilliant !!!

Mess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 12:58 PM
  #443
Gatorade
Registered User
 
Gatorade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,535
vCash: 500
As if this was all by design:

Two years ago Brian Burke said:

"I like the group that finished the year, I think just on internal improvement we will be better. I think we will be good enough with this group and a couple additions to say in training camp that the playoffs are a reasonable goal."

Gatorade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 01:00 PM
  #444
SexyJoffreyLupul
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 414
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gatorade View Post
As if this was all by design:

Two years ago Brian Burke said:

"I like the group that finished the year, I think just on internal improvement we will be better. I think we will be good enough with this group and a couple additions to say in training camp that the playoffs are a reasonable goal."
he was right, except he screwed up horribly on LACK.

SexyJoffreyLupul is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 01:03 PM
  #445
thebluemachine*
go ahead, do it
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,193
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mess View Post
Burke must be some new wave tanking savant, because only a genius could come up with a plan to attempt to finish as low as possible for the draft benefit, and knowing that it only benefits Boston, because he already traded away Leafs own future 2010 and 2011 draft 1st round picks ahead of time. Burke was extremely successful in his tanking pursuit as he gave Boston the 2nd and 32nd overall picks in 2010 and the 9th overall in 2011.

Burke felt the need to add a 30+ goal scorer to his immediate line-up to help assist him to finish near the league bottom in the standings for 3 consecutive years.

Simply brilliant !!!
The time to add a player like Kessel is anytime, even in the beginning of a rebuild like we did.

thebluemachine* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 01:03 PM
  #446
Gatorade
Registered User
 
Gatorade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,535
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SexyJoffreyLupul View Post
he was right, except he screwed up horribly on LACK.
More than that went wrong. Goaltending is another pain area, PK etc. The team did not improve. They finished worse than before.

The funny part is that we have a single person who is trying to sell that it was all intentional.

Gatorade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 01:04 PM
  #447
thebluemachine*
go ahead, do it
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,193
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gatorade View Post
There terms you fail to understand are rebuild and tank.
We have been rebuilding and have tanked. Kind of easy to see that. What's not to understand?

thebluemachine* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 01:05 PM
  #448
Gatorade
Registered User
 
Gatorade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,535
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebluemachine View Post
The time to add a player like Kessel is anytime, even in the beginning of a rebuild like we did.
Why would you do that if the plan is to tank?

Gatorade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 01:06 PM
  #449
thebluemachine*
go ahead, do it
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,193
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gatorade View Post
As if this was all by design:

Two years ago Brian Burke said:

"I like the group that finished the year, I think just on internal improvement we will be better. I think we will be good enough with this group and a couple additions to say in training camp that the playoffs are a reasonable goal."
Sounds exactly like every GM out there.

thebluemachine* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 01:07 PM
  #450
Gatorade
Registered User
 
Gatorade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,535
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebluemachine View Post
We have been rebuilding and have tanked. Kind of easy to see that. What's not to understand?
Why would a team tank without their own 1st round draft picks? What is the benefit of that?

Gatorade is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.